Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of decreasing alkalinity on microbial community dynamics in a sulfate-reducing bioreactor as analyzed by PCR-SSCP

  • Published:
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and Southern blotting techniques were adopted to investigate microbial community dynamics in a sulfate-reducing bioreactor caused by decreasing influent alkalinity. Experimental results indicated that the sulfate-removal rate approached 87% in 25 d under the conditions of influent alkalinity of 4000 mg/L (as CaCO3) and sulfate-loading rate of 4.8 g/(L·d), which indicated that the bioreactor started up successfully. The analysis of microbial community structure in this stage showed that Lactococcus sp., Anaerofilum sp. and Kluyvera sp. were dominant populations. It was found that when influent alkalinity reduced to 1000 mg/L, sulfate-removal rate decreased rapidly to 35% in 3 d. Then influent alkalinity was increased to 3000 mg/L, the sulfate-removal rate rose to 55%. Under these conditions, the populations of Dysgonomonas sp., Sporobacte sp., Obesumbacterium sp. and Clostridium sp. got to rich, which predominated in the community together with Lactococcus sp., Anaerofilum sp. and Kluyvera sp. However, when the alkalinity was decreased to 1500 mg/L, the sulfate-removal rate rose to and kept stable at 70% and populations of Dysgonomonas sp., Sporobacter sp. and Obesumbacterium sp. died out, while some strains of Desulfovibrio sp. and Clostridium sp. increased in concentration. In order to determine the minimum alkalinity value that the system could tolerate, the influent alkalinity was decreased from 1500 to 400 mg/L secondly. This resulted in the sulfate-removal rate, pH value and effluent alkalinity dropping quickly. The amount of Petrotoga sp., Prevotella sp., Kluyvera sp. and Neisseria sp. reduced obviously. The result data from Southern blotting indicated that the amount of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRBs) decreased with influent alkalinity dropping. Analysis of the microbial community structure and diversity showed that the SRBs populations were very abundant in the inoculated activated sludge and the alkalinity decrease caused the reduction of the populations noted. Most of resident populations in the bioreactor were fermentative acidogenic bacteria (FABs), among which the phylum Firmicute was in the majority, but SRBs were very few. This community structure demonstrates the cooperation between SRBs and FABs, which sustains the system’s high sulfate-removal and operation stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zuo J E, Hu J C. Anaerobic biological treatment of organic wastewater containing sulfate. Environ Sci (in Chinese), 1991, 12(3): 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mizuno O, Noike T. The behavior of sulfate-reducing bacteria in acid-producing phase of anaerobic digestion. Water Res, 1998, 32(5): 1626–1634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang A J, Ren N Q, Liu W, Huang Z, Zhen W D. The role of sulfate reducing bacteria population in acidogenic-desulfate bioreactor. China Environ Sci (in Chinese), 2001, 21(2): 119–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuo J E. Study on new processes of high sulfate organic waste-water biotreatment (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang A J, Ren N Q, Zhen W D, Zhang Y. Study on the quantifying of restrictive ecological factors in acidogenic desulfate bioreactor. Acta Sci Circumst (in Chinese), 2002, 22(2): 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang A J, Ren N Q, Lin M, Du D Z. Stabilization and control of alkalinity during sulfate-reduction. J Harbin Inst Technol (in Chinese), 2003, 35(6): 651–654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y H, Ye Y F, Liu X D. Sulfate-reducing bacteria and their impacted factors. Environ Pollut Contr (in Chinese), 1997, 19(5): 1041–1043

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee D H, Zo Y G, Kim S J. Nonradioactive method to study genetic profiles of natural bacterial communities by PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62(9): 3112–3120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmalenberger A, Tebbe C C. Bacterial diversity in maize rhizospheres: Conclusions on the use of genetic profiles based on PCR-amplified partial small subunit rRNA genes in ecological studies. Mol Ecol, 2003, 12(1): 251–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sliwinski M K, Goodman R M. Spatial heterogeneity of crenar-chaeal assemblages within mesophilic soil ecosystems as revealed by PCR-single-stranded conformation polymorphism profiling. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 70(3): 1811–1820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Delbès C, Moletta R, Godon J-J. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA dynamics during an acetate crisis in an anaerobic digestor ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2001, 35(1): 16–26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zumstein E, Moletta R, Godon J-J. Examination of two years of community dynamics in an anaerobic bioreactor using fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Environ Microbiol, 2000, 2(1): 69–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Subramanian K, Rutvisuttinunt W, Scott W, Myers R S. The enzymatic basis of processivity in λ exonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003, 31(6): 1585–1596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassam B J, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff P M. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem, 1991, 196(1): 80–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao Y G, Ren N Q, Wang A J Liu G M, Zhao S Q, Shang X X. Microbial community structure in sulfate-reducing reactor analyzed by single-strand conformation polymorphism technique. Environ Sci (in Chinese), 2005, 26(4): 171–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Muyzer G, De Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1993, 59(3): 695–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Amann R, Stromley J, Devereux R, Key R, Stahl D A. Molecular and microscopic identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1992, 58(2): 614–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cole J R, Chai B, Marsh T L, Farris R J, Wang Q, Kulam S A, Chandra S, McGarrell D M, Schmidt T M, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): Previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res, 2003, 31(1): 442–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schaffer A A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997, 25(17): 3389–3402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xing D, Ren N, Gong M, Li J Z, Li Q B. Monitoring of microbial community structure and succession in the biohydrogen production reactor by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Sci China Ser C-Life Sci, 2005, 48(2): 155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Muyzer G, Teske A, Wirsen C O, Jannasch H W. Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel-electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Arch Microbio, 1995, 164(3): 165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Woese C R, Stackebrandt E, Macy T J, Fox G E. A phylogenetic definition of the major eubacterial taxa. Syst Appl Microbiol, 1985, 6: 143–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zellner G, Stackebrandt E, Nagel D, Messner P, Weiss N, Winter J. Anaerofilum pentosovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Anaerofilum agile sp. nov., two new, strictly anaerobic, mesophilic, acidogenic bacteria from anaerobic bioreactors. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 1996, 46(4): 871–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hofstad T, Olsen I, Eribe E R, Falsen E, Collins M D, Lawson P A. Dysgonomonas gen. nov. to accommodate Dysgonomonas gadei sp. nov., an organism isolated from a human gall bladder, and Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides (formerly CDC group DF-3). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2000, 50(6): 2189–2195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren Nanqi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, N., Zhao, Y., Wang, A. et al. The effect of decreasing alkalinity on microbial community dynamics in a sulfate-reducing bioreactor as analyzed by PCR-SSCP. SCI CHINA SER C 49, 370–378 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-006-2004-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-006-2004-3

Keywords

Navigation