Abstract
China needs to achieve its carbon peaking target with minimal economic costs. This paper proposes a framework for achieving the carbon peaking target that emphasizes economic effects. Based on the prediction, the parametric directional distance function (DDF) is adopted to calculate the total factor carbon emission efficiency and marginal carbon abatement cost in each region of China before 2030, and the allocation scheme of the abatement tasks necessary for carbon peaking is optimized from the perspective of least cost. The empirical results show the following: (1) The predicted rapid growth of China’s economy from 2020 to 2030 will lead to a rapid increase in marginal abatement costs, with the average marginal carbon abatement cost increasing from 8,833 yuan/ton to 15,077 yuan/ton. The cost of carbon emission reduction in the future is very expensive. (2) The measured marginal abatement costs in China are positively correlated with carbon emission efficiency. In order to ensure economic development, developed regions should try to maintain the development trend, while the central and western regions take on more emission reduction tasks. (3) The emission efficiency is improved by optimizing the allocation scheme of the abatement tasks required to reach the peak, and the scientific and orderly path to reach the peak of each province and the corresponding lowest economic cost are obtained. This paper are of great theoretical and practical significance for the initial quota allocation in carbon trading market and ensuring the achievement of carbon peaking target under economic effect.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Statistical Yearbook Of China, China Energy Statistical Yearbook and the China Financial Statistical Yearbook.
References
Akay D, Atak M (2007) Grey prediction with rolling mechanism for electricity demand forecasting of Turkey. Energy 32:1670–1675
Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Vidal F (2016) The directional distance function and the translation invariance property. Omega 58:1–3
Cao Q, Kang W, Sajid MJ, Cao M (2021) Research on the optimization of carbon abatement efficiency in China on the basis of task allocation. J Clean Prod 299
Chang WY, Wang SP, Song XY, Zhong FL (2022): Economic effects of command-and-control abatement policies under China's 2030 carbon emission goal. Journal of Environmental Management 312
Chen J, Wang P, Cui L, Huang S, Song M (2018) Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Appl Energy 231:937–950
Chi Y, Guo Z, Zheng Y, Zhang X (2014) Scenarios analysis of the energies’ consumption and carbon emissions in China based on a dynamic CGE Model. Sustainability 6:487–512
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. journal of Environmental Management 51, 229–240
CPETRI (2020) Energy outlook of the world and China in 2050
Cui L, Li R, Song M, Zhu L (2019) Can China achieve its 2030 energy development targets by fulfilling carbon intensity reduction commitments? Energy Economics 83:61–73
Cui Q, Liu Y, Ali T, Gao J, Chen H (2020) Economic and climate impacts of reducing China’s renewable electricity curtailment: A comparison between CGE models with alternative nesting structures of electricity. Energy Economics 91:104892
Cui X, Zhao T, Wang J (2021) Allocation of carbon emission quotas in China’s provincial power sector based on entropy method and ZSG-DEA. J Clean Prod 284
Dai H, Xie X, Xie Y, Liu J, Masui T (2016) Green growth: The economic impacts of large-scale renewable energy development in China. Appl Energy 162:435–449
Datta S (2019) Decoupling and demand-side management: Evidence from the US electric industry. Energy Policy 132:175–184
Dong B, Xu Y, Fan X (2020) How to achieve a win-win situation between economic growth and carbon emission reduction: empirical evidence from the perspective of industrial structure upgrading. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:43829–43844
DRCSC (2021) Analysis on the trend of labor supply and demand in China in the next decade, Economic Daily, pp. (in Chinese)
Du L, Mao J (2015) Estimating the environmental efficiency and marginal CO2 abatement cost of coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Policy 85:347–356
Du L, Hanley A, Wei C (2015a) Marginal abatement costs of carbon dioxide emissions in China: a parametric analysis. Environ Resource Econ 61:191–216
Du L, Hanley A, Wei C (2015b) Estimating the marginal abatement cost curve of CO2 emissions in China: provincial panel data analysis. Energy Economics 48:217–229
Duan N, Guo J-P, Xie B-C (2016) Is there a difference between the energy and CO2 emission performance for China’s thermal power industry? A bootstrapped directional distance function approach. Appl Energy 162:1552–1563
Duan H, Mo J, Fan Y, Wang S (2018) Achieving China’s energy and climate policy targets in 2030 under multiple uncertainties. Energy Economics 70:45–60
GEIDCO (2021) Report on China's Carbon neutrality by 2060
Hailu A, Veeman TS (2000) Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959–1994: An Input Distance Function Approach. J Environ Econ Manag 40:251–274
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Jiang MH, An HZ, Gao XY (2022) Adjusting the global industrial structure for minimizing global carbon emissions: A network-based multi-objective optimization approach. Science of the Total Environment 829
Kaneko S, Fujii H, Sawazu N, Fujikura R (2010) Financial allocation strategy for the regional pollution abatement cost of reducing sulfur dioxide emissions in the thermal power sector in China. Energy Policy 38:2131–2141
Khan I, Han L, Khan H (2022) Renewable energy consumption and local environmental effects for economic growth and carbon emission: evidence from global income countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:13071–13088
Leleu H (2013) Shadow pricing of undesirable outputs in nonparametric analysis. Eur J Oper Res 231:474–480
Li HZ, Li BK, Liu HY, Zhao HR, Wang YW (2021) Spatial distribution and convergence of provincial carbon intensity in China and its influencing factors: a spatial panel analysis from 2000 to 2017. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:54575–54593
Liu Y, Feng C (2021) What drives the decoupling between economic growth and energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s agricultural sector? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:44165–44182
Liu Y, Lu Y (2015) The economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis. Appl Energy 141:96–105
Ma C-Q, Ren Y-S, Zhang Y-J, Sharp B (2018) The allocation of carbon emission quotas to five major power generation corporations in China. J Clean Prod 189:1–12
Meng F (2019) Carbon emissions efficiency and abatement cost under inter-region differentiated mitigation strategies: A modified DDF model. Physica A 532:121888
Mi Z, Wei Y-M, Wang B, Meng J, Liu Z, Shan Y, Liu J, Guan D (2017) Socioeconomic impact assessment of China’s CO2 emissions peak prior to 2030. J Clean Prod 142:2227–2236
Nakaishi T (2021) Developing effective CO2 and SO2 mitigation strategy based on marginal abatement costs of coal-fired power plants in China. Appl Energy 294:116978
NCNA (2020) Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on the Complete, Accurate and Comprehensive Implementation of the New Development Concept to Do a Good Job in Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality, pp. (in Chinese)
Qin Q, Liu Y, Li X, Li H (2017) A multi-criteria decision analysis model for carbon emission quota allocation in China’s east coastal areas: efficiency and equity. J Clean Prod 168:410–419
Raza MY, Lin B (2020) Decoupling and mitigation potential analysis of CO2 emissions from Pakistan’s transport sector. Sci Total Environ 730:139000
Sajid MJ (2020) Modelling best fit-curve between China’s production and consumption-based temporal carbon emissions and selective socio-economic driving factors, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, pp. 012061
SCIO (2020) China's Energy Development in the New Era, pp. (in Chinese)
Simões S, Cleto J, Fortes P, Seixas J, Huppes G (2008) Cost of energy and environmental policy in Portuguese CO2 abatement—scenario analysis to 2020. Energy Policy 36:3598–3611
Tang K, Yang L, Zhang J (2016) Estimating the regional total factor efficiency and pollutants’ marginal abatement costs in China: A parametric approach. Appl Energy 184:230–240
Wang H, Chen W (2019) Modeling of energy transformation pathways under current policies, NDCs and enhanced NDCs to achieve 2-degree target. Appl Energy 250:549–557
Wang K, Wei Y-M (2014) China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Appl Energy 130:617–631
Wang Q, Hang Y, Zhou P, Wang Y (2016) Decoupling and attribution analysis of industrial carbon emissions in Taiwan. Energy 113:728–738
Wang Z-X, Li Q, Pei L-L (2018) A seasonal GM(1,1) model for forecasting the electricity consumption of the primary economic sectors. Energy 154:522–534
Wang Q, Jiang R, Zhan L (2019) Is decoupling economic growth from fuel consumption possible in developing countries?–A comparison of China and India. J Clean Prod 229:806–817
Wang Q, Zhang FY (2021) The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth e Evidence from 182 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 279
Wei X, Zhang N (2020) The shadow prices of CO2 and SO2 for Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants: A partial frontier approach. Energy Economics 85:104576
Wu L, Chen Y, Feylizadeh MR (2019) Study on the estimation, decomposition and application of China’s provincial carbon marginal abatement costs. J Clean Prod 207:1007–1022
Xie H, Shen M, Wei C (2016) Technical efficiency, shadow price and substitutability of Chinese industrial SO2 emissions: a parametric approach. J Clean Prod 112:1386–1394
Yang L, Yang Y, Zhang X, Tang K (2018) Whether China’s industrial sectors make efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from production?-A decomposed decoupling analysis. Energy 160:796–809
Yuan Y, Duan H, Tsvetanov TG (2020) Synergizing China’s energy and carbon mitigation goals: General equilibrium modeling and policy assessment. Energy Economics 89:104787
Zhang J, Wu G, Zhang J (2004) The Estimation of China’s provincial capital stock: 1952–2000. Econ Res J 10:35–44 ((in Chinese))
Zhang HN, Zhang XP, Yuan JH (2021a) Driving forces of carbon emissions in China: a provincial analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:21455–21470
Zhang Z, Chen Y, Wang C (2021b) Can CO2 emission reduction and economic growth be compatible? Evidence from China Front Energy Res 9:315
Zhao B, Sun L, Qin L (2022) Optimization of China’s provincial carbon emission transfer structure under the dual constraints of economic development and emission reduction goals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–17
Zhou X, Fan L, Zhou P (2015) Marginal CO2 abatement costs: Findings from alternative shadow price estimates for Shanghai industrial sectors. Energy Policy 77:109–117
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit section.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Wei Li contributed to the conceptualization, supervision and investigation.
Hongqing Ma was involved in the data curation, methodology and software.
Can Lu helped in writing—original draft preparation, writing—reviewing and editing and validation.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• A parametric non-radial directional distance function is adopted considering the resource input dimension.
• The future carbon emission efficiency and marginal abatement cost are estimated.
• The allocation scheme of carbon emission reduction tasks required for carbon peak target is optimized.
• From the perspective of the lowest economic cost, the path of realizing the total carbon peak scientifically and orderly in 30 provinces of China is obtained.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11356_2022_22641_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file3 Appendix C. Table C1. MACs (Yuan/ton CO2-e) and carbon emission efficiency (Eb) results for 2020-2030 (XLSX 21 KB)
11356_2022_22641_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file4 Appendix D. Table D.1. Results of carbon emission reduction task allocation (CR-thousand tons CO2-e) and efficiency improvement (Ei) and final carbon emission quota (CQ-thousand tons CO2-e) for 2020-2030 (XLSX 28 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Ma, H. & Lu, C. Research on the economic abatement pathway of carbon peaking in China based on marginal abatement costs and abatement tasks allocation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 7956–7972 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22641-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22641-5