Abstract
In view of the possible dust pollution of atmospheric caused by large open-air piles, a scheme of using butterfly porous fences is proposed. Based on the actual cause of large open-air piles, this study makes an in-depth study on the wind shielding effect of butterfly porous fences. The effects of hole shape and bottom gap on the flow characteristics are investigated behind the butterfly porous fence with the porosity of 0.273 through the combined methods of computational fluid dynamics and validating PIV experiments. The streamlines distribution and X-velocity behind the porous fence of numerical simulation are in good agreement with the experimental results and based on the research group’s previous work, the numerical model is feasible. The concept of the wind reduction ratio is proposed to quantitatively evaluate the wind shielding effect of the porous fence. The results show that the butterfly porous fence with circular holes provided the best shelter effect with the wind reduction ratio of 78.34%, and the optimal bottom gap ratio is about 0.075 with the highest wind reduction ratio of 80.1%. When a butterfly porous fence is applied on site, the diffusion range of dust in open-air piles is significantly reduced compared with that without a fence. In conclusion, the circular holes with the bottom gap ratio of 0.075 are suitable for the butterfly porous fence in practical applications and provide a solution for wind-induced control in large open-air piles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Caterina L, Antonella P (2018) Particulate matter air pollution and respiratory impact on humans and animals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33901–33910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3344-9
Chalvatzaki E, Aleksandropoulou V, Glytsos T, Lazaridis M (2012) The effect of dust emissions from open storage piles to particle ambient concentration and human exposure. Waste Manag 32:2456–2468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.06.005
Chen XJ, Liu QZ, Yuan C, Sheng T (2019) Emission characteristics of fine particulate matter from ultralow emission power plants. Environ Pollut 225:113157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113157
Duan ZY, Yang WX, Li PF, Zhu YX (2011) Effect of porosity on the flow characteristics behind planar and non-planar porous fences. Commun Inf Sci Manage Eng 1:15–21. https://doi.org/10.5963/CISME0110004
Duan ZY, Dong YY, Zheng FL, Zhang JM (2012) Numerical simulation and experimental verification of butterfly porous fences. Key Eng Mater 501:413–417. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.501.413
Duan ZY, Wang Y, Jiao QH, Wang J, Liu YZ (2021) Local dispersion characteristics of dust in large open-air piles under the action of one-way wind. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:47182–47195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13998-0
Guo L, Zhao DS, Zhao B, Li J (2020) Bio-inspired design and evaluation of porous fences for mitigating fugitive dust. J Bionic Eng 17:370–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0030-7
Hilton JE, Cleary PW (2013) Dust modelling using a combined CFD and discrete element formulation. Int J Numer M-Ethods Fluids 72:528–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.3750
Hong SW, Lee IB, Seo IH (2015) Modelling and predicting wind velocity patterns for wind break fence design. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 142:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.007
Huang CH, Lee C, Tasi CJ (2005) Reduction of particle reentrainment using porous fence in front of dust samples. J Environ Eng 131:1644–1648. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1644)
Jeong SH, Lee SH (2020) Effects of windbreak forest according to tree species and planting methods based on wind tunnel experiments. For Ind Sci Technol 16:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1823896
Kim HB, Lee SJ (2001) Hole diameter effect on flow characteristics of wake behind porous fences having the same porosity. Fluid Dyn Res 28:449–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5983(01)00010-7
Kim HB, Lee SJ (2002) The structure of turbulent shear flow around a two-dimensional porous fence having a bottom gap. J Fluids Struct 16:317–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.2001.0423
Langman JB, Behrens D, Moberly JG (2020) Seasonal formation and stability of dissolved metal particles in mining-impacted, lacustrine sediments. J Contam Hydrol 232:103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103655
Li B, Sherman DJ (2015) Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences: a review. Aeolian Res 17:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.11.005
Li JL, Dong JP, Chen GH, Wang WW (2009) Influence of opening form of windproof and dust suppression net on flow field. J Environ Eng 3:1725–1728
McClure S, Kim JJ, Lee SJ, Zhang W (2017) Shelter effects of porous multi-scale fractal fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 163:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.01.007
McClure JE, Ramstad T, Li Z, Armstrong RT, Berg S (2020) Modeling geometric state for fluids in porous media: evolution of the Euler characteristic. Transp Porous Media 133:229–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-020-01420-1
Mustafa M, Xu YZ, Haritos G, Kenji K (2016) Measurement of wind flow behavior at the leeward side of porous fences using ultrasonic anemometer device. Energy Procedia 85:350–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.261
Nejatian A, Makian M, Gheibi M, Fathollahi-Fard AM (2022) A novel viewpoint to the green city concept basedon vegetation area changes and contributions to healthy days: a case study of Mashhad, Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:702–710. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-523829/v1
Park CW, Lee SJ (2001) The effects of a bottom gap and non-uniform porosity in a wind fence on the surface pressure of a triangular prism located behind the fence. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 89:1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00105-2
Prashanth J, Harish N (2019) Numerical modelling of shelter effect of porous wind fences. Wind Struct 29:313–321
Song CF, Peng L, Cao JJ, Mu L, Bai HL (2014) Numerical simulation of airflow structure and dust emissions behind porous fences used to shelter open storage piles. Aerosol Air Qual Res 14:1584–1592. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.11.0331
Torabi A, Moosavirad SH, Ariafar S, Eftekhari A (2021) Dust emission reduction in iron ore concentrate production plantusing value engineering method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:37647–37660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13331-9
Tositti L, Brattich E, Masiol M, Baldacci D (2014) Source apportionment of particulate matter in a large cityof southeastern Po Valley (Bologna, Italy). Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:872–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1911-7
Wang G, Deng JG, Ma ZZ, Hao JM, Jiang JK (2018) Characteristics of filterable and condensable particulate matter emitted from two waste incineration power plants in China. Sci Total Environ 639:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.105
Wu XX, Zou XY, Zhou N, Zhang CL, Shi S (2015) Deceleration efficiencies of shrub windbreaks in a wind tunnel. Aeolian Res 16:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.10.004
Xu YZ, Rajnish KC, Mohamad YM (2020) Feasibility of computational fluid dynamics for analyzing air-flow around porous fences. Heat Transfer Eng 41:497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2018.1546663
Yeh CP, Tsai CH, Yang RJ (2010) An investigation into the sheltering performance of porous windbreaks under various wind directions. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 98:520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.04.002
Zhou L, Yang SY, Yuan ZL, Yang LJ, Wu H (2018) Inhibition of fine particles fugitive emission from the open-pit lignite mines by polymer aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf A 555:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.07.014
Zhou Q, Xu G, Chen YP, Qin BT (2020) The development of an optimized evaluation system for improving coal dust suppression efficiency using aqueous solution sprays. Colloids Surf A 602:125105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125104
Zou CF (2021) Analysis on dust control technology in open-pit quarry. J Energy Nat Resour 10:28–32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20211001.13
Funding
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2013CB430001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Simulation: Qiheng Jiao. Experiment: Yan Wang. Data reduction: Junmei Zhang and Hongyan Zhai. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhenya Duan. All the authors commented on the previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors contributed to reviewing and editing according to the reviewer’s comments. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This is not applicable.
Consent for publication
This is not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Duan, Z., Jiao, Q., Wang, Y. et al. Effects of hole shape and bottom gap on the flow characteristics behind butterfly porous fence and its application in dust diffusion control in large open-air piles. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 56148–56160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26293-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26293-x