Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil organic matter accounting in the carbon footprint analysis of the wine chain

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Concerns about global warming led to the calculation of the carbon footprint (CF) left by human activities. The agricultural sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, though cropland soils can also act as sinks. So far, most LCA studies on agricultural products have not considered changes in soil organic matter (SOM). This paper aimed to: (1) integrate the Hénin–Dupuis SOM model into the CF study and (2) outline the impacts of different vineyard soil management scenarios on the overall CF.

Methods

A representative wine chain in the Maremma Rural District, Tuscany (Italy), made up of a cooperative winery and nine of its associated farms, was selected to investigate the production of a non-aged, high-quality red wine. The system boundary was established from vineyard planting to waste management after use. The functional unit (FU) chosen for this study was a 0.75-L bottle of wine, and all data refer to the year 2009. The SOM balance, based on Hénin–Dupuis’ equation, was integrated and run using GaBi4 software. A sensitivity analysis was performed, and four scenarios were developed to assess the impact of vineyard soil management types with decreasing levels of organic matter inputs.

Results and discussion

SOM accounting reduced the overall CF of one wine bottle from 0.663 to 0.531 kg CO2-eq/FU. The vineyard planting sub-phase produced a loss of SOM while, in the pre-production and production sub-phases, the loss/accumulation of SOM was related to the soil management practices. On average, soil management in the production sub-phase led to a net accumulation of SOM, and the overall vineyard phase was a sink of CO2. Residue incorporation and grassing were identified as the main factors affecting changes in SOM in vineyard soils.

Conclusions

Our results showed that incorporating SOM accounting into the wine chain’s CF analysis changed the vineyard phase from a GHG source to a modest net GHG sink. These results highlighted the need to include soil C dynamics in the CF of the agricultural product. Here, the SOM balance method proposed was sensitive to changes in management practices and was site specific. Moreover, we were also able to define a minimum data set for SOM accounting.

The EU recognises soil carbon sequestration as one of the major European strategies for mitigation. However, specific measures have yet to be included in the CAP 2020. It would be desirable to include soil in the new ISO 14067—Carbon Footprint of Products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andren O, Katterer T, Karlsson T (2004) ICBM regional model for estimations of dynamics of agricultural soil carbon pools. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 70:231–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andriulo A, Mary B, Guerif J (1999) Modelling soil carbon dynamics with various cropping sequences on the rolling pampas. Agronomie 19:365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranda A, Scarpellini S, Zabalza I (2005) Economic and environmental analysis of the wine bottle production in Spain by means of life cycle assessment. Int J Agr Resour Govern Ecol 4:178–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F, Beccali G, Cellura M, Marvuglia A (2006) POEMS: a case study of an Italian wine-producing firm. Environ Manage 38:350–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamides M, Fatta D (2008) Resource consumption and emissions from olive oil production: a life cycle inventory case study in Cyprus. J Clean Prod 16:809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala A, Raugei M, Benveniste G, Gazulla C, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2010) Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:489–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer C, Lovato T, Dieckow J, Zanatta J, Mielniczuk J (2006) A method for estimating coefficients of soil organic matter dynamics based on long-term experiments. Soil Till Res 91:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechini L, Castoldi N (2009) On-farm monitoring of economic and environmental performances of cropping systems: results of a 2-year study at the field scale in northern Italy. Ecol Indic 9:1096–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechini L, Castoldi N, Stein A (2011) Sensitivity to information upscaling of agro-ecological assessments: application to soil organic carbon management. Agr Syst 104:480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Sacco D, Monaco S, Grignani C (2009) Soil organic matter dynamics and losses in manured maize-based forage systems. Eur J Agron 30:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C, Girardin P (2003) Mode de Calcul des Indicateurs Agrienvironmentaux de la Methode INDIGO. Version 1.61 du Logiciel. Unpublished INRA Internal Technical Report, Colmar, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller C, Guichard L, Makowski D, Aveline A, Girardin P, Plantureux S (2008) Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiffin J, Keli Zagbahi J, Sebillotte M (1986) Systèmes de culture et statut organique des sols dans le Noyonnais: application du modèle de Hénin–Dupuis. Agronomie 6:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco S, Di Bene C, Galli M, Remorini D, Massai R, Bonari E (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Ita J Agron 6:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão M, Milà I, Canals L, Clift R (2011) Soil organic carbon changes in the cultivation of energy crops: implications for GHG balances and soil quality for use in LCA. Biomass Bioenerg 35:2323–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brentrup F, Kusters J, Kuhlmann H, Lammel J (2004) Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. Eur J Agron 20:265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2008) PAS 2050:2008—specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI British Standards, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011—specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI British Standards, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle E, Smart D, Williams LE, Summers M (2010) California vineyard greenhouse gas emissions: assessment of the available literature and determination of research needs. California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance. California, p 51, www.sustainablewinegrowing.org

  • Coll P, Le Cadre E, Blanchart E, Hinsinger P, Villenave C (2011) Organic viticulture and soil quality: a long-term study in Southern France. Appl Soil Ecol 50:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman T, Päster P (2009) Red, white, and ‘green’: the cost of greenhouse gas emissions in the global wine trade. Journal of Wine Research 20:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell SJ, Clift R (1997) Impact assessment for LCAs involving agricultural production. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell SJ, Clift R (2000) A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 8:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley JLB (1993) Density and compressibility. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Louis, Boca Raton, pp 529–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Bene C, Tavarini S, Mazzoncini M, Angelini LG (2011) Changes in soil chemical parameters and organic matter balance after 13 years of ramie [Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud.] cultivation in the Mediterranean region. Eur J Agron 35:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater LE, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M (1998) Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2009) Climate change: Commission dishes the dirt on the importance of soil. EC Communication IP/09/353 Brussels, 5 March 2009, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/353

  • EcoInvent Centre (2007) EcoInvent data v2.0. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller C, Bernoux M (2008) Historical advances in the study of global terrestrial soil organic carbon sequestration. Waste Manage 28:734–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting-opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth K, Oemcke D (2008) International Wine Carbon Calculator Protocol Version 1.2. Provisor Pty Ltd and Yalumba Wines, Hartley Grove, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia p. 152. www.wfa.org.au/PDF/International_Wine_Carbon_Calculator_ProtocolV1.2.pdf

  • Fregoni M (1989) La viticoltura biologica: basi scientifiche e prospettive. Vignevinin 12:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • GaBi4 (2007a). GaBi 4 software. http://gabi-software.com

  • GaBi4 (2007b) GaBi professional database. http://documentation.gabi-software.com

  • Gazulla C, Raugei M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2010) Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks? Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:330–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Udo de Haes HA, Van der Voet E, Wrisberg MN (2002) Life cycle assessment. An operational Guide to ISO Standards, vol 1–3. Centre of Environmental Science Leiden University Ed, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass G, Wetterich F, Geier U (2000) Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on farm level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes P, Battaglene T (2006) Regulatory Response to climate change. Le Bulletin de L’OIV. Organisation Internationale de La Vigne et du Vigne 79:697–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénin S, Dupuis M (1945) Essai de bilan de la matière organique du sol. Ann Agron 15:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J, Hawes C, Squire G, Hilton A, Wale S, Smith P (2009a) The carbon footprints of food crop production. Int J Agric Sustain 7:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J, Whittaker C, Dailey G, Aylott M, Casella E, Gm R, Riche A, Murphy R, Taylor G, Smith P (2009b) Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses. GCB Bioenergy 1:267–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2006) Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IGES, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Ciais P, Smith P, Nabuurs GJ, Folberth G, Schlamadinger B, Hutjes RWA, Ceulemans R, Schulze ED, Valentini R, Dolman AJ (2003) Europe’s terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12 % of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300:1538–1542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS (1990) The turnover of organic-carbon and nitrogen in soil. Philos T Roy Soc B 329:361–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Rayner JH (1977) The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Sci 123:298–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley KE (2011) Applying new methods for estimating in vivo vineyard carbon storage. Am J Enol Viticult 62:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemanian AR, Manoranjan VS, Huggins DR, Stöckle CO (2005) Assessing the usefulness of simple mathematical models to describe soil carbon dynamics. Third USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerber GR, Edwards-Jones G, Hill PW, Milà I, Canals L, Nyeko P, York EH, Jones DL (2009) Geographical variation in carbon dioxide fluxes from soils in agro-ecosystems and its implications for life-cycle assessment. J Appl Ecol 46:306–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DA, Field CB (2006) Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980–2000 Ecol Appl 16:1975–1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos T Roy Soc B 363:815–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Frolking S, Frolking TA (1992a) A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 1. Model structure and sensitivity. J Geophys Res 97:9759–9776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Frolking S, Frolking TA (1992b) A model of nitrous oxide evolution from soil driven by rainfall events: 2. Model applications. J Geophys Res 97:9777–9783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland P, Webb J (2003) Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil Till Res 70:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manlay RJ, Feller C, Swift MJ (2007) Historical evolution of soil organic matter concepts and their relationships with the fertility and sustainability of cropping systems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 119:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary B, Guérif J (1994) Intérêts et limites des modèles de prevision de l’évolution des matières organiques et de l’azote dans le sol. Cah Agric 3:247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews A (2011) Post-2013 EU Common Agricultural Policy, Trade and Development: A Review of LegislativeProposals”; ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development; Issue Paper No.39; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, www.ictsd.org

  • Meisterling K, Samaras C, Schweizer V (2009) Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. J Clean Prod 17:222–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milà I, Canals L, Burnip GM, Cowell SJ (2006) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of apple production using life cycle assessment (LCA): case study in New Zealand. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà I, Canals L, Romanya J, Cowell S (2007) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of “fertile land” in life cycle assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlat R, Chaussod R (2008) Long-term additions of organic amendments in a Loire Valley Vineyard. Effects on properties of a calcareous sandy soil. Am J Enol Viticult 59:353–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mourad AL, Coltro L, Oliveira PAPLV, Kletecke RM, Baddini JPO (2007) A simple methodology for elaborating the life cycle inventory of agricultural products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wenk R, Brandão M (2010) Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, Secondth edn. Agronomy Monograph 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 539–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Erzinger S (2005) Modelling representative life cycle inventories for Swiss arable crops. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemecek T, Dubois D, Huguenin-Elie O, Gaillard G (2011) Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming. Agr Syst 104:217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Nicoletti M (2003) LCA of wine production. In: Mattsonn B, Sonesson U (eds) Environmentally-friendly food processing. Woodhead, Cambridge, pp 306–326

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parat C, Chaussod R, Leveque J, Dousset S, Andreux F (2002) The relationship between copper accumulation in vineyard calcareous soils and soil organic matter and iron. Eur J Soil Sci 53:663–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petti L, Ardente F, Bosco S, De Camillis C, Masotti P, Pattara P, Raggi A, Tassielli G (2010) State of the art of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the wine industry. 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the agri-food sector”, Bari, Italy, September 22–24 2010, pp 493–498

  • Pittock B, Arthington A, Booth T, Cowell P, Hennesy K, Howden M, Hughes L, Jones R, Lake S, Lyne V, McMichael T, Mullet T, Nicholls N, Torok S, Woodruf R (2003) Climate change: an Australian guide to the science and potential impacts. Australian Greenhouse Oice, Canberra, p 239

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzigallo CI, Granai C, Borsa S (2008) The joint use of LCA and energy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. J Environ Manage 86:396–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Point EV (2008) Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia. MSc Thesis, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

  • Ponsioen TC, Blonk TJ (2011) Calculating land use change in carbon footprints of agricultural products as an impact of current land use. J Clean Prod Available online 21 October 2011

  • Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Röös E, Sundberg C, Hansson PA (2000) Uncertainties in the carbon footprint of food products: a case study on table potatoes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:478–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinden G (2009) The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:195–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O'Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O, Howden M, McAllister T, Pan G, Romanenkov V, Schneider U, Towprayoon S, Wattenbach M, Smith J (2008) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos T Roy Soc B 363:789–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sofo A, Nuzzo V, Palese AM, Xiloyannis C, Celano G, Zukowskyj P, Dichio B (2005) Net CO2 storage in Mediterranean olive and peach orchards. Sci Hortic 107:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. USDA-SCS Agric. Handb. 436. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC

  • Soja G, Zehetner F, Rampazzo–Todorovic G, Schildberger B, Hackl K, Hofmann R, Burger E, Omann I (2010) Wine production under climate change conditions: mitigation and adaptation options from the vineyard to the sales booth. 9th European IFSA Symposium, 4–7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria) Proceeding pp 1368–1378. Proceedings Edited by: Ika Darnhofer and Michaela Grötzer Vienna, July 2010 University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna ISBN 9783200019089

  • Steenwerth K, Belina KM (2008) Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 40:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb LB, Whetton PH, Barlow EWR (2007) Impact on Australian Viticulture from Greenhouse Induced Temperature Change. In: Zerger A, Argent RM (eds) MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp 1504–1510

  • Weidema BP, Thrane M, Christensen P, Schmidt J, Løkke S (2008) Carbon footprint: a catalyst for life cycle assessment? J Ind Ecol 12:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T (2009) Editorial: carbon footprint and input–output analysis—an introduction. Econ Syst Res 21:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright LA, Kemp S, Williams I (2011) ‘Carbon footprinting’: towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management 2:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the wine growers for their participation in this project, and for providing us extensive information about their agricultural and wine production systems. This research was funded by the Italian Institute for Foreign Trade and by the local government of the Province of Grosseto, Italy. We thank the reviewers for their thorough review and clear comments which significantly contributed to improving the quality of the paper. Many thanks to Dr. Rachel Spencer for the English revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, P.zza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy

    Simona Bosco, Claudia Di Bene, Mariassunta Galli & Enrico Bonari

  2. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Damiano Remorini & Rossano Massai

Authors
  1. Simona Bosco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Di Bene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariassunta Galli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Damiano Remorini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rossano Massai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enrico Bonari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona Bosco.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gérard Gaillard

Simona Bosco and Claudia Di Bene contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosco, S., Di Bene, C., Galli, M. et al. Soil organic matter accounting in the carbon footprint analysis of the wine chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 973–989 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0567-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0567-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation