Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resektion neoplastischer Kolonläsionen

Resection of neoplastic colonic lesions

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die effektive Resektion neoplastischer Kolonläsionen kann wesentlich zur Senkung der Inzidenz und Mortalität des kolorektalen Karzinoms (KRK) beitragen.

Fragestellung

Für welche neoplastische Kolonläsion ist welches resezierende Verfahren am besten geeignet?

Material und Methoden

Beschreibung und Bewertung der verschiedenen Resektionsverfahren, Diskussion aktueller Leitlinien, Übersichtsarbeiten und Originalarbeiten.

Schlussfolgerung

Die effektive Resektion neoplastischer Kolonläsionen kann heutzutage mehrheitlich endoskopisch erfolgen. Im Falle einer fortgeschrittenen Tiefeninfiltration müssen chirurgisch-onkologische Resektionsverfahren zum Einsatz kommen.

Abstract

Background

The effective resection of neoplastic colonic lesions can significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Question

Which resection procedure is best suited for which neoplastic colonic lesion?

Material and methods

Description and evaluation of the various resection techniques, discussion of current guidelines, reviews and original articles.

Conclusion

The effective resection of neoplastic colonic lesions can nowadays be carried out endoscopically in the majority of cases. In the case of advanced deep infiltration, surgical oncological resection procedures have to be performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF et al (2012) Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 366(8):687–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Loberg M, Zauber AG, Regula J, Kuipers EJ, Hernan MA, McFadden E, Sunde A, Kalager M et al (2016) Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 176(7):894–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. n. A. (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl):S3–43

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T et al (2008) Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 68(4 Suppl):S3–S47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N et al (2016) Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 28(5):526–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, Kaltenbach TR, Sano Y, Ponchon T, Saunders BP, Rex DK, Soetikno RM (2013) Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 78(4):625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. IJspeert JEG, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Meijer GA, van Eeden S, Sanduleanu S, Schoon EJ, Bisseling TM, Spaander MC, van Lelyveld N et al (2016) Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut 65(6):963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 1.0, AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 021-007OL, http://leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/Leitlinien.7.0.html

  9. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K et al (2017) Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 49(3):270–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H, Fiarman GS (2006) Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):343–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, Anderson P, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Levy LC, Toor A, Mackenzie TA, Rosch T et al (2013) Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 144(1):74–80.e71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muniraj T, Sahakian A, Ciarleglio MM, Deng Y, Aslanian HR (2015) Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile colonic polyps: a single-center experience. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:175959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jideh B, Bourke MJ (2019) How to perform wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection and follow-up examinations. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 29(4):629–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace MB (2017) New strategies to improve polypectomy during colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 13(10 Suppl 3):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Chen RY, Byth K (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140(7):1909–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F (2009) Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 41(9):751–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Byth K et al (2015) Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 64(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schenck RJ, Jahann DA, Patrie JT, Stelow EB, Cox DG, Uppal DS, Sauer BG, Shami VM, Strand DS, Wang AY (2017) Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc 31(10):4174–4183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chien H, Imai K, Hotta K, Ito S, Yamaguchi Y, Kawata N, Tanaka M, Takizawa K, Kakushima N, Matsubayashi H et al (2016) Tip-in EMR for R0 resection for a large flat colonic tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 84(4):743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knoop RF, Wedi E, Petzold G, Bremer SCB, Amanzada A, Ellenrieder V, Neesse A, Kunsch S (2020) Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy. Endosc Int Open 8(2):E99–E104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D, Pagano N, Arezzo A, Zullo A, Lorenzetti R, Marmo R (2012) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 44(2):137–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Mandolesi D, Farioli A, Cucchetti A, Frazzoni L, Bhandari P, Bellisario C, Bazzoli F et al (2017) Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 86(1):74–86.e17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N, Galloro G, Manta R, Cirocchi R (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United European Gastroenterol J 4(1):18–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bae JH, Yang DH, Lee S, Soh JS, Lee S, Lee HS, Lee HJ, Park SH, Kim KJ, Ye BD et al (2016) Optimized hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 83(3):584–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Le Roy F, Manfredi S, Hamonic S, Piette C, Bouguen G, Riou F, Bretagne JF (2016) Frequency of and risk factors for the surgical resection of nonmalignant colorectal polyps: a population-based study. Endoscopy 48(3):263–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Zanati S, Williams SJ, Singh R, Moss A, Sonson R, Bourke MJ (2014) Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 80(4):668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilhelm D, von Delius S, Weber L, Meining A, Schneider A, Friess H, Schmid RM, Frimberger E, Feussner H (2009) Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps: 10-year experience and follow-up. Surg Endosc 23(4):688–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilhelm D, Schlag C, Feussner H (2019) Hybridverfahren: Wenn Endoskopie allein nicht ausreicht. Allg Visceralchir Up2date 13(02):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bosch SL, Teerenstra S, de Wilt JH, Cunningham C, Nagtegaal ID (2013) Predicting lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review of risk factors providing rationale for therapy decisions. Endoscopy 45(10):827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of gastrointestinal superficial lesions: follow the guidelines! GE Port J Gastroenterol 22(5):184–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Suh JH, Han KS, Kim BC, Hong CW, Sohn DK, Chang HJ, Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Choi HS et al (2012) Predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 44(6):590–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B, Meining A, Richter-Schrag HJ, Messmann H, Neuhaus H, Albers D, Birk M, Thimme R et al (2018) Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 67(7):1280–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamoto S, Shafazand M (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with scissor-type knife for pedunculated polyp with short and thick stalk. VideoGIE 3(6):189–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, Wruble LD (1985) Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 89(2):328–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nozawa H, Ishihara S, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Ohtani K, Yasuda K, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Tanaka J, Kiyomatsu T et al (2016) Outcome of salvage surgery for colorectal cancer initially treated by upfront endoscopic therapy. Surgery 159(3):713–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—Technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364 (discussion 364–355)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV et al (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(2):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Siani LM, Lucchi A, Berti P, Garulli G (2017) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in 600 right total mesocolectomies: Safety, prognostic factors and oncologic outcome. Am J Surg 214(2):222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland

    C. Schlag

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland

    D. Wilhelm

Authors
  1. C. Schlag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Wilhelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Schlag.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Schlag erhielt Vortrags- und Beraterhonorare von BostonScientific, Medtronic und Olympus. D. Wilhelm gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

A. Dechêne, Nürnberg

M. Fried, Zürich

A. Riphaus, Frankfurt am Main

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlag, C., Wilhelm, D. Resektion neoplastischer Kolonläsionen. Gastroenterologe 15, 376–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-020-00469-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-020-00469-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation