Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study on different sediment transport capacity based on dimensionless flow intensity index

  • Sediments, Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sediment transport plays a vital role in the development of soil erosion process models. The primary purpose of this study is to establish new sediment transport capacity formulas and evaluate their applicability to sediment.

Materials and methods

In this study, we collected three different soil types from Loess Plateau. Simulated sediment transport experiments were carried out in indoor flumes with energy gradients ranging from 6.9 to 20.8% and unit flow discharge rates ranging from 0.00014 to 0.00111 m2 s−1.

Results and discussion

We found an exponential relationship between sediment transport capacity, energy gradients, and unit flow discharge rates. The sediment transport capacity increased with increasing energy gradient and unit flow discharge, and the unit flow discharge had a more significant influence on sediment transport capacity compared with energy gradient. We used each composite force predictor and measured the sediment transport capacity according to the nondimensional principle, and the resulting data corresponded to different soils distributed in zones, as sediment transport capacity is controlled by a critical starting condition. After including soil clay particle content and volume sediment content in our formula, we were able to derive an accurate equation for calculating sediment transport.

Conclusions

Among the dimensionless composite force predictors, the dimensionless effective stream power was the most reliable predictor. The sediment transport capacity and effective stream power were related exponentially (R2 = 0.953).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams AD, Li G, Krishan C, Atkinson JF (2001) A sediment transport equation for interrill overland flow on rough surfaces. Earth Surf Process Landf 26:1443–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams AD, Li G, Parsons AJ (2015) Rill hydraulics on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona. Earth Surf Process Landf 21(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, Boersema M, Peters P (2011) Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 8(4):6939–6965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Sterk G, Seeger M, Boersema M, Peters P (2012) Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(2):591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz NM, Scott DE (1989) Experiments on sediment transport in shallow flows in high gradient channels. Hydrol Sci J 34(4):465–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1966) An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 422–I

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF (1982) ANSWERS user’s manual. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng NS (1997) Simplified settling velocity formula for sediment particle. J Hydraul Eng 123(2):149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBoys MP (1879) Le Rhone et les rivieres a lit affouillable. Annals de Pontset Chaussees 18:141–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Everaert W (1991) Empirical relations for the sediment transport capacity of interrill flow. Earth Surf Process Landf 16(6):513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V (1998) Evaluating overland flow sediment transport capacity. Hydrol Process 12(12):1895–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkner SC, Nearing MA, Foster GR, Gilley JE (1989) A simplified equation for modeling sediment transport capacity. T ASAE 32(5):1545–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan DC, Ascough II JC, Nearing MA, Laflen JM (2001) The water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model. In: Harmon RS, Doe WW (eds) Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling. Springer, Boston, pp 145–199

  • Gimenez R, Govers G (2001) Interaction between bed roughness and flow hydraulics in eroding rills. Water Resour Res 37(3):791–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govers G (1990) Empirical relationships on the transporting capacity of overland flow. Erosion, Transport and Deposition Processes, Proceedings of the Jerusalem Workshop, 1987, IAHS, 189: 45–63

  • Govers G (1992) Evaluation of transporting capacity formulae for overland flow. In: Parsons AJ, Abrahams AD (eds) Overland flow hydraulics and erosion mechanics. University College London Press, London, pp 243–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Govers G, Rauws G (1986) Transporting capacity of overland flow on plane and on irregular beds. Earth Surf Process Landf 11(5):515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy BT, Dickinson WT, Rudra RP, Wall GJ (1990) Hydraulics of sediment-laden sheet flow and the influence of simulated rainfall. Earth Surf Process Landf 15(2):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote AJ, Filstrup CT, Downing JA (2013) Watershed sediment losses to lakes accelerating despite agricultural soil conservation efforts. PLoS One 8(1):e53554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu SX, Abrahams AD (2006) Partitioning resistance to overland flow on rough mobile beds. Earth Surf Process Landf 31(10):1280–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang ZS, Song WJ (1988) An experimental study on the velocity of slop flow. Res Soil Water Conserv 1:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY, Simons DB (1985) Sediment transport capacity of overland flow. T ASAE 28(3):755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilinc, MY (1972) Mechanics of soil erosion from overland flow generated by simulated rainfall. Dissertation, Colorado State University

  • Lal R (1998) Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environment quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17(4):319–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Li D, Wang X (2011) An approach to estimating sediment transport capacity of overland flow. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 54(10):2649–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Fu B, Lü Y, Wang Z, Gao G (2012) Hydrological responses and soil erosion potential of abandoned cropland in the China. Geomorphology 138(1):404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Ghadiri H, Rose C et al (2014) Evaluation of GUEST and WEPP with a new approach for the determination of sediment transport capacity. J Hydrol 513:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merten GH, Nearing MA, Borges ALO (2001) Effect of sediment load on soil detachment and deposition in rills. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(3):861–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misra PK, Rose CW (1996) Application and sensitivity analysis of process-based erosion model GUEST. Eur J Soil Sci 47(4):593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Sediment transport capacity of sheet and rill flow: application of unit stream power theory. Water Resour Res 22(8):1350–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Styczen ME (1998) The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landf 23(6):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology. T ASAE 32(5):1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Norton LD, Bulgakov DA, Larionov GA, West LT, Dontsova KM (1997) Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills. Water Resour Res 33(4):865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Simanton JR, Norton LD, Bulygin SJ, Stone J (1999) Soil erosion by surface water flow on a stony, semiarid hillslope. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser IP, Rustomji P (2000) Sediment transport capacity relations for overland flow. Prog Phys Geogr 24(2):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin C, Zheng FL, Zhang XCJ, Xu XM, Liu G (2018) A simulation of rill bed incision processes in upland concentrated flows. Catena 165:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sha YQ (1965) Introduction to Sediment Movement. China Industry Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

  • Takken I, Govers G, Ciesiolka CAA, Silburn DM, Loch RJ (1998) Factors influencing the velocity-discharge relationship in rills. IAHS Publ, Wallingford, pp 63–70

  • Wang WZ, Jiao JY (2002) Temporal and spatial variation features of sediment yield intensity on loess plateau. Acta Geograph Sin 57(2):210–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yang X, Liu J, Yuan Y (2015) Sediment transport capacity and its response to hydraulic parameters in experimental rill flow on steep slope. J Soil Water Conserv 70(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Wang ZL, Shen N, Wang S (2016) Modelling sediment transport capacity of rill flow for loess sediments on steep slopes. Catena 147:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang CT (1972) Unit stream power and sediment transport. J Hydraul Div 98(10):1805–1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CT (1973) Incipient motion and sediment transport. J Hydraul Div 99(10):1679–1704

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Liu BY, Zhang XC (2008) Applicability of WEPP sediment transport equation to steep slopes. T ASABE 51(5):1675–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Liu YM, Han YF, Zhang XC (2009) Sediment transport and soil detachment on steep slopes: I. transport capacity estimation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1291–1297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Wang LL, Tang KM, Luo RT, Zhang XC (2011) Effects of sediment size on transport capacity of overland flow on steep slopes. Hydrol Sci J 56(7):1289–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G, Mu X, Wen Z, Wang F, Gao P (2013) Soil erosion, conservation, and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degrad Dev 24(5):499–510

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51579214, 41877076, 41671276), Fundamental Research Business Expenses of Central Universities (2452017321), Science and Technology Project of Yangling Demonstration Zone (2017NY-03), and Post-doctoral Supporting Fund of Shaanxi Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuandi Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Paolo Porto

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Zhang, K., Wu, S. et al. Comparative study on different sediment transport capacity based on dimensionless flow intensity index. J Soils Sediments 20, 2289–2305 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02568-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02568-5

Keywords

Navigation