Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive assessment for removing multiple pollutants by plants in bioretention systems

  • Article
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Bioretention is a best management practice which uses vegetation to improve the pollutant removal rates in the rain water management. To select the best plant species to remove multiple pollutants in a bioretention system, we tested thirty species of plants in a laboratory in Beijing, China. We found that the ability of the plants to reduce concentrations of heavy metals including cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and ammonium (NH4 +–N) is more than 90 %. The removal efficiencies for NH4 +–N, nitrate (NO3 –N), total phosphorus, and copper (Cu) varied markedly among plant species. The single overall best plant was not easy to be determined. To select the best plant species, we used a dynamic neural network to establish an assessment index system, assessment criteria, and an assessment model that is used here for the first time for multiple pollutants’ removal. Applying the theory and model, we discovered that Plantago asiatica L. and Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. are the overall best plants for removing the seven typical pollutants. This paper will provide a simple and useful guide for the comprehensive assessment of multiple pollutant removal by plants in complex ecological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu SL, Barnes SL, Gerde VW (1993) Testing of best management practices for controlling highway runoff. Technical report. Richmond Publishers, Virginia Department of Transportation, pp 16–29

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mei Y, Yang XH, Chang CC et al (2012) Set pair analysis for optimal selection of bioretention media. Adv Sci Lett 10:687–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2008) Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environ Sci Technol 42:2535–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DeBusk KM, Wynn TM (2011) Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation. J Environ Eng-ASCE 137:800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilroy KL, McCuen RH (2010) The effects of buffer strips and bioretention facilities on agricultural productivity and environmental quality in Central Africa. J Hydrol 385:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucas WC, Greenway M (2008) Nutrient retention in vegetated and nonvegetated bioretention mesocosms. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 134:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsieh C, Davis AP (2005) Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. J Environ Eng-ASCE 130:1521–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blecken GY, Zinger A, Deletic Fletcher TD et al (2009) Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecol Eng 35:769–778

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cho KW, Song KG, Cho JW et al (2009) Removal of nitrogen by a layered soil infiltration system during intermittent storm events. Chemosphere 76:690–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas WC, Greenway M (2011) Hydraulic response and nitrogen retention in bioretention mesocosms with regulated outlets: part i-hydraulic response. Water Environ Res 83:692–702

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bratieres K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A et al (2008) Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. Water Res 42:3930–3940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H et al (2003) Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal. Water Environ Res 75:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Read J, Wevill T, Fletcher T et al (2008) Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Res 42:893–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt WF, Smith JT, Jadlocki SJ et al (2008) Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte NC. J Environ Eng-ASCE 134:403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapman C, Horner RR (2010) Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system. Water Environ Res 82:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adebowale KO, Agunbiade FO, Olu-Owolabi BI (2008) Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of metal contamination of water and sediments in Ondo Estuary Nigeria. Chem Ecol 24:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu XW, Li LY, Lei K et al (2010) Water quality assessment of Wei River, China using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Environ Earth Sci 60:1693–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andronache C (2009) Principal component analysis of sea surface temperature in the North Atlantic Ocean. Int J Mod Phys C 20:1789–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams JC, Mellor M, Joyce M (2011) Determination of the depth of localized radioactive contamination by (137) Cs and (60) Co in sand with principal component analysis. Environ Sci Technol 45:8262–8267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng LH, Zhang XC, Luo GY (2008) Application of system dynamics in analyzing the carrying capacity of water resources in Yiwu City China. Math Comput Simul 79:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang XH, Yang ZF, Shen ZY et al (2004) A multi-objective decision-making ideal interval method for comprehensive assessment on water resource renewability. Sci China Ser E-Eng Mater Sci 47:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bryan BA, Crossman ND (2008) Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management. J Environ Manag 88:1175–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21:1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao MY, Cheng CT, Chau KW et al (2006) Multiple criteria data envelopment analysis for full ranking units associated to environment impact assessment. Int J Environ Pollut 28:448–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muttil N, Chau KW (2007) Machine learning paradigms for selecting ecologically significant input variables. Eng Appl Artif Intell 20:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu CL, Chau KW (2006) Mathematical model of water quality rehabilitation with rainwater utilization: a case study at Haigang. Int J Environ Pollut 28:534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xie JX, Cheng CT, Chau KW et al (2006) A hybrid adaptive time-delay neural network model for multi-step-ahead prediction of sunspot activity. Int J Environ Pollut 28:364–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng CT, Wang WC, Xu DM et al (2008) Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos. Water Resour Manag 22:895–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chau KW, Cheng CT, Li CW (2002) Knowledge management system on flow and water quality modeling. Expert Syst Appl 22:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov R (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 303:504–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iliadis LS, Maris F (2007) An artificial neural network model for mountainous water-resources management: the case of cyprus mountainous watersheds. Environ Model Softw 22:1066–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang XH, Yang ZF, Yin XA et al (2008) Chaos gray-coded genetic algorithm and its application for pollution source identifications in convection–diffusion equation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13:1676–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ding S, Su CY, Yu J (2011) An optimizing BP dynamic neural network algorithm based on genetic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 36:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McNett JK, Hunt WF (2011) An evaluation of the toxicity of accumulated sediments in forebays of stormwater wetlands and wetponds. Water Air Soil Poll 218:529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang XH, Shen ZY (2005) Intelligent algorithms and their applications in resource and environment system modeling. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Freiwan M, Cigizoglu HK (2005) Prediction of total monthly rainfall in Jordan using feed forward backpropagation method. Fresenius Environ Bull 14:142–151

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang XH, She DX, Yang ZF et al (2009) Chaotic Bayesian method based on multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) for forecasting nonlinear hydrological time series. Int J Nonlinear Sci 10:1595–1610

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang XH, Mei Y, She DX et al (2011) Chaotic Bayesian best prediction method and its application in hydrological time series. Comput Math Appl 61:1975–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Funds for Creative Research Groups of China (51121003), the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB951104), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100003110024), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51079004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohua Yang.

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Mei, Y., He, J. et al. Comprehensive assessment for removing multiple pollutants by plants in bioretention systems. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 1446–1453 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0200-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0200-2

Keywords

Navigation