Introduction

Mosquitoes constitute a major public health problem acting as vectors of serious diseases like malaria, filariasis, Japanese encephalitis, dengue fever, chikungunya, yellow fever, Zika virus, and others (Benelli and Mehlhorn 2016; Ashokan et al. 2017; Benelli and Romano 2017). Culex quinquefasciatus Say is a major vector of lymphatic filariasis, which affects 120 million people worldwide. Furthermore, about 400 million people are at risk of contracting filariasis, resulting in an annual economic loss of 1.5 billion dollars (WHO 2002, 2014; Vadivalagan et al. 2017). Cx. quinquefasciatus is also a potential vector of West Nile virus and Rift Valley fever virus (Farajollahi et al. 2011; Linthicum et al. 2016). Additionally, Cx. quinquefasciatus can transmit Japanese encephalitis virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, reticuloendotheliosis virus Murray Valley encephalitis, and reovirus type 3 (Sakthivadivel et al. 2016).

The control of arthropods, with special reference to filarasis vectors, such as Cx. quinquefasciatus, as well as other mosquito species, has been enhanced in several areas, but there are main challenges, including increasing resistance to pesticides (Naqqash et al. 2016; Benelli and Beier 2017), massive non-target effects (Anyaele and Amusan 2003), and lack of cost-effective and eco-friendly products (Amer and Mehlhorn 2006a, b; Nathan et al. 2006; Rahuman et al. 2009; Benelli 2015a, b; Pavela and Benelli 2016; Banumathi et al. 2017).

Bionanoscience is a fast-growing research field nowadays (Kumar et al. 2010; Benelli and Lukehart 2017). Several approaches are available for the synthesis of nanoparticles. They include thermal decomposition (Navaladian et al. 2007), chemical reduction (Krishna and Dan 2009), photochemical reactions in reverse micelles (Taleb et al. 1997), electrochemical routes (Starowicz et al. 2006), microwave-assisted processes (Sreeram et al. 2008), and even green chemistry reduction routes (Begum et al. 2009; Ahmad et al. 2010; Raut et al. 2010; Iravani 2011). The latter can be done relying to the use of fungal and bacteria filtrates, as well as various plant extracts (Holmes et al. 1995; He et al. 2007; Nair and Pradeep 2002; Mukherjee et al. 2001; Saha et al. 2010; Shankar et al. 2004a, b; Saxena et al. 2010; Benelli 2016a, b). Green approaches provide noticeable advantages over chemical and physical methods, as they are cost-effective, do not need the use of highly toxic chemicals and can be easily scaled up for large-scale preparations. However, while a wide number of green fabrication routes have been carried out to produce Ag, ZnO, and Au nanoparticles with relevant toxicity against mosquitoes (Rajakumar and Rahuman 2011; Roni et al. 2015; Benelli et al. 2017a, b), the toxicity of iron and iron oxide nanoparticles against these important vectors has been scarcely investigated (Murugan et al. 2017).

Iron nanoparticles have attracted considerable interest due to their super paramagnetic properties and their potential biomedical applications arising from their biocompatibility and non-toxicity (Pankhurst et al. 2003). Therefore, iron nanoparticles have been used in magnetic resonance imaging, drug delivery, tissue repair, immunoassays, detoxification of biological fluids, hyperthermia and in cell separation (Vicky et al. 2010). The green biosynthesis of iron and iron oxide nanoparticles showing different sizes and shapes has been carried out using bacteria (Yeary et al. 2005), fungi (Roh and Moon 2006) as well as plant extracts (Senthil and Ramesh 2012). To the best of our knowledge, no studies focused on the toxicity of iron (Fe0) and iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles against mosquitoes. Therefore, here we investigated the synthesis of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles through green and chemical reduction methods, respectively.

In several parts of the world, herbal preparations containing plant parts from Ficus species are used in traditional medicine, including for the treatment of malaria (Iwu 1993; Burkill 1997; Mandal et al. 2000; Titanji et al. 2008; Kuete et al. 2008, 2009; Chinsembu and Hedimbi 2010; Jansen et al. 2010). For the green synthesis of Fe0 nanoparticles, we selected a plant of phytochemical interest, the “mutuba tree” Ficus natalensis Hochst., an evergreen tree of 6–21 m high, with a rounded spread and dense crown (Rodriguez and Wrangham 1993; Woodland 1997; Adriens 2005). Despite the numerous traditional uses of this species, with special reference to the African region (Veale et al. 1992; Rabe and Van Staden 1997; Tabuti 2007), the potential of this plant as a green insecticide and reducing agent for nanosynthesis has not been tested.

Therefore, in this work, Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles produced by chemical and F. natalensis-mediated green nanosynthesis were analyzed by UV–Vis spectrophotometry, FT-IR spectroscopy, XRD analysis, SEM, and EDX assays. Both Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles were tested on larvae (instars from I to IV) and pupae of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Furthermore, we monitored the predation efficiency of a mosquito natural enemy, i.e., the guppy fish Poecilia reticulata Peters, after a single treatment with sub-lethal doses of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles.

Materials and methods

Green synthesis of Fe0 nanoparticles

F. natalensis was collected from Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Southern India; the F. natalensis leaves were washed with tap water and shade-dried at 25 °C for 10 days. The F. natalensis extract was prepared as described by Dinesh et al. (2015), it was then filtered using Whatman No. 1, and stored at − 4 °C till nanosynthesis. In the green nanosynthesis process, the F. natalensis filtrate was mixed with an aqueous 1 mM Fe3O4 solution in an Erlenmeyer flask and incubated at 25 °C. A darker solution indicated the formation of iron nanoparticles, since aqueous Fe3+ was reduced to Fe0. Fe3O4 was purchased from Precision Scientific Co. (Coimbatore, India).

Chemical synthesis of Fe2O3 nanoparticles

One millimole of Fe(NO3)3.9 H2O was dissolved in 10 mL of double-distilled water, and 2 mmol of citric acid monohydrate was dissolved in 10 mL of double-distilled water. After 1 h, the acid solution was mixed into ferric solution and gently vortexed for 1 h. The homogeneous colloidal solution was poured in to a 40-mL Teflon flask hydrothermal autoclave and kept it in hot air oven at 180 °C for 12 h. The precipitated Fe2O3 nanoparticles were collected and washed with double-distilled water up to neutral pH. Then, the Fe2O3 nanoparticles were dried at 110 °C for 1 h and calcined for 2 h at 700 °C.

Characterization of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles

The Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles were analyzed by UV–Vis spectrophotometry, FT-IR spectroscopy, XRD analysis, SEM, and EDX assays, following the methods described by Sujitha et al. (2015) and Qu et al. (2014), respectively. UV–Vis spectrophotometry was done at the wavelength of 200–800 nm in a UV-3600 Shimadzu spectrophotometer (1 nm resolution). SEM was carried out using a FEI Quanta 200 SEM. FTIR spectroscopy (Stuart 2002) was done with a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 2000 FTIR spectrophotometer (Sujitha et al. 2015).

Toxicity against Cx. quinquefasciatus

A pathogen- and parasite-free strain of Cx. quinquefasciatus was originally established as described by Murugan et al. (2015d) in laboratory conditions [27 ± 2 °C; 7–85% R.H.; 14:10 (L:D)]. Eggs were kindly provided by the National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) field station of Mettupalayam (Tamil Nadu). In the toxicity assays, 25 Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae (first, second, third, or fourth instar) or pupae were placed for 24 h in a glass beaker filled with 250 mL of dechlorinated water plus the desired concentration of the F. natalensis leaf extract, Fe0 or Fe2O3 nanoparticles, following the method by Mahesh Kumar et al. (2016), each concentration was replicated five times against all instars. Control mosquitoes were exposed for 24 h to clean water without Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles or the plant extract (Govindarajan et al. 2016a).

Impact of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on guppy predation

Guppies, P. reticulata, were collected from rural ponds in Coimbatore (India), identified by a taxonomist at the Department of Zoology of Bharathiar University (Coimbatore, India), and maintained in laboratory [27 ± 2 °C and 75–85% R.H.; 14:10 (L: D)] as reported by Murugan et al. (2015d). Guppies were studied for their predatory activity towards the II and III instar larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus. For each tested instar, 400 mosquito larvae plus 1 adult P. reticulata were introduced in a plastic cup arena containing 5 L of dechlorinated water plus sub-lethal concentrations of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles (tested concentration: 1/3 of the LC50 calculated on I instar Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, see Murugan et al. 2015b). For predation in standard laboratory conditions, Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles were not added to the arenas containing guppy fishes and Cx. quinquefasciatus individuals. All cups were checked after 12 and 24 h (corresponding to night and day time) and the larvae consumed by guppies was recorded. Predated larvae were replaced with new ones from a same age cohort. To standardize the appetence of P. reticulata fishes, all tested fishes were food-deprived for 24 h before testing. Predatory efficiency of P. reticulata was calculated using the formula by Subramaniam et al. (2016).

Statistical analysis

Cx. quinquefasciatus larval and pupal mortality data were analyzed by probit analysis, calculating LC50 and LC90 values, 95% CI, regression equation, and chi squares following the method by Finney (1971). Chi squares were not significant (Benelli 2017). Guppy predation data were analyzed using a generalized linear model y = Xβ + ε described by Murugan et al. (2015b) with two fixed factors (i.e., treatment and targeted instar). P < 0.05 was used to assess the significance of differences among mean values.

Results and discussion

Characterization of iron nanoparticles

The UV–Vis spectrum of the Fe0 nanoparticles is provided in Fig. 1a, showing an absorption maxima at 255 nm in visible range between 200 to 800 nm wavelengths. The green synthesis of Fe nanoparticles was confirmed within 120 min after that the F. natalensis leaf extract was added to the Fe3O4 solution; the color changed from pale yellow to dark brown (Fig. 1b), and this probably arise from surface plasmon resonance of the nanostructures (Shankar et al., 2004a, b). The absorption spectrum of Fe2O3 nanoparticles showed a maximum absorption peak at 90 nm (Fig. 1c), at variance with the absorption maximum recently reported at 272 nm in the UV–Vis spectrum of Fe2O3 nanoparticles (Tharani and Nehru 2015). Earlier, it has been noted that the characteristic surface plasmon resonance band of Fe3O4 mostly occurred at wavelength within the range of 190–250 nm, as a function of different concentrations of metal ions with different volumes of plant extracts (Al-Kalifawi 2015). Also, Basavegowda et al. (2014a, b) reported comparable UV–Vis spectra for Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized using extracts of Artemisia annua and Perilla frutescens.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a UV–Vis spectrum of iron nanoparticles green synthesized using the Ficus natalensis leaf extract. b This panel shows the color changes before and after the process of reduction of Fe3+ to Fe0 nanoparticles. c UV–Vis absorption spectrum of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles chemically synthesized; both spectra were recorded after 120 min from the start of the reaction

The XRD pattern of Fe2O3 nanoparticles is showed in Fig. 2a, contains a number of peaks, which are clearly distinguishable (Fu et al. 2001). The obtained data matched with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) File No. (87-1166). The fact indicates that the nanoparticles Fe2O3 crystals may develop preferentially rather than randomly (Joya et al. 2013). Figure 2b showed the phase purity and crystallinity of Fe0 nanoparticles. XRD pattern showed intense peaks corresponding to the (111), (200), (311), (222), and (220) sets of lattice planes. The sharp Bragg peaks reported above might also result from capping agents stabilizing the iron nanoparticles (see Chen et al. 2009; Farrukh et al. 2013).

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD of the a Fe2O3 chemically synthesized and b Ficus natalensis-synthesized iron nanoparticles

SEM was used to confirm the morphology of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles (Fig. 3a), which were spherical in shape, while SEM observations on green synthesized Fe0 nanoparticles showed different shapes, including rod-like structures, with size ranging from 35 to 40 nm (Fig. 3b). Concerning other syntheses of iron nanoparticles, it has been elucidated that Fe3O4 synthesized by co-precipitation with different reagents (FeCl3.6H2O, FeCl2.4H2O, propylene glycol, and ammonium hydroxide) had mean size of 8 nm (Shen et al. 2009). Mono-dispersity control is very important since the properties of nanocrystals strongly depend to the dimension of nanoparticles (Sophie et al. 2008).

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM shows the morphological characteristics of a chemically synthesized Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and b Ficus natalensis-synthesized iron nanoparticles

Figure 4a–b shows EDX strong peaks for Fe and O confirming their presence in the formation of iron and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. In agreement with our work, Hariani et al. (2013) reported strong peaks of Fe and O (see also Noruzi et al. 2012). The composition of Fe2O3 nanoparticles formed by co-precipitation synthesis was Fe 73.36% and O 21.02%. The EDX spectrum recorded from iron nanoparticles showed a distinct signal and high atomic percent values for iron (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

EDX shows the chemical constituents of a chemically synthesized Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and b green-synthesized iron nanoparticles

Figure 5a showed the FT-IR spectrum of Fe2O3 nanoparticles with peaks at 3138, 1645, 1401, 894, and 790 cm−1, denoting stretching in O–H, C=O, and C–O bonds of carboxylic acids and 850-out-of-plane C–H vibration, respectively (Al-Bawabe et al. 1998; Srinivas et al. 2013). Green fabricated iron nanoparticles showed a main peak at 3450.80 (Fig. 5b) as well as some peaks decreasing in intensity at 2313.71, 530.45, and 450.45 cm−1, the presence of active functional groups in this extract can play a role for the swift reduction of iron ions to iron nanoparticles (Yew et al. 2016). Similarly, Yuvakkumar and Hong (2014) reported the presence of phenolic compounds and proteins responsible for the formation and stabilization of synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FT-IR spectrum of a chemically synthesized Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and b iron nanoparticles synthesized using the Ficus natalensis leaf extract

Toxicity against Cx. quinquefasciatus

The F. natalensis leaf extract showed limited larvicidal and pupicidal properties on Cx. quinquefasciatus; LC50 values ranged from 234.6 ppm (I instar larvae), 259.0 ppm (II instar), 317.7 ppm (III instar), 400.1 ppm (IV instar), and 504.1 (pupae) ppm, respectively (Table 1); a dose-dependent effect was found, as reported for a growing number of botanicals recently tested against mosquito vectors (Amer and Mehlhorn 2006b, Dinesh et al. 2015; Murugan et al. 2015a, b, c; Govindarajan and Benelli 2016). Concerning the genus Ficus, Chung et al. (2011) reported that the milky sap of F. carica has a toxic effect against early fourth stage larvae of Aedes aegypti with an LC50 value of 10.2 µg/mL and an LC90 value of 42.3 µg/mL (Chung et al. 2011).

Table 1 Larval and pupal toxicity of the Ficus natalensis leaf extract against the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus

Furthermore, in larvicidal and pupicidal experiments conducted testing Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on Cx. quinquefasciatus, LC50 values of green fabricated iron nanoparticles ranged from 20.9 (I instar larvae) to 43.7 ppm (pupae) (Table 2), while they were from 4.5 (I) to 22.1 ppm (pupae) for Fe2O3 nanoparticles synthesized chemically (Table 3). To the best of our knowledge, the toxic potential of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles against mosquito vectors has not been investigated yet, with the only exception of a very recent study by Murugan et al. (2017), where magnetic nanoparticles from the magnetosomes of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense were tested against A. aegypti mosquitoes and as growth inhibitor of dengue virus serotype DEN-2.

Table 2 Larval and pupal toxicity of Ficus natalensis-synthesized iron nanoparticles against Culex quinquefasciatus
Table 3 Larval and pupal toxicity of chemically synthesized Fe2O3 nanoparticles against Culex quinquefasciatus

On the other hand, a wide number of studies have investigated the potential of silver, gold, and ZnO nanoparticles against various mosquito species as well as microbial pathogens (Arokiyaraj et al. 2013; Pavela and Benelli 2016; Benelli et al. 2017b). Ag nanoparticles produced using a green method based on the employ of the aqueous bark extract of Ficus racemosa also showed high larvicidal activity against mosquitoes (Velayutham et al. 2013). Besides, it should be noted that the toxicity of the iron and iron oxide nanoparticles tested in the present research is lower if compared to some selected plant essential oils, as pointed out by Pavela (2015a), who highlighted the toxicity of seven essential oils with larvicidal LC50 lower than 10 ppm. Later, Govindarajan and Benelli (2016), Alshebly et al. (2017), Govindarajan et al. (2017), and Benelli et al. (2017c) isolated several molecules (e.g., ar-curcumene, (4E,6Z)-allo-ocimene and carvotanacetone) from medicinal plant essential oils showing larvicidal LC50 values lower than 8 ppm, while Pavela (2015b) and Benelli et al. (2017d) shed light on synergistic effects of selected plant essential oils formulated in highly effective larvicidal blends against Cx. quinquefasciatus.

The mechanism of action of iron and iron oxide nanoparticles against mosquitoes, as well as on other arthropod vectors, still needs to be clarified, as recently stressed also for silver, gold, titania, and zinc oxide nanoparticles (Benelli et al. 2017e), while it has been observed that the toxicity exerted by magnetic nanoparticles against DEN-2 virus is partially due to inhibiting the expression of the envelope (E) protein (Murugan et al. 2017).

Impact of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on guppy predation

In standard laboratory assays, after 24 h, P. reticulata predation rates towards II and III instar larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus were 62.7 (II) and 45.5% (III) (Table 4). II instar larvae were probably preferred by P. reticulata because of their smaller size thus reduced mobility. Post-treatment with Fe0 nanoparticles, P. reticulata predation was boosted to 75.4% on II instar larvae, and 59.0% on III instar larvae (Table 4), respectively. Post-treatment with Fe2O3 nanoparticles, predation was boosted to 79.2 and 61.0%, respectively (Table 4). The enhanced predation rates of guppies on Cx. quinquefasciatus’ younger larvae may be due to a higher impact of nanoparticles treatment on mosquito physiological and metabolic activities, leading to higher motility reduction in II instar larvae over to III instar ones, as previously discussed by Murugan et al. (2015b, e). Besides, no detectable toxicity was observed on P. reticulata individuals exposed to Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles over a week (data not shown).

Table 4 Predation of the guppy fish, Poecilia reticulata, against larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus in standard conditions and in an aquatic environment contaminated by sub-lethal doses of green-synthesized iron nanoparticles and chemically synthesized Fe2O3 nanoparticles

A number of recent studies supported the eco-friendly nature of green-synthesized nanoparticles used for mosquito control, since—at the doses used to fight mosquito young instars—they showed no or limited toxicity against non-target species, including mosquito natural enemies (Patil et al. 2012a, b; Haldar et al. 2013; Rawani et al. 2013b; Murugan et al. 2015c; Ramanibai and Velayutham 2015; Mahesh Kumar et al. 2016). However, the employ of nanoformulated metals and metal oxides in the aquatic environment is still debated and more knowledge in needed about potential long-term effects due to the exposure to nanoparticles, including risks of genotoxicity (Benelli et al. 2017b).

Conclusions

Overall, even if the control of filariasis mosquito vectors has been ameliorated in several areas, there are main challenges, including increasing resistance to insecticides and lack of cost-effective and eco-friendly products. In the present investigation, we discovered the high larvicidal and pupicidal activity of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles testing them against Cx. quinquefasciatus. Notably, the predation efficiency of the guppy fish, P. reticulata, after a single treatment with sub-lethal doses of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles, was boosted. In conclusion, this work provides new insights report about the toxicity of Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles against mosquito vectors. Therefore, we argued that green- and chemical-fabricated Fe0 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles may be considered to develop novel and effective pesticides.