Abstract
The prediction accuracy of the spatial distribution of soil pollutants at a site is relatively low. Related pollutants can be used as auxiliary variables to improve the prediction accuracy. However, little relevant research has been conducted on site soil pollution. To analyze the prediction accuracy of target pollutants combined with auxiliary pollutants, Cu, toluene, and phenanthrene were selected as the target pollutants for this study. Based on geostatistical analysis and spatial analysis, the following results were obtained. (1) The reduction in the root mean square errors (RMSEs) for Cu, toluene, and phenanthrene with multivariable cokriging was 68.4%, 81.6%, and 81.2%, respectively, which are proportional to the correlation coefficient of the relationship between the auxiliary pollutants and the target pollutants. (2) The RMSEs calculated for the multivariable cokriging were lower than those obtained by only combining one related pollutants, and two co-variables should be better. (3) The predicted results for Cu, phenanthrene, and toluene and their corresponding related pollutants are more accurate than the results obtained not using the related pollutants. (4) In the interpolation process, the RMSEs for Cu, toluene, and phenanthrene with multivariable cokriging basically increase as the neighborhood sample data increases, and then they become stable. (5) When 84, 61, and 34 sample points were removed, the RMSEs for Cu, toluene, and phenanthrene, respectively, with multivariable cokriging were close to the RMSEs of the target pollutants based on the total samples. The results are of great significance to improving the prediction accuracy of the spatial distribution of soil pollutants at coking plant sites.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Armiento G, Cremisini C, Nardi E, Pacifico R (2011) High geochemical background of potentially harmful elements in soils and sediments: implications for the remediation of contaminated sites. Chem Ecol 27:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2010.534085
Carlon C, Critto A, Marcomini A, Nathanail P (2001) Risk based characterisation of contaminated industrial site using multivariate and geostatistical tools. Environ Pollut 111:417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00089-0
Chen XB, Liu WX, Zhou YX, Qiao XY, Zhao JB, Li HF et al (2016) Analysis of HCHs and DDTs in a typical prestide contaminated site. Fresenius Environ Bull 25:5145–5150
Cui JL, Luo CL, Tang CWY, Chan TS, Li XD (2017) Speciation and leaching of trace metal contaminants from e-waste contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 329:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.060
DB11/T 811 (2011) Screening levels for soil environmental risk assessment of sites
Ding Q, Cheng G, Wang Y, Zhuang DF (2017) Effects of natural factors on the spatial distribution of heavy metals in soils surrounding mining regions. Sci Total Environ 578:577–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.001
Dong JH, Yu M, Bian ZF, Wang Y, Di CL (2011) Geostatistical analyses of heavy metal distribution in reclaimed mine land in Xuzhou, China. Environ Earth Sci 62:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0507-5
Fang YY, Nie ZQ, Die QQ, Tian YJ, Liu F, He J et al (2017) Organochlorine pesticides in soil, air, and vegetation at and around a contaminated site in southwestern China: Concentration, transmission, and risk evaluation. Chemosphere 178:340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.151
Fu CC, Zhang HB, Tu C, Li LZ, Luo YM (2018) Geostatistical interpolation of available copper in orchard soil as influenced by planting duration. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7882-8
Gao L, Shao MG (2012) The interpolation accuracy for seven soil properties at various sampling scales on the Loess Plateau, China. J Soils Sediments 12:128–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0438-0
Girault F, Perrier F, Poitou C, Isambert A, Theveniaut H, Laperche V et al (2016) Effective radium concentration in topsoils contaminated by lead and zinc smelters. Sci Total Environ 566:865–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.007
Goovaerts P, Trinh HT, Demond AH, Towey T, Chang SC, Gwinn D et al (2008) Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxin in the vicinity of an incinerator. 2. Verification and calibration study. Environ Sci Technol 42:3655–3661. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7024966
Gou YL, Yang SC, Cheng YJ, Song Y, Qiao PW, Li PZ et al (2019) Enhanced anoxic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in aged soil pretreated by hydrogen peroxide. Chem Eng J 356:524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.059
Gutierrez M, Wu SS, Peebles JL (2015) Geochemical mapping of Pb- and Zn-contaminated streambed sediments in southwest Missouri, USA. J Soils Sediments 15:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1010-5
Hofmann T, Darsow A, Schafmeister MT (2010) Importance of the nugget effect in variography on modeling zinc leaching from a contaminated site using simulated annealing. J Hydrol 389:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.024
Huo XN, Li H, Sun DF, Zhou LD, Li BG (2010) Multi-scale spatial structure of heavy metals in agricultural soils in Beijing. Environ Monit Assess 164:605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0916-7
Juang KW, Lee DY (1998) A comparison of three kriging methods using auxiliary variables in heavy-metal contaminated soils. J Environ Qual 27:355–363
Juang KW, Lee DY, Chen ZS (1996) Prediction of spatial distribution of heavy metal in contaminated soils by geostatistics: I. Effect of extreme values and semivariogram models. J Chin Chem Soc 34:560–574
Juang KW, Lee DY, Ellsworth TR (2001) Using rank-order geostatistics for spatial interpolation of highly skewed data in a heavy-metal contaminated site. J Environ Qual 30:894–903. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.303894x
Khosravi Y, Balyani S (2019) Spatial modeling of mean annual temperature in Iran: comparing cokriging and geographically weighted regression. Environ Model Assess 24:341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9623-5
Le C, Le T, Jeong HD, Lee EB (2019) Geographic information system–based framework for estimating and visualizing unit prices of highway work items. J Constr Eng Manag 145:04019044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001672
Li J, Heap AD (2014) Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: a review. Environ Model Softw 53:173–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008
Li X, Jiao W, Xiao R, Chen W, Liu W (2017) Contaminated sites in China: countermeasures of provincial governments. J Clean Prod 147:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.107
Li XW, Xie YF, Wang JF, Christakos G, Si JL, Zhao HN et al (2013a) Influence of planting patterns on fluoroquinolone residues in the soil of an intensive vegetable cultivation area in northern China. Sci Total Environ 458–460:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.002
Li XY, Liu LJ, Wang YG, Luo GP, Chen X, Yang XL et al (2013b) Heavy metal contamination of urban soil in an old industrial city (Shenyang) in Northeast China. Geoderma 192:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.011
Liu G, Bi R, Wang S, Li F, Guo G (2013) The use of spatial autocorrelation analysis to identify PAHs pollution hotspots at an industrially contaminated site. Environ Monit Assess 185:9549–9558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3272-6
Liu G, Niu JJ, Guo WJ, Zhao L, Zhang C, Wang M et al (2017) Assessment of terrain factors on the pattern and extent of soil contamination surrounding a chemical industry in Chongqing, Southwest China. CATENA 156:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.005
Liu G, Niu JJ, Zhang C, Guo GL (2015) Accuracy and uncertainty analysis of soil Bbf spatial distribution estimation at a coking plant-contaminated site based on normalization geostatistical technologies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:20121–20130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5122-2
Lu AX, Wang JH, Qin XY, Wang KY, Han P, Zhang SZ (2012) Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and origin of heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunyi, Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 425:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.003
Ma ZW, Chen K, Li ZY, Bi J, Huang L (2016) Heavy metals in soils and road dusts in the mining areas of Western Suzhou, China: a preliminary identification of contaminated sites. J Soils Sediments 16:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1208-1
Modis K, Papantonopoulos G, Komnitsas K, Papaodysseus K (2008) Mapping optimization based on sampling size in earth related and environmental phenomena. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 22:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0096-8
Monaco D, Riccio A, Chianese E, Adamo P, Di Rosa S, Fagnano M (2015) Chemical characterization and spatial distribution of PAHs and heavy hydrocarbons in rural sites of Campania Region, South Italy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:14993–15003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4733-y
Paulette L, Man T, Weindorf DC, Person T (2015) Rapid assessment of soil and contaminant variability via portable x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: Copşa Mică, Romania. Geoderma 243–244:130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.025
Qiao PW, Lei M, Yang SC, Yang J, Guo GH, Zhou XY (2018) Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15597–15608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1552-y
Qiao PW, Li PZ, Cheng YJ, Wei WX, Yang SC, Lei M et al (2019) Comparison of common spatial interpolation methods for analyzing pollutant spatial distributions at contaminated sites. Environ Geochem Health 41:2709–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00328-0
Rashed MN (2010) Monitoring of contaminated toxic and heavy metals, from mine tailings through age accumulation, in soil and some wild plants at Southeast Egypt. J Hazard Mater 178:739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.147
Ren LX, Lu HW, He L, Zhang YM (2016) Characterization of monochlorobenzene contamination in soils using geostatistical interpolation and 3D visualization for agrochemical industrial sites in southeast China. Arch Environ Protect 42:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/aep-2016-0025
Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2006) Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agric 50:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.07.003
Roslund MI, Gronroos M, Rantalainen AL, Jumpponen A, Romantschuk M, Parajuli A et al (2018) Half-lives of PAHs and temporal microbiota changes in commonly used urban landscaping materials. PeerJ 6:e4508. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4508
Saito H, Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical interpolation of positively skewed and censored data in a dioxin-contaminated site. Environ Sci Technol 34:4228–4235. https://doi.org/10.1021/es991450y
Saito H, Goovaerts P (2002) Accounting for measurement error in uncertainty modeling and decision-making using indicator kriging and p-field simulation: application to a dioxin contaminated site. Environmetrics 13:555–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.545
Santos-Francés F, Martinez-Graña A, Alonso Rojo P, García Sánchez A (2017) Geochemical background and baseline values determination and spatial distribution of heavy metal pollution in soils of the Andes mountain range (Cajamarca-Huancavelica, Peru). Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080859
Schnabel U, Tietje O (2003) Explorative data analysis of heavy metal contaminated soil using multidimensional spatial regression. Environ Geol 44:893–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0844-8
Shi R, Xu M, Liu A, Tian Y, Zhao Z (2017) Characteristics of PAHs in farmland soil and rainfall runoff in Tianjin, China. Environ Monit Assess 189:558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6290-y
Tziachris P, Metaxa E, Papadopoulos F, Papadopoulou M (2017) Spatial modelling and prediction assessment of soil iron using kriging interpolation with pH as auxiliary information. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6:283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6090283
USEPA (2014) Method 6020B: inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry
USEPA (2018) Method 8270E: Semivolatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)
USEPA ( 2017) Method 8260D (SW-846): Volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS)
Vyas VM, Tong SN, Uchrin C, Georgopoulos PG, Carter GR (2004) Geostatistical estimation of horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01018.x
Weindorf DC, Paulette L, Man T (2013) In-situ assessment of metal contamination via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: Zlatna, Romania. Environ Pollut 182:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.07.008
Wu C, Wu J, Luo Y, Zhang H, Teng Y, DeGloria SD (2011a) Spatial interpolation of severely skewed data with several peak values by the approach integrating kriging and triangular irregular network interpolation. Environmental Earth Sciences 63:1093–1103
Wu CF, Wu JP, Luo YM, Zhang HB, Teng Y (2008) Statistical and geoestatistical characterization of heavy metal concentrations in a contaminated area taking into account soil map units. Geoderma 144:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.11.001
Wu GZ, Kechavarzi C, Li XG, Wu SM, Pollard SJT, Sui H et al (2013) Machine learning models for predicting PAHs bioavailability in compost amended soils. Chem Eng J 223:747–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.122
Wu J, Norvell WA, Welch RM (2006) Kriging on highly skewed data for DTPA-extractable soil Zn with auxiliary information for pH and organic carbon. Geoderma 134:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.11.002
Xie YF, Chen TB, Lei M, Yang J, Guo QJ, Song B et al (2011) Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere 82:468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.053
Yang QY, Luo WQ, Jiang ZC, Li WJ, Yuan DX (2016) Improve the prediction of soil bulk density by cokriging with predicted soil water content as auxiliary variable. J Soils Sediments 16:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1193-4
Yang, SC, Gou, YL, Song, Y, Li, PZ (2018) Enhanced anoxic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a highly contaminated aged soil using nitrate and soil microbes. Environmental Earth Sciences 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7629-6
Zhang B, Yang Y (2017) Spatiotemporal modeling and prediction of soil heavy metals based on spatiotemporal cokriging. Sci Rep 7:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17018-5
Zhen JC, Pei T, Xie SY (2019) Kriging methods with auxiliary nighttime lights data to detect potentially toxic metals concentrations in soil. Sci Total Environ 659:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.330
Zhou J, Feng K, Li Y, Zhou Y (2016) Factorial Kriging analysis and sources of heavy metals in soils of different land-use types in the Yangtze River Delta of Eastern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:14957–14967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6619-z
Funding
This work was supported by the Sprout project of Beijing Academy of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
QPW was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. LDL is responsible for the preliminary data collation. YSC controlled the content of the whole article. ZQY and WHQ collected and analyzed the samples. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiao, P., Lai, D., Yang, S. et al. Effectiveness of predicting the spatial distributions of target contaminants of a coking plant based on their related pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 33945–33956 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17951-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17951-z