Skip to main content
Log in

Interval neutrosophic prioritized OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of prioritized aggregated operator and prioritized ordered weighted average (POWA) operator, in this paper, the authors further present interval neutrosophic prioritized ordered weighted aggregation (INPOWA) operator with respect to interval neutrosophic numbers (INNs). Firstly, the definition, operational laws, characteristics, expectation and comparative method of INNs are introduced. Then, the INPOWA operator is developed, and some properties of the operator are analyzed. Furthermore, based on the INPOWA operator and the comparative formula of the INNs, an approach to decision making with INNs is established. Finally, an illustrative example is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh L A, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu T C, A fuzzy number interval arithmetic based fuzzy MCDM algorithm, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2002, 4: 867–872.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu Z S, Study on method for triangular fuzzy number-based multi-attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang J Q, Programming method of fuzzy group multiple criteria decision making with incomplete information, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26: 1604–1608.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J Q, Overview on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach, Control and Decision, 2008, 23: 601–606.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Atanassov K T, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20: 87–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Li D F, The GOWA operator based approach to multi-attribute decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011, 53: 1182–1196.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu Z S and Yager R R, Intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 2011, 41: 568–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei G W, Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making, Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10: 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Atanassov K T and Gargov G, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 3: 343–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Atanassov K T, Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994, 64: 159–174.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Smarandache F, A Unifying Field in Logics. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Logic, American Research Press, Rehoboth, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Smarandache F, and Zhang R Y, Sunderraman, Single valued neutrosophic sets, Proc. of 10th 476 Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Theory and Technology, Salt Lake City, 477 Utah, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ye J, Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment, International Journal of General Systems, 2013, 42(4): 386–394.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Smarandache F, and Zhang Y Q, et al., Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: Theory and applications in computing, Hexis, Phoenix, AZ, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ye J, Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 24: 165–172.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yager R R, Prioritized aggregated operators, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008, 48(1): 263–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yager R R, Prioritized OWA aggregated, Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 2009, 10(8): 245–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson A, Non-Standard Analysis, North-Holland Pub. Co., 1966.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Hagan M, Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1988, 681–689.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Hagan M, Using maximum entropy-ordered weighted average to construct a fuzzy neuron, Proceedings of the 24th Annual IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 1990, 618–623.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, and Chiclana F, Multi-person decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129: 372–385.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y and Xu Z S, A new method of giving OWA weights, Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2008, 38(3): 51–61.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peide Liu.

Additional information

This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71471172 and 71271124, the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 13YJC630104, Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning Project under Grant No. 13BGLJ10, the National Soft Science Research Project under Grant No. 2014GXQ4D192, and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province under Grant No. ZR2014JL046.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor TANG Xijin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Wang, Y. Interval neutrosophic prioritized OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 681–697 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-4010-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-4010-7

Keywords

Navigation