Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting pinning nodes to control complex networked systems

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the fundamental problems in pinning control of complex networks is selecting appropriate pinning nodes, such that the whole system is controlled. This is particularly useful for complex networks with huge numbers of nodes. Recent research has yielded several pinning node selection strategies, which may be efficient. However, selecting a set of pinning nodes and identifying the nodes that should be selected first remain challenging problems. In this paper, we present a network control strategy based on left Perron vector. For directed networks where nodes have the same in- and out-degrees, there has so far been no effective pinning node selection strategy, but our method can find suitable nodes. Likewise, our method also performs well for undirected networks where the nodes have the same degree. In addition, we can derive the minimum set of pinning nodes and the order in which they should be selected for given coupling strengths. Our proofs of these results depend on the properties of non-negative matrices and M-matrices. Several examples show that this strategy can effectively select appropriate pinning nodes, and that it can achieve better results for both directed and undirected networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. F. Wang, and G. Chen. Pinning control of scale-free dynamical networks. Phys A, 2002, 310: 281–302

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen T, Liu X, Lu W. Pinning complex networks by a single controller. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2007, 54: 1317–1326

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou J, Lu J, Lü J. Pinning adaptive synchronization of a general complex dynamical network. Automatica, 2008, 44: 996–1003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J, Lu J, Lü J. Erratum to: Pinning adaptive synchronization of a general complex dynamical network. [Automatica 44 (2008) 996–1003]. Automatica, 2009, 45: 598–599

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun W, Lü J, Chen S, et al. Pinning impulsive control algorithms for complex network. Chaos, 2014, 24: 013141

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang P, Lü J, Yu X. Identification of important nodes in directed biological networks: A network motif approach. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9: e106132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jalili M, Askari Sichani O, Yu X. Optimal pinning controllability of complex networks: Dependence on network structure. Phys Rev E, 2015, 91: 012803

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Li X, Wang X, Chen G. Pinning a complex dynamical network to its equilibrium. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2004, 51: 2074–2087

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu W, Chen G, Lü J. On pinning synchronization of complex dynamical networks. Automatica, 2009, 45: 429–435

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu J Q, Ho D W, Wang Z D. Pinning stabilization of linearly coupled stochastic neural networks via minimum number of controllers. IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 2009, 20: 1617–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiong W, Ho D W C, Huang C. Pinning synchronization of timevarying polytopic directed stochastic networks. Phys Lett A, 2010, 374: 439–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu H, Xie G, Wang L. Containment of linear multi-agent systems under general interaction topologies. Syst Control Lett, 2012, 61: 528–534

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. DeLellis P, Garofalo F, Lo Iudice F. The partial pinning control strategy for large complex networks. Automatica, 2018, 89: 111–116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Li B, Lu J, et al. Pinning control for the disturbance decoupling problem of boolean networks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2017, 62: 6595–6601

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez E N, Rodriguez-Castellanos D I, Chen G, et al. Pinning control of complex network synchronization: A recurrent neural network approach. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2017, 15: 1405–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song Q, Liu F, Cao J, et al. M-matrix strategies for pinning-controlled leader-following consensus in multiagent systems with nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2013, 43: 1688–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song Q, Cao J. On pinning synchronization of directed and undirected complex dynamical networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2010, 57: 672–680

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang F. Matrix Theory: Basic Results and Techniques. New York: Springer, 2011

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Horn R A, Johnson C R. Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Berman A, Plemmons R J. Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1994

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Song Q, Liu F, Cao J, et al. Pinning-controllability analysis of complex networks: An M-matrix approach. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I, 2012, 59: 2692–2701

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ZunShui Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Z., Xin, Y., Cao, J. et al. Selecting pinning nodes to control complex networked systems. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 61, 1537–1545 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9319-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-018-9319-4

Keywords

Navigation