Abstract
Purpose
The industrial ecosystem identified in and around the Campbell Industrial Park in Honolulu County, Hawai’i involves 11 facilities exchanging water, materials, and energy across an industrial cluster. This paper highlights the advantages of this arrangement using life cycle assessment to determine the energy and environmental costs and benefits of the existing pattern of exchanges.
Methods
A consequential approach was used to evaluate each material substitution for four environmental impact categories: primary energy use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, acidification, and eutrophication. Each material exchange included avoided production and reduced use of virgin materials, any necessary pre-processing or transportation of local by-products, and avoided treatment or disposal of these by-products.
Results and discussion
All exchanges exhibited positive net savings across all environmental impact categories, with the exceptions of waste oil and tire-derived fuel burned as substitutes for coal. The greatest savings occur as a result of sharing steam between a combined cycle fuel oil-fired cogeneration plant and a nearby refinery. In total, the environmental savings realized by this industrial cluster are significant, equivalent to 25 % of the state’s policy goal for reducing the industrial component of GHG emissions over the next decade. The role of policy in supporting material and energy exchanges is also discussed as the central cluster of two power plants and two refineries share steam and water in part under regulatory requirements.
Conclusions
The results show environmental benefits of the sharing of by-product resources accrued on a life cycle basis, while for the local context, the reduction of imported fuels and materials helps to reduce the external dependency of Oahu’s remote island economy. The environmental benefits of materials exchanges are often ignored in energy policy, though, as in this case, they can represent considerable savings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baas LW, Boons FA (2004) An industrial ecology project in practice: exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems. J Clean Prod 12(8–10):1073–1085
Bare J (2011) TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13(5):687–696
Boughton B, Horvath A (2004) Environmental assessment of used oil management methods. Environ Sci Technol 38(2):353–358
Chen YC, Liu TY, Yen JH, Li YH, Chiu CM, Lai YY, Wu TC (2011) Environmental synergies of Kaohsiung ESTP in Taiwan. Sustain Environ Res 21(3):203–208
Chertow MR, Lombardi DR (2005) Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environ Sci Technol 39(17):6535–6541
Chertow M, Miyata Y (2011) Assessing collective firm behavior: comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI. Bus Strat Environ 20(4):266–280
Côté R, Cohen-Rosenthal E (1998) Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences. J Clean Prod 6:181–188
Eckelman MJ, Chertow MR (2009a) Quantifying life cycle environmental benefits from the reuse of industrial materials in Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol 43(7):2550
Eckelman MJ, Chertow MR (2009b) Using material flow analysis to illuminate long-term waste management solutions in Oahu, HI, USA. J Ind Ecol 13(5):758–774
Eckelman MJ, Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2008) Spatial assessment of net mercury emissions from the use of fluorescent bulbs. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8564–8570
Ecoinvent (2010) Ecoinvent database for life cycle analysis of emissions and materials, data vers. 2.2. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, Switzerland
Ekvall T, Weidema B (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(3):161–171
Fiksel J (2003) Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5330–5339
Jacobsen NB (2006) Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark—a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):239–255
Lin T-C, Lee C-Y, Liao W-T, Mi H-H, Chang S-S, Chang J-E, Chao C-C (2012) CO2 emissions from a steel mill and a petro-chemical industry. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12(6):1409–1420
Maruyama N, Eckelman MJ (2009) Long-term trends of electric efficiencies in electricity generation in developing countries. Energy Policy 37(5):1678–1686
Mattila T, Lehtoranta S, Sokka L, Melanen M, Nissinen A (2012) Methodological aspects of applying life cycle assessment to industrial symbioses. J Ind Ecol 16(1):51–60
NETL (2007) Coal Power Plant Database. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/hold/technology.html. Accessed 1 May 2013
NREL (2012) U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. U.S. Department of Energy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search. Accessed 1 May 2013
Shi H, Chertow M, Song Y (2010) Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China. J Clean Prod 18(3):191–199
Siler-Evans K, Azevedo IL, Morgan MG (2012) Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4742–4748
Sokka L, Lehtoranta S, Nissinen A, Melanen M (2011) Analyzing the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis. J Ind Ecol 15(1):137–155
Sousa J, Way G, Carlson D (2001) Cost benefit analysis and energy consumption of scrap tire management options. Beneficial Use of Recycled Materials in Transportation Applications. Air & Waste Management Association
Thomassen M, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, de Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(4):339–349
Tian J, Guo Q, Chen Y, Li X, Shi H, Chen L (2013) Study on industrial metabolism of carbon in a Chinese fine chemical industrial park. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):1048–0156
US EIA (2012) Electric power annual. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
US EPA (2009) AP-42, compilation of air pollutant emissions factors, 5th edn, revised, volume 1: Stationary and Point Sources. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US EPA (2012) Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) 2012 v1.0. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
van Beers D, Corder G, Bossilkov A, van Berkel R (2007) Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry—the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone. J Ind Ecol 11(1):55–72
van Berkel R, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Fujii M (2009) Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environ Sci Technol 43(5):1271–1281
Weber C, Jaramillo P, Marriott J, Samaras C (2010) Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? Environ Sci Technol 44(6):1895–1901
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Wulf-Peter Schmidt
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckelman, M.J., Chertow, M.R. Life cycle energy and environmental benefits of a US industrial symbiosis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1524–1532 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0601-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0601-5