Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends and future challenges in hydrogen production and storage research

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid industrialization, increasing of fossil fuel consumption and the environmental impact, it is an inevitable trend to develop clean energy and renewable energy. Hydrogen, for its renewable and pollution-free characteristics, has become an important potential energy carrier. Hydrogen is regarded as a promising alternative fuel for fossil fuels in the future. Therefore, it is very necessary to summarize the technological progress in the development of hydrogen energy and research the status and future challenges. Hydrogen production and storage technology are the key problems for hydrogen application. This study applied bibliometric analysis to review the research features and trends of hydrogen production and storage study. Results showed that in the 2004–2018 period, China, USA and Japan leading in these research fields, the research and development in the world have grown rapidly. However, the development of hydrogen energy still faces the challenge of high production cost and high storage requirements. Photocatalytic decomposition of water to hydrogen has attracted more and more research in hydrogen production research, and the development of new hydrogen storage materials has become a key theme in hydrogen storage research. This study provides a comprehensive review of hydrogen production and storage and identifies research progress on future research trend in these fields. It would be helpful for policy-making and technology development and provide suggestions on the development of a hydrogen economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe JO, Popoola API, Ajenifuja E, Popoola OM (2019) Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: review and recommendation. Int J Hydrog Energy 44(29):15072–15086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acar C, Dincer I (2014) Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources. Int J Hydrog Energy 39(1):1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acar C, Dincer I (2019) Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. J Clean Prod 218:835–849

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balat M (2008) Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(15):4013–4029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard D, Brinks HW, Hauback BC, Norby P (2004) Desorption of LiAlH4 with Ti- and V-based additives. Mater Sci Eng B 108(1-2):54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir ME, Dincer I (2018) Cost assessment and evaluation of various hydrogen delivery scenarios. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(22):10420–10430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirci UB (2018) About the technological readiness of the H-2 generation by hydrolysis of B(-N)-H Compounds. Energy Technol 6(3):470–486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer I (2012) Green methods for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(2):1954–1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou Y, Sun L, Ren J, Dong L (2017) Chapter 10 - opportunities and future challenges in hydrogen economy for sustainable development. In: Scipioni A, Manzardo A, Ren J (eds) Hydrogen Economy. Academic Press, pp 277–305

  • Fang QR, Zhu GS, Xue M, Zhang QL, Sun JY, Guo XD, Qiu SL, Xu ST, Wang P, Wang DJ, Wei Y (2006) Microporous metal-organic framework constructed from heptanuclear zinc carboxylate secondary building units. Chem Eur J 12(14):3754–3758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floriano R, Deledda S, Hauback BC, Leiva DR, Botta WJ (2017) Iron and niobium based additives in magnesium hydride: microstructure and hydrogen storage properties. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(10):6810–6819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao YC, Jiang JG, Meng Y, Yan F, Aihemaiti A (2018) A review of recent developments in hydrogen production via biogas dry reforming. Energy Convers Manag 171:133–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger P, Kovacevic J (2019) A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Rev Educ Res 89(3):335–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Holladay JD, Hu J, King DL, Wang Y (2009) An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 139(4):244–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain I, Lal C, Jain A (2010) Hydrogen storage in Mg: a most promising material. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(10):5133–5144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khomenko V, Raymundo-Pinero E, Beguin F (2006) Optimisation of an asymmetric manganese oxide/activated carbon capacitor working at 2 V in aqueous medium. J Power Sources 153(1):183–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Lu RF, Wang Y, Wang X, Han KL, Deng WQ (2010) Lithium-doped conjugated microporous polymers for reversible hydrogen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(19):3330–3333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Roche R, Paire D, Miraoui A (2018) Optimal sizing of distributed generation in gas/electricity/heat supply networks. Energy 151:675–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Dai H, Song J, Sun L, Geng Y, Lu K, Hanaoka T (2019) Assessment of the carbon emissions reduction potential of China’s iron and steel industry based on a simulation analysis. Energy.

  • Liao B, Lei YQ, Chen LX, Lu GL, Pan HG, Wang QD (2004) Effect of the La/Mg ratio on the structure and electrochemical properties of LaxMg3-xNi9 (x=1.6-2.2) hydrogen storage electrode alloys for nickel-metal hydride batteries. J Power Sources 129(2):358–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KL, Kazemian H, Yaakob Z, Daud WW (2010) Solid-state materials and methods for hydrogen storage: a critical review. Chem Eng Technol 33(2):213–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YF, Cao YH, Huang L, Gao MX, Pan HG (2011) Rare earth-Mg-Ni-based hydrogen storage alloys as negative electrode materials for Ni/MH batteries. J Alloys Compd 509(3):675–686

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YZ, Heere M, Vasquez LC, Paterakis C, Sorby MH, Hauback BC, Book D (2018a) Dehydrogenation and rehydrogenation of a 0.62LiBH(4)-0.38NaBH(4) mixture with nano-sized Ni. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(34):16782–16792

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YF, Ren ZH, Zhang X, Jian N, Yang YX, Gao MX, Pan HG (2018b) Development of catalyst-enhanced sodium alanate as an advanced hydrogen-storage material for mobile applications. Energy Technology 6(3):487–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wang J, Li C, Chen B, Sun Y (2019) Using bibliometric analysis to understand the recent progress in agroecosystem services research. Ecol Econ 156:293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamori Y, Orimo S (2004) Destabilization of Li-based complex hydrides. J Alloys Compd 370(1-2):271–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rather S-U, Zacharia R, Hwang SW, Kim AR, Nahm KS (2009) Hydrogen storage of nanostructured TiO2-impregnated carbon nanotubes. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(2):961–966

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seo JG, Youn MH, Cho KM, Park S, Lee SH, In JL, Song K (2008) Effect of Al2O3-ZrO2 xerogel support on hydrogen production by steam reforming of LNG over Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalyst. Korean J Chem Eng 25(1):41–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shin JH, Yoon JH, Ahn EK, Kim MS, Sim SJ, Park TH (2007) Fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Enterobacter asburiae SNU-1. Int J Hydrog Energy 32(2):192–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Singh S, Kumar A (2016) Hydrogen energy future with formic acid: a renewable chemical hydrogen storage system. Catal Sci Technol 6(1):12–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinigaglia T, Freitag TE, Kreimeier F, Martins MES (2019) Use of patents as a tool to map the technological development involving the hydrogen economy. World Patent Inf 56:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorgulu F, Dincer I (2018) Thermodynamic analyses of a solar-based combined cycle integrated with electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(2):1047–1059

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Qiu XP, Wu F, Zhu WT (2005) H-2 from steam reforming of ethanol at low temperature over Ni/Y2O3, Ni/La2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for fuel-cell application. Int J Hydrog Energy 30(4):437–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Li H, Dong L, Fang K, Ren J, Geng Y, Fujii M, Zhang W, Zhang N, Liu Z (2017) Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and energy evaluation approach: a case of Liuzhou city, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 119:78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Geng Y, Sarkis J, Zhong S (2018) Trends and features of embodied flows associated with international trade based on bibliometric analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 131:148–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay M-Y (2008) A bibliometric analysis of hydrogen energy literature, 1965–2005. Scientometrics 75(3):421–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulleberg O, Nakken T, Ete A (2010) The wind/hydrogen demonstration system at Utsira in Norway: evaluation of system performance using operational data and updated hydrogen energy system modeling tools. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(5):1841–1852

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Umegaki T, Yan JM, Zhang XB, Shioyama H, Kuriyama N, Xu Q (2009) Boron- and nitrogen-based chemical hydrogen storage materials. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(5):2303–2311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JL, Wan W (2008) Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(12):2934–2941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Yin Y (2018) Fermentative hydrogen production using various biomass-based materials as feedstock. Renew Sust Energ Rev 92:284–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Cao HJ, Zhang WJ, Chen J, Wu H, Pistidda C, Ju XH, Zhou W, Wu GT, Etter M, Klassen T, Dornheim M, Chen P (2018a) Li2NH-LiBH4: a complex hydride with near ambient hydrogen adsorption and fast lithium ion conduction. Chem Eur J 24(6):1342–1347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang KK, Wu GL, Cao HJ, Li HL, Zhao XS (2018b) Improved reversible dehydrogenation properties of MgH2 by the synergetic effects of graphene oxide-based porous carbon and TiCl3. Int J Hydrog Energy 43(15):7440–7446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong YM, Wu TY, Juan JC (2014) A review of sustainable hydrogen production using seed sludge via dark fermentation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:471–482

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Wang JL (2018) Kinetics and microbial community analysis for hydrogen production using raw grass inoculated with different pretreated mixed culture. Bioresour Technol 247:954–962

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Jin ZL, Hu HY, Bi YP, Lu GX (2018) Ni-Mo-S nanoparticles modified graphitic C3N4 for efficient hydrogen evolution. Appl Surf Sci 427:587–597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz B, Kazimi MS (2006) Efficiency of hydrogen production systems using alternative nuclear energy technologies. Int J Hydrog Energy 31(1):77–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu HD, Xue YR, Hui L, Zhang C, Li YJ, Zuo ZC, Zhao YJ, Li ZB, Li YL (2018) Efficient hydrogen production on a 3D flexible heterojunction material. Adv Mater 30(21):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanghelini GM, de Souza Junior HRA, Kulay L, Cherubini E, Ribeiro PT, Soares SR (2016) A bibliometric overview of Brazilian LCA research. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(12):1759–1775

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan WW, Zhu QL, Xu Q (2016) Dehydrogenation of ammonia borane by metal nanoparticle catalysts. ACS Catal 6(10):6892–6905

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BC, Tang XL, Li Y, Xu YD, Shen WJ (2007) Hydrogen production from steam reforming of ethanol and glycerol over ceria-supported metal catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 32(13):2367–2373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JY, Wang YH, Jin J, Zhang J, Lin Z, Huang F, Yu JG (2013) Efficient visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and enhanced photostability of core/shell CdS/g-C3N4 nanowires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(20):10317–10324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Leng ZH, Gao MX, Hu JJ, Du F, Yao JH, Pan HG, Liu YF (2018) Enhanced hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 catalyzed with carbon-supported nanocrystalline TiO2. J Power Sources 398:183–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P, Liu P, Zhao Y, Yang J (2012) Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(1):1048–1057

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71461137008, 71325006, 71311140172 and 51708414) and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (3-1709, 3-1905, 2-1404 and 1-1801).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Sun.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Sun, L., Li, Z. et al. Trends and future challenges in hydrogen production and storage research. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 31092–31104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09470-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09470-0

Keywords

Navigation