Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments

  • Published:
The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15 old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000. While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship. Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z.J., Arenius, P., Hay, M. & Minniti, M. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 executive report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College & London: London Business School.

  • Audretsch, D.B., Carree, M.A., van Stel, A.J. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty. Kyklos, 55(1): 81–97.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., Carree, M.A., Thurik, A.R. & van Stel, A.J. 2005. Does self-employment reduce unemployment. Discussion paper D5057. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

  • Audretsch, D.B. & Thurik, A.R. 2001. What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1): 267– 315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2: 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, H. 1989. The entrepreneur in economic theory; Disappearance and explanation. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. 1990. Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72: 551–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. 1968. Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 58(2): 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. & Noorderhaven, N. 2005. Personality characteristics of self-employed; An empirical study. Small Business Economics, 24: 159–167.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G. 2004. Self-employment: More may not be better. Working Paper 10286. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Blanchflower, D.G. & Meyer, B.D. 1994. A longitudinal analysis of the young self-employed in Australia and the United States. Small Business Economics, 6: 1–19.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G. & Oswald, A.J. 1998. What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1): 26–60.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A. & Stutzer, A. 2001. Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45: 680–691.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, D. 1987. A time-series analysis of self-employment in the US. Journal of Political Economy, 95: 445– 467.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I. & Willard, G.E. 1993. Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 183–195.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M., Stel, A., van, Thurik, A.R. & Wennekers, S. 2002. Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19(3): 271–290.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R. 2003. The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D.B. Audretsch & Z.J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: 437–471. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R. 2006. The handbook of entrepreneurship and economic growth (international library of entrepreneurship). Cheltenham, UK and Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, forthcoming.

  • Casson, M.C. 1982. The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A.C. & Dunkelberg, W.C. 1987. Entrepreneurial research: Old questions, new answers and methodological issues. American Journal of Small Business, 1: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressy, R. 1999. The Evans and Jovanovic equivalence theorem and credit rationing: Another look. Small Business Economics, 12: 295–297.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. 2004. Researching entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Boston etc: Springer Science Inc.

  • Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 301–331.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Delmar, F. & Davidsson, P. 2000. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, E.J. & Shepherd, D.A. 2002. Self-employment as a career choice: Attitudes, entrepreneurial intentions, and utility maximization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3): 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S. & Jovanovic, B. 1989. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97: 808–827.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S. 1989. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79: 519–535.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S. & Leighton, L.S. 1990. Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2: 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilo, I. & Irigoyen, J.M. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, forthcoming.

  • Grilo, I. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. Entrepreneurship in Europe. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 30–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  • Grilo, I. & Thurik, A.R. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the old and the new Europe. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  • Hébert, R.F. & Link, A.N. 1989. In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B.A. 1994. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. 1999. Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics, 11: 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouriloff, M. 2000. Exploring perceptions of a priori barriers to entrepreneurship: A multidisciplinary approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2): 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Picot, G. & Compton, J. 2000. The entry and exit dynamics of self-employment in Canada. Small Business Economics, 15: 105–125.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21: 135–172.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., Arenius, P. & Langowitz, N. 2005. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2004 report on women and entrepreneurship. Centre for Women's Leadership at Babson College/London Business School.

  • OECD. 1998. Fostering entrepreneurship, the OECD jobs strategy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2000. OECD Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praag, M.C. van. 1999. Some classic views on entrepreneurship. De Economist, 147: 311–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H. & Shah, A. 1986. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the UK. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D. 1997. Who starts new firms?—Preliminary explorations of firms-in-gestation. Small Business Economics, 9: 449–462.

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P.D., Hay, M. & Camp, S.M. 1999. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 1999 executive report. Babson College, London Business School and the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

  • Reynolds, P.D., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E., Cox, L.W. & Hay, M. 2002. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2002 executive report, Babson College, London Business School and Kauffman Foundation.

  • Robinson, P.B. & Sexton, E.A. 1994. The effect of education and experience on self-employment success. Journal of Business Venturing, 9: 141–156.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, A.J. van & Stunnenberg, V. 2004. Linking business ownership and perceived administrative complexity: An empirical analysis of 18 OECD countries. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 35–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  • Stel, A. van. 2005. COMPENDIA: Harmonizing business ownership data across countries and over time. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1: 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, A. van, Storey, D., Thurik, A.R. & Wennekers, S. 2005. From nascent to actual entrepreneurship: The effect of entry barriers. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany, forthcoming.

  • Storey, D.J. 1994. Understanding the small business sector. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D.J. 2003. Entrepreneurship, small and medium sized enterprises and public policies. In D.B. Audretsch and Z.J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: 476–511. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2004. Post-materialism: A cultural factor influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy no 07–2004. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.

  • Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In D.B. Audretsch, A.R. Thurik, I. Verheul, and A.R.M. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a european-US comparison: 11–81. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2005. Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 483–518.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., Stel, A. van. & Thurik, A.R. 2006. Explaining female and male entrepreneurship across 29 countries. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, forthcoming.

  • Wagner, J. 2003. Testing lazear's jack-of-all-trades view of entrepreneurship with German micro data. Applied Economics Letters, 10: 687–689.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, A.R.M. & Thurik, A.R. 1999. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13: 27–55.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, A.R.M., Uhlaner, L. & Thurik, A.R. 2002. Entrepreneurship and its conditions: A macro perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1): 25–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, G. de & Winden, F.A.A.M. van. 1989. An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 1: 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DG Enterprise, European Commission, B-1049, Brussels, Belgium

    Isabel Grilo

  2. Gremars, Université de Lille 3 and CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain, France

    Isabel Grilo

  3. Centre for Advanced Small Business Economics, Rotterdam School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, Rotterdam, DR, The Netherlands

    Roy Thurik

  4. EIM Business and Policy Research, P.O. Box 7001, 2701, Zoetermeer, AA, The Netherlands

    Roy Thurik

  5. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany

    Roy Thurik

Authors
  1. Isabel Grilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy Thurik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy Thurik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grilo, I., Thurik, R. Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments. Entrepreneurship Mgt. 1, 441–459 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4772-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4772-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation