Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial relationship of high-speed transportation construction and land-use efficiency and its mechanism: Case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land-use efficiency is low for the urban agglomeration of China. High-speed transportation construction has been an important factor driving land use change. It is critically important to explore the spatial relationship between the high-speed transportation superiority degree and land-use efficiency. We built a model to evaluate the benefits of convenient high-speed transportation using the relative density of highways and the distance from high-speed rail stations and airports as a metric. We used 42 counties of the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration as an example. Land-use efficiency was calculated by a DEA model with capital, labor, economic benefits and environmental benefits as input and output factors. We examined the spatial relationships between high-speed transport superiority degree and land-use efficiency and obtained the following results. First, there are significant spatial differences in the relationships between the high-speed transportation superiority degree and land-use efficiency. Taking the two major cities of Jinan and Qingdao as the hubs, the core surrounding counties show significant spatial relationship between land-use efficiency and the high-speed transportation superiority degree. Spatial correlation declines as the distance from the hubs increases. Land-use efficiency is less than high-speed transportation convenience in areas along the transportation trunks that are distant from the hub cities. Correlation is low in areas that are away from both hub cities and transportation trunk routes. Second, high-speed transportation has a positive relationship with land-use efficiency due to the mechanism of element agglomeration exogenous growth. Third, high-speed transportation facilitates the flow of goods, services and technologies between core cities and peripheral cities as space spillover (the hub effect). This alters the spatial pattern of regional land-use efficiency. Finally, the short-board effect caused by decreased high-speed transport construction can be balanced by highway construction and the proper node layouts of high-speed rail stations and airports, resulting in a well-balanced spatial pattern of land-use efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkemik K A, 2005. Labor productivity and inter-sectoral reallocation of labor in Singapore (1965–2002). Ge Growth Math Methods, 30: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W et al., 1989. Constrained game formulations and interpretations for data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 40: 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kang C D, 2011. Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy, 18(1): 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin F S, Kaiser E J, 1967. Urban Land Use Planning. 3rd ed. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debrezion G, Pels E, Rietveld P, 2011. The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: An empirical analysis of the Dutch Housing Market. Urban Studies, 48(5): 997–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P, 2004. Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2(5): 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du D, 2016. The causal relationship between land urbanization quality and economic growth: Evidence from capital cities in China. Quality & Quantity, 51: 2707–2723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C L, Guan X L, 2011. Comprehensive measurement and spatial distinction of input-output efficiency of urban agglomerations in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1011–1022. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y Z, Zheng S Q, 2010. The impacts of rail transit on property values and land development intensity: The case of No.13 Line in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 213–223. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan Y J, Chen X J, 2013. A study on urban land use efficiency in Weinan City. Urban Problems, (10): 72–77. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y Y, Li L, Li G C et al., 2015. Overview of interaction between urban land use and transportation. Urban Planning International, 30(3): 29–36. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia Z H, Hao J M, 2011. Evaluation of urban land intensive utilization based on fuzzy comprehensive assessment method: A case study of Changzhi City. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(12): 129–134. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W, 2008. Discrimination method and its application analysis of regional transport superiority. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(8): 787–798. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson H M, 1960. Sociology: A Systematic Introduction. Paris: Allied Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Geist H J, 2003. Regional differences in tropical deforestation. Environment, 45(6): 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M J, Chen G H, 2003. A review on the research and application of DEA. Engineering Sciences, 5(6): 88–94. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Xu X X, Chen H H, 2005. Temporal and spatial changes of urban efficiency in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(4): 615–625. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C G, Gao G P, Zhuang J, 2005. An empirical analysis of urban economic development and land use efficiency in Shandong Province. China Economist, (8): 257–259. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S H, Wu C J, Chen T, 2001. A critical review on the progress of urban land use theories in the West. Geographical Research, 20(1): 111–119. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X W, Zhang D X, Chen B M, 2008. Characteristics of China’s town-level land use in rapid urbanization stage. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(3): 301–310. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Chen X, Li X et al., 2018. Sustainable station-level planning: An integrated transport and land use design model for transit-oriented development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170(1): 1052–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng D Y, Shen J H, Lu Y Q, 2014. Evolvement of spatial pattern of county level transportation superiority in Henan, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(3): 280–287. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou X, Feng C C, Shen Q Y, 2007. Application of synergisticity model in urban land-use potential appraisal. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 23(1): 42–45. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peneder M, 2003. Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 14(4): 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen T, 2013. A review on land use at home and abroad. Contemporary Economics, (24): 156–157. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C X, Cui X G, Wang X Q, 2014. Analysis of Chinese “Urban Agglomerations Disease” phenomenon under new urbanization background. Urban Development Studies, 21(10): 12–17. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C X, Wang G F, Liu R C et al., 2010. Empirical research on evaluation model of transport superiority degree: A case study of Shandong Province. Human Geography, 25(1): 73–76. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X W, Wang S J, Song Y et al., 2015. Changchun land use spatio-temporal variation under the transportation elements’ driving. Economic Geography, 35(4): 155–161. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y P, Chen K M, Ma C Q, 2008. Quantitative analysis of coordination between rail transit network configuration and urban form. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, (11): 11–15. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu D W, Mao H Y, Zhang X L et al., 2011. Assessment of urban land use efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1111–1121. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Hui E, Zhao P et al., 2018. Land use policy for urbanization in China. Habitat International, 77: 40–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Peng H, Xu Q et al., 2009. Land changes and conflicts coordination in coastal urbanization: A case study of the Shandong Peninsula in China. Coastal Management, 37(1): 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H Q, Hu Y, Wang Q X, 2015. Evaluation of land use efficiency in three major urban agglomerations of China in 2001–2012. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(9): 1095–1100. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q K, Duan X J, Ye L et al., 2014. Efficiency evaluation of city land utilization in the Yangtze River Delta using a SBM-Undesirable model. Resources Science, 36(4): 712–721. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M, 2002. Data, Models and Decision. Beijing: China Machine Press, 196–198. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanglin Fang.

Additional information

Foundation: Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41590840, No.41590842

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, X., Fang, C., Wang, Z. et al. Spatial relationship of high-speed transportation construction and land-use efficiency and its mechanism: Case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 549–562 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1614-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1614-1

Keywords

Navigation