Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of driving conditions and suspension parameters on dynamic load-sharing of longitudinal-connected air suspensions

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of driving conditions and suspension parameters on dynamic load-sharing of longitudinal-connected air suspensions of a tri-axle semi-trailer. A novel nonlinear model of a multi-axle semi-trailer with longitudinal-connected air suspension was formulated based on fluid mechanics and thermodynamics and was validated through test results. The effects of driving conditions and suspension parameters on dynamic load-sharing and road-friendliness of the semi-trailer were analyzed. Simulation results indicate that the road-friendliness metric-DLC (dynamic load coefficient) is not always in accordance with the load-sharing metric-DLSC (dynamic load-sharing coefficient). The effect of employing larger air lines and connectors on the DLSC optimization ratio gives varying results as road roughness increases and as driving speed increases. When the vehicle load reduces, or the static pressure increases, the DLSC optimization ratio declines monotonically. The results also indicate that if the air line diameter is always assumed to be larger than the connector diameter, the influence of air line diameter on load-sharing is more significant than that of the connector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis L E, Bunker M B. Load-sharing in heavy vehicle suspensions-New metrics for old. Queensland University of Technology, QUT Digital Repository, Brisbane, Australia, 2008

  2. Potter T E C, Cebon D, Cole D J, et al. Road damage due to dynamic tyre forces, measured on a public road. Int J Heavy Veh Syst, 1996, 3: 346–362

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cebon D. Assessment of the dynamic wheel forces generated by heavy road vehicles. Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Suspension Characteristics, Canberra, Australia, 1987. 199–212

  4. Cantieni R, Krebs W, Heywood R. Dynamic interaction between vehicles and infrastructure experiment (divine), Technical Report No. DSTI/DOT/RTR/IR6(98)1/FINAL. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, France, 1998

  5. Department of Transport and Regional Services, Australia. Vehicle Standards Bulletin VSB 11 Certification of road-friendly suspension systems. Australian Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, Canberra, Australia, 2004

  6. Costanzi M, Cebon D. An investigation of the effects of lorry suspension performance on road maintenance costs. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec, 2007, 221: 1265–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sweatman P F. A study of dynamic wheel forces in axle group suspensions of heavy vehicles. Australian Road Research Board, Special report. Report No. SR27. Vermont South, Victoria, Australia

  8. de Pont J. J. Assessing heavy vehicle suspensions for road wear. Research report No. 95. Transfund New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Potter T E C, Cebon D, Collop A C, et al. Road-damaging potential of measured dynamic tyre forces in mixed traffic. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut, 1996, 210: 215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. OECD Scientific Expert Group. Dynamic loading of pavements: Road transport research. Organization for Economic, Paris, France, 1992

  11. Estill & Associates Pty Ltd. Operational stability and performance of air suspension on various vehicle configurations. Australia: Department of Transport and Works, South Perth, WA, Australia, 2000

  12. Roaduser Systems Pty Ltd. Stability and on-road performance of multi-combination vehicles with air suspension systems. Australia: National Road Transport Commission, Canberra, Australia, 2005

  13. Davis L E. Heavy vehicle suspensions-testing and analysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis L E, Bunker J M. Altering heavy vehicle air suspension dynamic forces by modifying air lines. Int J Heavy Veh Syst, 2011, 18: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roebuck R L, Cebon D, Dale S G. Optimal control of a semi-active tri-axle lorry suspension. Veh Syst D, 2006, 44: 892–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao W Z, Wang C Y. Mixed H2/H∞ road feel control of EPS based on genetic algorithm. Sci China Tech Sci, 2012, 55: 72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu Y J, Yang S P, Li S H. Research on dynamics of a class of heavy vehicle-tire-road coupling system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 2054–2063

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Romero J A, Lozano A. Effect of truck suspension and tire properties on pavement damage spatial distribution.” Transport Res Rec, No. 1949, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 148–154

  19. Shi X M, Cai C S. Simulation of dynamic effects of vehicles on pavement using a 3d interaction model. J Transp Eng-ASCE, 2009, 135: 736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO. Mechanical vibration-road surface profiles-reporting of measured data. ISO 8068: 1995 (E), Geneva, 1995

  21. Chen J P, Chen W W, Zhu H, et al. Modeling and simulation on stochastic road surface irregularity based on Matlab/Simulink. Trans Chin S Agr Mach, 2010, 41: 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prabakar R S, Sujatha C, Narayanan S. Optimal semi-active preview control response of a half car vehicle model with magnetorheological damper. J Sound Vib, 2009, 326: 400–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang J S, Zhu S H. Linearized model for dynamic stiffness of air spring with auxiliary chamber. J Vib Shock, 2009, 28: 72–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. White F M. Fluid Mechanics. Columbus: McGraw-Hill, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen S M. Hydraulic and Pneumatic Transmission. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davis L E, Bunker J M. Suspension Testing of 3 Heavy Vehicles-Dynamic Wheel Force Analysis-Report. Australia: Department of Main Roads-Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davis L E, Bunker J M. Heavy vehicle suspension testing and analysis-dynamic load sharing. Australia: Department of Main Roads-Queensland Government, Brisbane, Australia, 2009

  28. Chen H X, He Z Y. A study on simulation of road roughness based on international roughness index. Highway, 2008, 11: 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lu Y J, Yang S P, Li S H, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on stochastic dynamic load of a heavy duty vehicle. Appl Math M, 2010, 34: 2698–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YiKai Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., He, J., King, M. et al. Effect of driving conditions and suspension parameters on dynamic load-sharing of longitudinal-connected air suspensions. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 56, 666–676 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-5091-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-5091-3

Keywords

Navigation