Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evaluation of the spatial rationality of provincial territory: a case study of Gansu Province

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In China, utilization and evaluation of territorial space have become national strategic issues. Evaluating the rationality of urban, ecological, and agricultural space is significant in the development of territorial space and provides a theoretical basis for the optimization of provincial territorial space. The strategic positioning of Gansu Province as a national ecological environment safety barrier is significant to the protection of the ecological environment of northwest China. This study used the entropy method to evaluate the rationality of territorial space development in 14 cities in Gansu Province in 2019, using 50 indicators of urban, ecological, and agricultural space. Results reveal that in the evaluation of these three spaces, the most important influencing indicators are water supply penetration rate, proportion of desert area, and proportion of agricultural population, respectively. In the total evaluation of territorial space rationality, the city with the highest comprehensive index is Qingyang (2.0521), followed by Zhangye (1.5635), while Lanzhou (1.1553) has the lowest evaluation. In Gansu, cities with the best territorial spatial conditions are concentrated in the east, whereas those with poor territorial spatial environmental security are located in central Gansu and the Hexi Corridor. Collectively, these findings suggest that the equity and rationality of urban, ecological, and agricultural space in territorial space should be considered in territorial space planning strategies. The balance and harmony of these three spaces play a positive role in the sustainable development of the economy, society, and the environment in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province (20JR10RA286).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jinxiang Wang, Hao Liu, and Panliang Liu contributed to the conception of the study, collected data, and wrote the manuscript. Guohua Chang helped perform the analysis and provided constructive insight.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinxiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Liu, H., Liu, P. et al. An evaluation of the spatial rationality of provincial territory: a case study of Gansu Province. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 18268–18284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23258-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23258-4

Keywords

Navigation