Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental impact assessment and enlightenment of surface treatment production line during operation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial production creates material conditions for mankind, but also seriously pollutes the environment. In order to avoid pollution damage to the atmosphere, water, sound, and other environments, environmental impact assessments must be carried out before the project starts, and possible environmental pollution factors must be analyzed and predicted in advance. Company A, a manufacturer of mechanical parts, plans to build a new surface treatment production line, including two production links: anodizing and painting. The product coefficient method and the material balance method were used to evaluate and analyze the environmental pollution factors such as waste gas, wastewater, noise, solid waste, and discarded bath solution discharged during the operation period of the production line. The evaluation results show that after chromium mist recovery, spraying, filtration, and activated carbon adsorption and other measures are concentrated treatment, the concentration of various exhaust gas discharged in an organized manner is lower than the standard limit; various wastewater can be recycled after being filtered by ion exchange resin and activated carbon use, a very small amount of concentrated liquid needs to be handled by an external professional unit, and a cofferdam is installed under the production line and the ground is strengthened to prevent leakage, which will not pollute the groundwater environment; the noise level on the four plant boundaries during the operation of the production line meets the noise standard. No noise pollution will be generated; solid waste and discarded bath solutions are centrally stored by the enterprise and entrusted to an external professional unit for processing, and no other pollution will be generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

References

  • Chang J (2009) The theory and practice of China’s environmental law for 30 years. J China Univ Geosci Soc Sci 9:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu J, Yan Y, Zhao C (2007) The formulation of cleaner production plan in the environmental impact assessment of a paper-making enterprise’s expansion. Proj Environl Sci Manag 32:188–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao G (2003) The Americans’ controversy over the use of pesticides in the 1960s and its influences. World History:12–23

  • Hu S, Zhang J (2000) Development and prospection of international cooperation on ozone layer protection. Environ Prot 9:45–48. https://doi.org/10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2000.09.017

  • Li X (2013) Canadian environmental impact assessment procedure and its enlightenment to our country. Comparative:138–144

  • Lin Z (2011) South Korea’s marine environmental impact assessment system and its inspiration. Hebei Law 29:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Zhou J (2016) Public service policies of haze-prevention in the United States and the policy implications. Resour Dev Mark 32:1073–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Wang Z (2017) The non-regulatory adjustment method in Japanese environmental law and its enlightenment to my country. J Hehai Univ Philos Soc Sci 19:55–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Dong X, Liu Y, Pan J, Liu L, Shi P (2013) Environmental impact assessment of county land use planning. Arid Land Resources and Environment 27:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang L, Bao C, Ding Z (2011) The current situation of urban comprehensive traffic and the response of the city’s general plan. Environ Assess Urban Dev Res 18:115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng B, Yang Z, Chen W (2000) A survey of the development of environmental assessment systems in ASEAN countries. Environ Prot:45–48

  • Shen X, Wang Z, Zhan G, Niu Z, Xu S, Zhang L, Qi X (2014) Key points for environmental impact assessment of electroplating construction projects. Electroplat Finishing 33:849–852

  • Tong X, Li Z (2004) On the establishment and operability of the legal system of environmental impact assessment in our country. China Environ Manage:9–11

  • Wang S (2009) The environmental impact assessment of the metal surface coating project. Sci Info Dev Econ 19:164–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen Y (2016) Thoughts and index system of strategic environmental assessment for controlling greenhouse gas emissions. China's Popul Resour Environ 26:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Pan F, Tong J, Wang Y (2010) Main points of environmental impact assessment for central heating projects. Environ Prot:47–49

  • Wu D, Li X (2015) The selection of non-methane total hydrocarbons and VOCs in the environmental impact assessment of automobile surface coating projects. Jiangxi Chemical Industry 5:61–63. https://doi.org/10.14127/j.cnki.jiangxihuagong.2015.05.019

  • Xi O, Zeng Y, Shen Y, Dong B (2015) Prediction method of motor vehicle exhaust impact in transportation planning and environmental assessment. China's Popul Resour Environ 25:171–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (1998) The greenhouse effect and its impact on the ecological environment. Urban Environ Urban Ecol 11:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Kang L, Yao X, Zeng H (2014) Environmental impact assessment of noise during highway operation - take a road in Tianjin as an example. China's Popul Resour Environ 24:162–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X (2016) From gloomy to sunny, the process of eliminating the haze of the “foggy city”. London. Urban Plan Int 31:68–73. https://doi.org/10.22217/upi.2015.298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Jiang Q (2010) An overview and review of the 40 years of U.S. environmental impact assessment system. Contemp Law 24:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Yang F (2016) Swedish land and environment court system and its implications for China. Environ Prot 7:66–69. https://doi.org/10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2016.07.015

  • Zhou J, Gao D, Chang L (2011) Application of ecosystem service function evaluation in environmental impact assessment of general land use planning - take Daqing city, Heilongjiang province as an example. Econ Geogr 31:1014–1018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation: L.K. Writing—data collection and analysis, L.K. and J.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Kong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, L., Li, J. Environmental impact assessment and enlightenment of surface treatment production line during operation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 57207–57215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14664-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14664-1

Keywords

Navigation