Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of energy flow optimization on the mitigation of environmental consequences and costs in greenhouse cucumber production

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cucumber, as a major cultivated plant in Iran, takes up more than 80% of greenhouse production. So, improving the production efficiency can save energy, reduce the environmental consequences and production costs, and also create a lot of job opportunities. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of energy flow optimization on the environmental impacts and costs in greenhouse cucumber production by data envelopment analysis (DEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) methods. For environmental assessment, human health damage, ecosystem damage, and resource scarcity were considered and analyzed in the form of 8, 12, and 2 impact categories, respectively, using the ReCiPe2016 (H) method on endpoint level. Required data were collected through questionnaire from 30 cucumber growers. The results of the current status of environmental impacts showed the major contribution of fuels (natural gas and diesel) in all three main impact categories. Based on DEA analysis, 19 greenhouses (63%) were identified as inefficient units with a mean efficiency score of 0.70 (TE = 0.7). The highest inefficiency was related to the manure (72%), electricity (71.7%), and fuel (59%), respectively. Electricity and manure showed the highest saving potential, while the highest contribution to total energy saving was related to fuel (87%). Environmental analysis of optimized greenhouses showed that efficient use of inputs can reduce all environmental impacts between 7 and 80%, which highlights the importance of efficient resource management in this study. Also, production costs were decreased by about 67 $ tonne−1 (196 to 129 $) after the optimization of the units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

DMU:

Decision-making unit

LCI:

Life cycle inventory

LCIA:

Life cycle impact assessment

FU:

Functional unit

DALY:

Disability-adjusted life years

CCR:

Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes

BCC:

Banker, Charnes, and Cooper

VRS:

Variable returns to scale

CRS:

Constant returns to scale

TE:

Technical efficiency

PTE:

Pure technical efficiency

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran. The authors are grateful for the support provided by this University.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Farshad Soheilifard: conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, writing - original draft; Morteza Taki: conceptualization, resources, data curation, writing - review and editing, visualization; Rosalie van Zelm: methodology, software, resources, review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Taki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable in this section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable in this section.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Loubet

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soheilifard, F., Taki, M. & van Zelm, R. Impact of energy flow optimization on the mitigation of environmental consequences and costs in greenhouse cucumber production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8421–8433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11219-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11219-8

Keywords

Navigation