Skip to main content
Log in

Horticultural products irrigated with treated sewage: are they acceptable?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public acceptance of treated sewage (TS) reuse in agriculture is a key element in successful implementation of TS reuse projects, but relevant research on the topic is limited. This study examined public willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) for agricultural products derived by irrigation with TS in Lorestan province, Iran, applying the contingent valuation (CV) method. The agricultural products determined for the study included corn, peaches, apricots, and plums, while TS was introduced in three qualities [Q1, complete TS treatment (i.e., physical treatment, aeration, and chemical treatment); Q2, partial TS treatment (i.e., physical treatment and aeration); and Q3, no TS treatment]. With reference to WTA, products irrigated with Q1 TS received 62.7% positive responses, while products irrigated with Q2 TS and Q3 TS received 21.3% and 17.0% positive responses, respectively. With reference to WTP, data showed that if the price of products derived by irrigation with TS was less than that of products irrigated with fresh water, some people would be willing to pay for these products (52.0% positive responses versus 48.0% negative responses). Awareness had a significantly positive impact on WTA1 and WTA2 (products irrigated with Q1 TS and Q2 TS, respectively) as well as on WTP1, WTP2, and WTP3 (products irrigated with Q1 TS, Q2 TS, and Q3 TS, respectively). Similarly, information sources had a significantly positive effect on WTP1, WTP2, and WTP3. Overall, individuals with high levels of health risk perception and high awareness showed high WTA, while non-processed corn and men were associated with low WTA. Concerning WTP, individuals with high awareness and those who had access to information sources showed high WTP, while men were associated with low WTP. Information about the importance of TS reuse, reduction of prices of products derived by irrigation with TS, and promotion of public confidence in TS are essential to increase public WTA and WTP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbasi H, Merianji Z, Omidinejad AR (2016) Different geographical-spatial in Khoramabad’s districts. J Environ Territ Plann 9:1–196 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelrahman RM, Khamis SE, Rizk ZE (2020) Public attitude toward expanding the reuse of treated wastewater in the United Arab Emirates. Environ Dev Sustain 22:7887–7908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbari N, Shajari H, Bidram R (2017) Assessing vehicle users’ willingness to pay for price of gasoline (application of CVM). Econ Res 79:39–58 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arafat W (2013) The role of public awareness towards sustainable use of treated wastewater in agricultural irrigation. MSc Thesis, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine

  • Baghapour MA, Shooshtarian MR, Djahed B (2017) A survey of attitudes and acceptance of wastewater reuse in Iran: Shiraz city as a case study. J Water Reuse Desalin 7:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghestani M, Zibaei M (2010) Measuring willingness of farmers to pay for groundwater in Ramjerd District: application of contingent valuation method. Agric Econ 4:1–250 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakopoulou S, Polyzos S, Kungolos A (2010) Investigation of farmers’ willingness to pay for using recycled water for irrigation in Thessaly region, Greece. Desalination 2501:329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbagallo S, Cirelli G, Indelicato S (2001) Wastewater reuse in Italy. Water Sci Technol 43:43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Castro C, Lopes A, Vaz I, Silva E, Manaia C, Nunes O (2015) Wastewater reuse in irrigation: a microbiological perspective on implications in soil fertility and human and environmental health. Environ Int 75:117–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal UJ, Mara DD, Ayres RM, Cifuentes E, Peasey A, Stott R, Lee DL, Ruiz-Palacios G (1996) Evaluation of the WHO nematode egg guidelines for restricted and unrestricted irrigation. Water Sci Technol 22:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamanpira R, Zand M, Veis-Karami A (2018) Analyzing the pattern of monitoring, evaluation and management of drought in Lorestan province. 3rd National Conference on Soil Conservation and Watershed Management (in Persian)

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Compagni R, Gabrielli M, Polesel F, Turolla A, Trapp S, Vezzaro L, Antonelli M (2020) Risk assessment of contaminants of emerging concern in the context of wastewater reuse for irrigation: an integrated modelling approach. Chemosphere 242:125185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deviller G, Lundy L, Fatta-Kassinos D (2020) Recommendations to derive quality standards for chemical pollutants in reclaimed water intended for reuse in agricultural irrigation. Chemosphere 240:124911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont DP (2013) Water use restrictions or wastewater recycling? A Canadian willingness to pay study for reclaimed wastewater. Water Res Econ 1:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui NI, Scott CA, Raschid-Sally L (2004) Confronting the realities of wastewater use in irrigated agriculture: lessons learned and recommendations. In: Scott CA, Faruqui NI, Raschid-Sally L (eds) Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis I, Koukoulakis P, Vasquez M (2011) The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci Total Environ 409:3555–3563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedler E, Lahav O, Jizhaki H, Lahav T (2006) Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study. J Environ Manag 81:360–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Valero L, Moral-Pajares E, Román-Sánchez IM (2019) Crop production and irrigation: deciding factors of wastewater reuse in Spain? Desalin Water Treat 150:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gayarti A, Barbier E (2000) Valuing the groundwater recharge through agricultural production in the Hadejia-Nguru Westland in northern Nigeria. Agric Econ 22:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes ME, Suri MR, Rosenberg Goldstein RE (2020) Traditional approaches for educating farmers about nontraditional water: evaluating preferred outreach, education, and methods for alleviating concerns. J Environ Manag 275:111265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadimipour J, Dastgir M, Izadinia N (2016) Investigating the relationship between factors affecting auditors’ advocacy risk and audited adjustment opinions. Audit Know 16:77–96 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu Q, Chen Y, Pody R, Cheng R, Zheng X, Zhang Z (2015) Public perception and acceptability toward reclaimed water in Tianjin. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann A (2008) Community attitudes to recycled water use: an urban Australian case study – part 2. Research Report No. 56, Cooperative Research Centre for Water Quality and Treatment. Salisbury, South Australia

  • Hussaini ID, Aliyu B, Abubakar SI, Aminu M (2013) Assessment of health risks associated with wastewater irrigation in Yola Adamawa State, Nigeria. Int J Water Res Environ Eng 5:54–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Inyinbor AA, Bello OS, Oluyori AP, Inyinbor HE, Fadiji AE (2019) Wastewater conservation and reuse in quality vegetable cultivation: overview, challenges and future prospects. Food Control 98:489–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo MF, Restrepo I (2017) Wastewater reuse in agriculture: a review about its limitations and benefits. Sustainability 9:734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahlou F-Z, Mackey HR, Al-Ansari T (2021) Wastewater reuse for livestock feed irrigation as a sustainable practice: a socio-environmental-economic review. J Clean Prod 294:126331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald DH, Rose JM, Lease HJ, Cox DN (2016) Recycled wastewater and product choice: does it make a difference if and when you taste it? Food Qual Prefer 48:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahjoub O, Jemai A, Gharbi N, Arbi AM, Dekhil S (2018) Public acceptance of wastewater use in agriculture: Tunisian experience. In: Hettiarachchi H, Ardakanian R (eds) Safe use of wastewater in agriculture: from concept to implementation. Springer Publishing, New York, pp 131–157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud MA, Kazarian A, Alameddine I, Al-Hindi M (2018) Factors influencing the reuse of reclaimed water as a management option to augment water supplies. Environ Monit Assess 190:531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay J, Hurlimann AC (2003) Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: part 1 age. Water J Aust Water Assoc 30:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-Espinosa LG, Burgess JE, Daesslé L, Villada-Canela M (2019) Reclaimed water for the irrigation of vineyards: Mexico and South Africa as case studies. Sustain Cities Soc 51:101769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegaki AN, Hanley N, Tsagarakis KP (2007) The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: a study of consumers’ and farmers’ attitudes. Ecol Econ 621:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michetti M, Raggi M, Guerra E, Viaggi D (2019) Interpreting farmers’ perceptions of risks and benefits concerning waste water reuse for irrigation: a case study in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Water (Switzerland) 11:108

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzashahi K, Bazargan K, Baghori A (2015) Wastewater and its use in agriculture. Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Institute of Soil and Water Research, Technical Bulletin No. 534 (in Persian)

  • Mok H-F, Hamilton AJ (2014) Exposure factors for wastewater-irrigated Asian vegetables and a probabilistic rotavirus disease burden model for their consumption. Risk Anal 34:602–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu'azu ND, Abubakar IR, Blaisi NI (2020) Public acceptability of treated wastewater reuse in Saudi Arabia: implications for water management policy. Sci Total Environ 721:137659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oron G (2003) Agriculture, water and the environment: future challenges. Water Sci Technol 3:51–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pazira M, Bagheri HR (2007) Health risks from the reuse of wastewater in agriculture. Proceedings of 6th Conference of Agricultural Economics (in Persian)

  • Petousi I, Daskalakis G, Fountoulakis MS, Lydakis D, Fletcher L, Stentiford EI, Manios T (2019) Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on the establishment of young grapevines. Sci Total Environ 658:485–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir M, Wichelns D, Raschid-Sally L, McCornick PG, Drechsel P, Bahri A, Minhas PS (2010) The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agric Water Manag 97:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar C, Nautiyal S, Seshaiah M (2018) Social acceptance for reclaimed water use: a case study in Bengaluru. Recycling 3:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei-Banafsheh M, Kakolvand M (2015) Zoning Lorestan Province by using cluster analysis. J Phys Geogr 7:41–50 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice J, Wutich A, White DD, Westerhoff P (2016) Comparing actual de facto wastewater reuse and its public acceptability: a three city case study. Sustain Cities Soc 27:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson K, Robinson C, Hawkins S (2005) Assessment of public perception regarding wastewater reuse. Water Sci Technol 5:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliba R, Callieris R, D’Agostino D, Roma R, Scardigno A (2018) Stakeholders’ attitude towards the reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation in Mediterranean agriculture. Agric Water Manag 204:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena R, Frost S (1992) Sewage management in some Asian countries. Environ Manag Health 3:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran (2016) Iran Statistical Yearbook. March 23, 2016

  • Stotts R, Rice J, Wutich A, Brewis A, White D, Maupin J (2019) Cross-cultural knowledge and acceptance of wastewater reclamation and reuse processes across select sites. Hum Organ 78:311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis KP, Georgantzis N (2003) The role of information on farmers’ willingness to use recycled water for irrigation. Water Sci Technol 3:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis KP, Tsoumanis P, Charzoulakis K, Angelakis AN (2001) Water resources status including wastewater treatment and reuse in Greece: related problems and prospectives. Water Int 26:252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzortzakis N, Saridakis C, Chrysargyris A (2020) Treated wastewater and fertigation applied for greenhouse tomato cultivation grown in municipal solid waste compost and soil mixtures. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12:4287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam L (2004) The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:89–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester J, Timpano KR, Çek D, Lieberman D, Fieldstone SC, Broad K (2015) Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort. J Environ Psychol 42:1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghani SH, Mohammadzadeh M, Nadi M, Varzdar M (2013) Investigation of water challenges in South Khorasan Province and its role in security. National Congress of South Khorasan ‘Social Order and Security’, pp. 69–83 (in Persian)

  • Zhang W, Li Y, Wang C, Wang P, Wang Q, Wang D (2017) How could wastewater reuse in China meet the national ambitious water management strategy? Desalin Water Treat 76:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z, Wang H, Li A (2019) On the factors influencing public knowledge and acceptance of reclaimed water from a survey of three cities in northern China. J Water Reuse Desalin 9:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZD collected the field data, conducted statistical analysis of the data, and wrote the first draft in Persian language; AB conceptualized the study, supervised the methodology, validated the data, and wrote the original draft in English language; CAD validated the data, reviewed and edited the text, and prepared the final draft; ZF conducted statistical analysis of the data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Asghar Bagheri or Christos A. Damalas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is an observational study. Ethics committee approval before study start was not mandatory.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ta Yeong Wu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deh-Haghi, Z., Bagheri, A., Damalas, C.A. et al. Horticultural products irrigated with treated sewage: are they acceptable?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 54057–54068 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14552-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14552-8

Keywords

Navigation