Abstract
Large amounts of fracturing flowback and wastewater with complex compositions are produced during hydraulic fracturing. Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water (HF-FPW) is an important initial step in efforts to determine a suitable treatment method for this type of wastewater. In the present study, fracturing flowback and produced water samples were obtained from well CN-F and well CN-E in the prophase and anaphase stages of the Changning shale gas mining area. Chemical characterization of inorganic and organic substances was then conducted. Metal contents were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), and all inorganic anions involved were determined by ion chromatography. The organic pollutant components were analyzed in detail by combining Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Results showed that samples contained salt (TDS = 30,000–50,000 mg/L), metals (e.g., 650 ± 50 mg/L calcium), and total organic carbon (TOC = 32–178 mg/L). The organic substances detected in all samples could be divided into six categories, alkanes, aromatics, halogenated hydrocarbons, alcohols, esters, and ketones. C6–C21 straight-chain alkanes and C7–C13 naphthenes had the highest amount of organic matter, reaching more than 48%. The organic matter contained fracturing fluid additives, such as surfactants (e.g., ethylene glycol), and nitrotrichloromethane, which is a chlorinated product of some additives. These results provide information on the chemical composition of HF-FPW in Sichuan, China, as well as a basis for subsequent processing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alley B, Beebe A, Rodgers J, Castle JW (2011) Chemical and physical characterization of produced waters from conventional and unconventional fossil fuel resources. Chemosphere 85:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.043
Ayanda OS, Olutona GO, Olumayede EG, Akintayo CO, Ximba BJ (2016) Phenols, flame retardants and phthalates in water and wastewater – a global problem. Water Sci Technol 74:1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.314
Bao J, He Q, Zufeng P et al (2017) Optimization of composite flocculation treatment for shale gas fracturing flowback fluid. Drill Product Technol 40:90–93. https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2017.04.29
Barbot E, Vidic NS, Gregory KB, Vidic RD (2013) Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from Devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing. Environ Sci Technol 47:2562–2569. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304638h
Bergmann A, Weber F-A, Meiners H, Müller F (2014) Potential water-related environmental risks of hydraulic fracturing employed in exploration and exploitation of unconventional natural gas reservoirs in Germany. Environ Sci Eur 26:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-26-10
Butkovskyi A, Bruning H, Kools SAE, Rijnaarts HHM, van Wezel AP (2017) Organic pollutants in shale gas flowback and produced waters: identification, potential ecological impact, and implications for treatment strategies. Environ Sci Technol 51:4740–4754. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05640
Chang H, Li T, Liu B, Vidic RD, Elimelech M, Crittenden JC (2019) Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water from shale gas and oil plays: a review. Desalination 455:34–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.001
Chen W, Luo Z, Wu C, Wen P, Li Q (2019) Oxidative removal of recalcitrant organics in shale gas flowback fluid by the microwave-activated persulfate process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:684–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3668-5
Entrekin S, Evans-White M, Johnson B, Hagenbuch E (2011) Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters. Front Ecol Environ 9:503–511
Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA (2011) Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7:181–186. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.3.181
Guo Z-B, Lin Y-L, Xu B, Hu CY, Huang H, Zhang TY, Chu WH, Gao NY (2016) Factors affecting THM, HAN and HNM formation during UV-chlor(am)ination of drinking water. Chem Eng J 306:1180–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.051
He Y, Flynn SL, Folkerts EJ, Zhang Y, Ruan D, Alessi DS, Martin JW, Goss GG (2017) Chemical and toxicological characterizations of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water. Water Res 114:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.027
Hull NM, Rosenblum JS, Robertson CE, Harris JK, Linden KG (2018) Succession of toxicity and microbiota in hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water in the Denver–Julesburg Basin. Sci Total Environ 644:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.067
Ji C, Zhong Y, Ying F, Songlin F (1992) COD determination of high cl- wastewater in oil and gas fields. J Southwestern Petroleum Institute 14:94–101. https://doi.org/10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.1992.04.013
Jiang Q, Rentschler J, Perrone R, Liu K (2013) Application of ceramic membrane and ion-exchange for the treatment of the flowback water from Marcellus shale gas production. J Membr Sci 431:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.030
Kargbo DM, Wilhelm RG, Campbell DJ (2010) Natural gas plays in the Marcellus shale: challenges and potential opportunities. Environ Sci Technol 44:5679–5684. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903811p
Kerr Richard A (2010) Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science 328:1624–1626
Kong F, Sun G, Chen J, Han JD, Guo CM, Tong-Zhang, Lin XF, Xie YF (2018) Desalination and fouling of NF/low pressure RO membrane for shale gas fracturing flowback water treatment. Sep Purif Technol 195:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.017
Konschnik K, Dayalu A (2016) Hydraulic fracturing chemicals reporting: analysis of available data and recommendations for policymakers. Energy Policy 88:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.002
Lester Y, Ferrer I, Thurman EM, Sitterley KA, Korak JA, Aiken G, Linden KG (2015) Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment. Sci Total Environ 512–513:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.043
Luek JL, Gonsior M (2017) Organic compounds in hydraulic fracturing fluids and wastewaters: a review. Water Res 123:536–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.012
Lutz BD, Lewis AN, Doyle MW (2013) Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus shale gas development. Water Resour Res 49:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20096
Maguire-Boyle SJ, Barron AR (2014) Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells. Environ Sci 16:2237–2248. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00376D
McLaughlin MC, Borch T, Blotevogel J (2016) Spills of hydraulic fracturing chemicals on agricultural topsoil: biodegradation, sorption, and co-contaminant interactions. Environ Sci Technol 50:6071–6078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00240
Oetjen K, Thomas L (2016) Volatile and semi-volatile organic compound patterns in flowback waters from fracturing sites within the Marcellus shale. Environ Earth Sci 75:1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5847-3
Olsson O, Weichgrebe D, Rosenwinkel K-H (2013) Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany: composition, treatment, concerns. Environ Earth Sci 70:3895–3906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2535-4
Orem W, Tatu C, Varonka M, Lerch H, Bates A, Engle M, Crosby L, McIntosh J (2014) Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale. Int J Coal Geol 126:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2014.01.003
Rivard C, Lavoie D, Lefebvre R, Séjourné S, Lamontagne C, Duchesne M (2014) An overview of Canadian shale gas production and environmental concerns. Int J Coal Geol 126:64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.12.004
Shaffer DL, Arias Chavez LH, Ben-Sasson M, Romero-Vargas Castrillón S, Yip NY, Elimelech M (2013) Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ Sci Technol 47:9569–9583. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401966e
Shih J-S, Saiers JE, Anisfeld SC, Chu Z, Muehlenbachs LA, Olmstead SM (2015) Characterization and analysis of liquid waste from Marcellus shale gas development. Environ Sci Technol 49:9557–9565. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01780
Struchtemeyer CG, Elshahed MS (2012) Bacterial communities associated with hydraulic fracturing fluids in thermogenic natural gas wells in North Central Texas, USA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01196.x
Vengosh A, Warner N, Jackson R, Darrah T (2013) The effects of shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing on the quality of water resources in the United States. Proc Earth Planet Sci 7:863–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2013.03.213
Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48:8334–8348. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405118y
Vidic RD, Brantley SL, Vandenbossche JM, Yoxtheimer D, Abad JD (2013) Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340:1235009–1235009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235009
Wang W (2010) Determination of anions in oilfield water by ion chromatography. Oil Gas Field Surf Eng 29:3–4. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896.2010.07.002
Wang D, Duan X, He X, Dionysiou DD (2016) Degradation of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) by UV-254 nm/H2O2 photochemical oxidation: kinetics and influence of various process parameters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23772–23780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7569-1
Wilson JM, VanBriesen JM (2012) Research articles: oil and gas produced water management and surface drinking water sources in Pennsylvania. Environ Pract 14:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046612000427
Wu Q, Zheng M, Hu Y (2014) Shale gas produced water contamination and its comprehensive treatment. Sci Technol Rev 32:74–83. https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.13.013
Zhang X, Sun AY, Duncan IJ (2016) Shale gas wastewater management under uncertainty. J Environ Manag 165:188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.038
Zou C, Dong D, Wang S, Li J, Li X, Wang Y, Li D, Cheng K (2010) Geological characteristics and resource potential of shale gas in China. Pet Explor Dev 37:641–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60001-3
Funding
This work was carried out with the financial supports of the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2016ZX05062).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Ester Heath
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 478 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, B., Xiong, M., Wang, P. et al. Chemical characterization in hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water (HF-FPW) of shale gas in Sichuan of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 26532–26542 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08670-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08670-y