Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial layout planning of intensive pig farms in the suburb: a case study of Nanyu, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of livestock and poultry breeding were distributed in the suburbs, brought a strong environmental pressure to the cities. The issue of whether livestock and poultry breeding could be carried out in the suburbs was a key controversy in the present. To address this question, this study constructed an index system of suitability evaluation of spatial layout of intensive pig farms, calculated the average surface temperature from June to September, and obtained potential intensive pig farms in Nanyu Town. Combing above results and area index results of cultivated land spatial matched with intensive pig farm, spatial relation between cultivated land and potential intensive pig farm was built, the optimum potential intensive pig farm in Nanyu Town was determined, and its carrying capacity was calculated. Results showed that livestock and poultry breeding could be carried out in the suburbs. A total of 3403 and 3253 pieces of cultivated lands occupying 52.01% and 49.67% of the total cultivated lands had a spatial relation between potential intensive pig farms taking N and P as indices, respectively. Moreover, 14 and 15 potential intensive pig farms taking N and P as indices, respectively, in Nanyu Town were determined as optimum potential intensive pig farms. Results also indicated that most of the optimum potential intensive pig farms were suitable for constructing small- and medium-sized pig farms. Results would provide scientific basis for the planning of spatial arrangement of livestock and poultry breeding and the suburb environmental pollution control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alemayehu A, Legesse D, Peden D, Tadesse G (2008) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis for land suitability modeling of livestock production in Tana Sub-basin, Ethiopia. Fighting Poverty Through Sustainable Water Use: Proceedings of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food 2nd International Forum on Water and Food, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.10–14 November,106–109

  • Ameen RFM, Mourshed M (2019) Urban sustainability assessment framework development: the ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process. Sustain Cities Soc 44:356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arifin A, Kurniawan R (2018) Multiple attribute evaluation for site selection of donation sacrificed animals. J Comput Theor Nanosci 24(1):660–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Baser V, Yildirim V (2019) The problems and resolution approaches in the determination of site selection criteria of dairy/livestock. International Conference on Agriculture, Food, Veterinary and Pharmacy Sciences (ICAFOP- Trabzon 2019),Trabzon, Turkey

  • Calvet-Sanz S (2021) GIS-based and outranking approach to assess suitable pig farming areas in the mediterranean region: Valencian Community. Animals 11(4):1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY (2009) Planning, design and management of livestock farms. China Agriculture Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, van Velthuizen H (2006) Livestock production planning under environmental risks and uncertainties. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 15(4):399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flamant JC, Béranger C, Gibon A (1999) Animal production and land use sustainability: an approach from the farm diversity at territory level. Livest Prod Sci 61(2–3):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego A, Calafat C, Segura M, Quintanilla I (2019) Land planning and risk assessment for livestock production based on an outranking approach and GIS. Land Use Policy 83:606–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China (2008) Construction for intensive pig farms (GB/T 17824.1–2008)

  • Gerber PJ, Carsjens GJ, Pak-uthai T, Robinson TP (2008) Decision support for spatially targeted livestock policies: diverse examples from Uganda and Thailand. Agric Syst 96(1–3):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huda M, Okajima K, Suzuki K (2017) Identifying public and experts perspectives towards large-scale solar PV system using analytic hierarchy process. Energy Procedia 142:2554–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain DK, Tim US, Jolly RW (1995) A spatial decision support system for livestock production planning and environmental management. Appl Eng Agric 11:711–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleda S, Murayama Y (2013) Geographic concentration and development potential of poultry microenterprises and value chain: a study based on suitable sites in Gazipur. Bangladesh Social Sciences 2(3):147–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li WS, Peng HS, Song LSY, Wu GY (2016) Study on pollution control model of large and medium pig farms. China Swine Industry 11(11):24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JG, Akdeniz N, Kim HHM, Gates RS, Wang XL, Wang KY (2021) Optimal manure utilization chain for distributed animal farms: model development and a case study from Hangzhou. China Agricultural Systems 187:102996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZH, Nian FH, Shi ZH (2018) Suitability evaluation of spatial distribution of livestock and poultry breeding industry in Suzhou. Journal of Suzhou University of Science and Technology (natural Science Edition) 35(2):55–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng XH, Zhou HC, Zhang JB (2015) Spatial and temporal characteristics and EKC verifification for livestock pollution. J Arid Land Resour Environ 29(11):104–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China (2003) Technical code for overall plane design of livestock farms (NY/T 682–2003)

  • Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China (2007) Construction criterion for standardized intensive pig farm (NY/T 1568–2007)

  • Morales A, Valle JA, Castillo G, Antoine D, Avelar E, Camacho RL, Buenabad L, Cervantes M (2019) The dietary protein content slightly affects the body temperature of growing pigs exposed to heat stress. Translational Animal Science 3(4):1326–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira ACDFD, Vanelli K, Sotomaior CS, Weber SH, Costa LB (2019) Impacts on performance of growing-finishing pigs under heat stress conditions: a meta-analysis. Veterinary research communications.Veterinary Research Communications volume, 43:37–43

  • Oviedo-pastrana ME, Moura ACM, Socarrás TJO, Haddad JPA (2014) Map of the development of dairy husbandry in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: new approach to livestock for the spatial integration of production variables. Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinária E Zootecnia 66(4):1147–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel SP, Upadhyay SH (2020) Euclidean distance based feature ranking and subset selection for bearing fault diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications 154:113400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng L, Chen W, Li M, Bai Y, Pan Y (2014) GIS-based study of the spatial distribution suitability of livestock and poultry farming: the case of Putian, Fujian, China. Comput Electron Agric 108:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perondi D, Kipper M, Andretta I, Hauschild L, Lunedo R, Franceschina CS, Remus A (2018) Empirical models to predict feed intake of growing-finishing pigs reared under high environmental temperatures. Scientia Agricola 75(4):296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Song KH, Hu T, Ying TY (2018) Environmental status of livestock and poultry sectors in china under current transformation stage. Sci Total Environ 622–623:702–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Zhu J, Pan Y, Hu W, Amable GS (2017) Multi-criteria land use suitability analysis for livestock development planning in Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. J Clean Prod 161:1011–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo I, Umanu BO (2020) Site selection for a poultry farm in a mixed class academic community. Int J Trend Res Dev 4(1):203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • State Environmental Protection Administration of China (2001) Technical standard of preventing pollution for livestock and poultry breeding (HJ/T81–2001)

  • Wang YG, Wang X, Li MW, Wu JL, Zhang N, Xu F (2017) Status quo of and problems in delimiting of livestock/poultry breeding forbidden zones in China. J Ecol Rural Environ 33(7):615–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Weersink A, Eveland C (2006) The siting of livestock facilities and environmental regulations. Can J Agric Econ 54(1):159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei S, Bai ZH, Chadwick D, Hou Y, Qin W, Zhao ZQ, Jiang RF, Ma L (2018) Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and mitigation options from livestock production in peri-urban agriculture: Beijing-a case study. J Clean Prod 178:515–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Diao H, Feng J, Zhang M, Diao X (2016) Regularities of thermoregulation in finishing swine affected by thermal-humidity environment. Chin J Animal Nutri 28(11):3386–3390

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ (2018) Study on spatial layout planning of livestock farms. China Meteorological Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ, Pan YC, Zhao CJ, Guo X, Yin HM (2010) Suitability evaluation of livestock farm spatial layout in county-level. Geogr Res 29(7):1214–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ, Wang BJ, Li YX (2016) Suitability evaluation of spatial layout of industrial livestock and poultry farms based on GIS. Environ Pollut Prev 38(5):67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ, Shi WJ, Yan JJ, Chun KP (2017) Spatial distribution of livestock and poultry farm based on livestock manure nitrogen load on farmland and suitability evaluation. Comput Electron Agric 139:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Z, Wang C, Xu J, Huo X, Hussain Q (2019) Examining the effect of absorptive capacity on waste processing method adoption: a case study on Chinese pig farms. J Clean Prod 215:978–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ, Yan JJ, Shi WJ, Li YX (2020) Study on the comprehensive comparative advantages of pig production and development in China based on geographic information system. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22(1):105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan BJ, Li YX, Yan JJ, Shi WJ (2021) Spatial site selection for a centralized treatment center of livestock excreta: taking Nantong Town as an example. Comp Electron Agri 180:105885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin S, Zhang XX, Liu CJ, Zhang D, Zou GB, Dai GS, Zhou P (2019) Based on China-dndc model and optimal environmental benefits pig equivalent and planting farmland matching algorithm and application. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (agricultural Science) 37(1):12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CZ (2019) Livestock management on the basis of cropland distribution. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CZ, Liu S, Wu SX, Jin SQ, Reis SF, Liu HB, Gu BJ (2019) Rebuilding the linkage between livestock and cropland to mitigate agricultural pollution in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Carsjens GJ, Gerber P (2006) Regional planning of pig husbandry with environmental protection using GIS. Trans Chin Soc Agri Eng 22(9):184–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Liu Y, Bluemling B, Chen J, Mol APJ (2013) Modeling the environmental behavior and performance of livestock farmers in China: An ABM approach. Agric Syst 122:60–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JC, Zhang ZQ, Fan ZM, Li RH (2014) Biogas potential, cropland load and total amount control of animal manure in China. J Agro-Environ Sci 33(3):435–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research had been partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 41601601, 61501249, and 61971236; the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province under Grant No. 2020J01830; and the Science and Technology project of Minjiang University under Grant No. MYK21013.

national natural science foundation of china,41601601,Bojie YAN,61501249,Jingjie YAN,61971236,Jingjie YAN,natural science foundation of fujian province,2020J01830,Bojie YAN,the Science and Technology project of Minjiang University,MYK21013,Bojie YAN

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Yaxing Li, Yanfang Qin, and Jingjie Yan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Bojie Yan, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaxing Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, B., Li, Y., Qin, Y. et al. Spatial layout planning of intensive pig farms in the suburb: a case study of Nanyu, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 44819–44831 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19077-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19077-2

Keywords

Navigation