Abstract
The two concepts of “liudong renkou (floating population or FP)” and “renkou liudong (mobility of the floating population or MOFP)”, along with relevant data based on these two concepts, have long been used extensively in China’s research and policy making, playing a central role in Chinese studies of migration. Unlike the concepts of “migrant” and “migration” in the international literature, which are focused on people’s spatial mobility, “liudong renkou” and “renkou liudong” are identified and measured by the separation of one’s place of residence from one’s place of household registration (hukou), an approach inconsistent with relevant international practices. By analyzing various census data and data from the China Migrant Dynamic Survey (CMDS), this article examines the validity and reliability of these two concepts and the data based on them in the international context, revealing that they have become increasingly invalid and unreliable for the purpose of measuring migration events since China’s reform and opening up in the late 1970s. The results further demonstrate that these two concepts and the data based on them have become increasingly detached from real migration events and processes. They may become invalid by overestimating the volume of the mobile population, ineffective due to systematic omission of certain mobile populations (such as urban-urban migrants), or misleading as to the changing direction of migration flows. In addition, data on the floating population cannot be used to calculate migration rates and are not comparable in the international context. The concepts of “liudong renkou” and “renkou liudong” and data based on these two concepts may still need to be used in China for a long period of time due to the continuing existence of the hukou system and its roles in the provision of public services, social welfare and social security. However, we argue that concepts, measurements, and methods of data collection in research on migration in China should be gradually shifted to and focused on migrations as spatial events; further, transition data, based on an individual’s residence five years ago and one year ago, should be gradually adopted as the main data source and included in the short form of future censuses; additionally, migration event data based on population registration and administrative records should be used more fully, so that China’s migration research can be conducted on the solid basis of valid and reliable data sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bell M, Charles-Edwards E, Kupiszewska D et al., 2015a. Internal migration data around the world: Assessing contemporary practice. Population, Space and Place, 21(1): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1848.
Bell M, Charles-Edwards E, Ueffing P et al., 2015b. Internal migration and development: Comparing migration intensities around the world. Population and Development Review, 41(1): 33–58.
Bilsborrow R E, 2016. Concepts, definitions and data collection approaches. In: White M. International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution. London, New York, Dordrecht: Springer, 109–156.
Chan K W, 2009. The Chinese hukou system at 50. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(2): 197–221.
Chang S, 1996. The floating population: An informal process of urbanisation in China. International Journal of Population Geography: IJPG, 2(3): 197–214.
Cheng M Y, Duan C R, 2021. Highly active population movements in China get further confirmation. Population Research, 45(3): 75–81. (in Chinese)
Duan C R, Sun Y J, 2006. Changes in the scope and definition of the floating population in China’s censuses and surveys. Population Research, 30(4): 70–76. (in Chinese)
Fan C C, 1999. Migration in a socialist transitional economy: Heterogeneity, socioeconomic and spatial characteristics of migrants in China and Guangdong province. The International Migration Review, 33(4): 954–987.
International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), 1982. Multilingual Demographic Dictionary. Liège (Belgium): Ordina Editions.
Lin L Y, Zhu Y, 2015. The space-time paths of the migrants’ mobility across cities and their gender difference: Based on a survey in Fujian province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(6): 725–732. (in Chinese)
Newbold K B, 2021. Population Geography: Tools and Issues. 4th ed. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Qiao X C, 1995. Research on China’s Census: Theoretical Discussion on Relevant Issues. Beijing: China Population Press. (in Chinese)
Rowland D T, 2003. Demographic Methods and Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skeldon R, 1990. Population Mobility in Developing Countries: A Reinterpretation. London: Belhaven Press.
Solinger D J, 1995. The floating population in the cities: Chances for assimilation? In: Davis D S, Kraus R, Naughton B et al. (eds.). Urban Spaces in Contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–139.
Song J, 2019. Population Statistics. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (in Chinese)
Sun M J, Fan C C, 2011. China’s permanent and temporary migrants: Differentials and changes, 1990–2000. The Professional Geographer, 63(1): 92–112.
Tian M, Sun L, Sun J, 2020. Temporal and Spatial Migration Process and Settlement Choice of the Floating Population. Beijing: China Society Press. (in Chinese)
Tian M, Tian Z, Cushing B, 2016. Inter-city migration in China: A recurrent-event duration analysis of repeat migration. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(3): 551–569.
United Nations International Population Institute (UNIPI), 1992. Multilingual Demographic Dictionary. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Wang G X, 2021. New trends in migration and urbanization in China: A preliminary investigation based on the seventh census data. Population & Economics, (5): 36–55. (in Chinese)
White M J, 1971. International Handbook of Migration and Population Distribution. London, New York, Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.
Zelinsky W, 1971. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2): 219–249.
Zhang Z X, Yang S S, 2013. A review on the concepts, data and fields of floating population research. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (6): 102–112, 128. (in Chinese)
Zhou H, 2021. The stability of migration pattern in China and related issues: Consideration based on the data of seventh national census bulletin. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (3): 28–41, 126. (in Chinese)
Zhu Y, 2004. Overseas research on non-permanent migration and its implications for the issues of floating population in China. Population Research, 28(3): 52–59. (in Chinese)
Zhu Y, Lin L Y, 2019. The settlement intention of the floating population in the cities and its determinants: A literature review and its implications. Population & Economics, (2): 17–27. (in Chinese)
Zhu Y, Lin L Y, Ke W Q, 2016. Trends in internal migration and mobility: International experiences and their implications for China. Population Research, 40(5): 50–60. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41971180, No.41971168; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, No.2021J01145
Author: Zhu Yu (1961–), PhD and Professor, specialized in migration, urbanization and regional development.
This paper is initially published in Acta Geographica Sinica (Chinese edition), 2022, 77(12): 2991–3005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Y., Lin, L., Li, T. et al. The validity and international comparability of China’s floating population concepts and data. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 1815–1831 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2154-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2154-2