Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mineralogy and geochemistry of efflorescent minerals on mine tailings and their potential impact on water chemistry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the gold mining Witwatersrand Basin of South Africa, efflorescent mineral crusts are a common occurrence on and nearby tailings dumps during the dry season. The crusts are readily soluble and generate acidic, metal- and sulphate-rich solutions on dissolution. In this study, the metal content of efflorescent crusts at an abandoned gold mine tailings dump was used to characterise surface and groundwater discharges from the site. Geochemical modelling of the pH of the solution resulting from the dissolution of the crusts was used to better understand the crusts’ potential impact on water chemistry. The study involved two approaches: (i) conducting leaching experiments on oxidised and unoxidised tailings using artificial rainwater and dilute sulphuric acid and correlating the composition of crusts to these leachates and (ii) modelling the dissolution of the crusts in order to gain insight into their mineralogy and their potential impact on receiving waters. The findings suggested that there were two chemically distinct discharges from the site, namely an aluminium- and magnesium-rich surface water plume and an iron-rich groundwater plume. The first plume was observed to originate from the oxidised tailings following leaching with rainwater while the second plume originated from the underlying unoxidised tailings with leaching by sulphuric acid. Both groups of minerals forming from the respective plumes were found to significantly lower the pH of the receiving water with simulations of their dissolution found to be within 0.2 pH units of experimental values. It was observed that metals in a low abundance within the crust (for example, iron) had a stronger influence on the pH of the resulting solutions than metals in a greater abundance (aluminium or magnesium). Techniques such as powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and in situ mineral determination techniques such as remote sensing can effectively determine the dominant mineralogy. However, the minerals or metals incorporated through solid solution into bulk mineralogy that dominates the chemistry of the solutions upon their dissolution may occur in minor quantities that can only be predicted using chemical analysis. Their mineralogy can be predicted using geochemical modelling and can provide a set of hypothetical minerals that upon dissolution yield a solution similar to that of the actual crusts. This realisation has a bearing on decision-making such as in risk assessment and designing pollutant mitigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bache BW (1986) Aluminium mobilization in soils and waters. J Geol Soc 143:699–706. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.143.4.0699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakatula EN, Cukrowska EM, Chimuka L, Tutu H (2012) Characterisation of cyanide in a natural stream impacted by gold mining activities in the Witwatersrand Basin. J of Toxicological and Env Chem 94:7–19. doi:10.1080/02772248.2011.638637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham JM, Nordstrom DK (2000) Iron and aluminum hydroxysulfates from acid sulfate waters. Rev Mineral Geochem 40:351–403. doi:10.2138/rmg.2000.40.7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camden-Smith BPC, Mthombeni P, Johnson RH, Weiersbye IM and Tutu H (2013) The release and transport of metals arising from gold mining tailings storage facilities in the Witwatersrand, South Africa. International Mine Water Association Proceedings: “Interdisciplinary Responses to Mine Water Challenges”, Xuzhou, China, 157-160. ISBN 978-0-615-79385-6

  • Chamier J, Wicht M, Cyster L, Ndindi NP (2015) Aluminium (Al) fractionation and speciation:getting closer to describing the factors influencing Al(3+) in water impacted by acid mine drainage. Chemosphere 130:17–23. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.01.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatin V, Blanc D, Borschneck D, Delolme C (2013) Determining the experimental leachability of copper, lead, and zinc in a harbor sediment and modelling. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:66–74. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1233-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocksedge JL (1988) The design and production of synthetic rainwater samples. Warren Spring Laboratory Report, LR684, Stevenage, United Kingdom. ISBN 0-85624-544-5

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, physical and chemical methods. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/1312.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2014

  • Hageman P (2007) U.S. Geological Survey field leach test for assessing water reactivity and leaching potential of mine wastes, soils, and other geologic and environmental materials. In: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 5, Chapter D3. U.S. Geological Survey, Virginia

  • Hammarstrom JM, Seal RR II, Meier AL, Kornfeld JM (2005) Secondary sulfate minerals associated with acid drainage in the eastern US: recycling of metals and acidity in surficial environments. Chem Geol 215:407–431. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris DL, Lottermoser BG, Duchesne J (2003) Ephemeral acid mine drainage at the Montalbion silver mine, north Queensland Australian. J Earth Sci 50:797–809. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0952.2003.01029.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jambor JL, Nordstrom DK, Alpers CN (2000) Metal-sulfate salts from sulfide mineral oxidation. Rev Mineral Geochem 40:303–350. doi:10.2138/rmg.2000.40.6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe JO (1983) Review of water pollution problems and control strategies in the South African Mining Industry. Wat Sci Tech 15:27–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lottermoser BG (2005) Evaporative mineral precipitates from a historical smelting slag dump, Río Tinto, Spain. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie - Abhandlungen: J Mineral Geoche 181:183–190. doi:10.1127/0077-7757/2005/0016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majzlan J, Navrotsky A, McCleskey R, Alpers C (2006) Thermodynamic properties and crystal structure refinement of ferricopiapite, coquimbite, rhomboclase and Fe2(SO4)3(H2O)5. Eur J Mineral 18:175–186. doi:10.1127/0935-1221/2006/0018-0175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden DD (1986) The current limited impact of Witwatersrand gold-mine residues on water pollution in the Vaal River system. J the South African Inst Min and Metall 86:481–504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy TS (2006) The Witwatersrand Supergroup. In: Johnson MR, Anhaeusser CR, Thomas RJ (eds) The Geology of South Africa. Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg/Council for Geoscience, Pretoria, pp 155–186

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy T (2011) The impact of acid mine drainage in South Africa. S Afr J Sci 107:1–7. doi:10.4102/sajs.v107i5/6.712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naicker K, Cukrowska E, McCarthy TS (2003) Acid mine drainage arising from gold mining activity in Johannesburg, South Africa and environs. Environ Pollut 122:29–40. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00281-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom DK (2008) Acid rock drainage and climate change. J Geochem Explor 100:97–104. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.143.4.0699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom DK (2011) Hydrogeochemical processes governing the origin, transport and fate of major and trace elements from mine wastes and mineralized rock to surface waters. Appl Geochem 26:1777–1791. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.06.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelofse S, Hobbs P, Rascher J, Cobbing J (2007) The Pollution and Destruction Threat of Gold Mining Waste on the Witwatersrand: A West Rand Case Study. In: 10th International Symposium on Environmental Issues and Waste management in Energy and Mineral Production (SWEMP, 2007), Bangkok pp 11-13

  • Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A43. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/06/a43. Accessed on 12 January 2015

  • Pretorius DA (1964) The Geology of the Central Rand Goldfield. In: Haughton SH (ed) The Geology of Some Ore Deposits in Southern Africa, vol 1. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., pp 63-108

  • Rosner T, van Schalkwyk A (2000) The environmental impact of gold mine tailings footprints in the Johannesburg region, South Africa. Bull Eng Geol Environ 122:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rull F, Guerrero J, Venegas G, Gázquez F, Medina J (2014) Spectroscopic Raman study of sulphate precipitation sequence in Rio Tinto mining district (SW Spain). Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:6783–6792. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1927-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton M (2008) Use of remote sensing and GIS in a risk assessment of gold and uranium mine residue deposits and identification of vulnerable land use. University of the Witwatersrand, MSc Research Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu H (2006) Determination and geochemical modelling of the dispersal of uranium in gold mine-polluted land on the Witwatersrand. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.

  • Tutu H, McCarthy TS, Cukrowska EM (2008) The chemical characteristics of acid mine drainage with particular reference to sources, distribution and remediation: the Witwatersrand Basin. South Africa as a case study Appl Geochem 23:3666–3684. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.09.002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tutu H, Camden-Smith B, Cukrowska E, Bakatula E, Weiersbye I, Sutton M (2011) Mineral efflorescent crusts as sources of pollution in gold mining environments in the Witwatersrand Basin. International Mine Water Association Proceedings: "Mine Water – Managing the Challenges”, Aachen, Germany. 623-626.

  • Wardencki W, Namiesnik J (2002) Chapter 2. Sampling water and aqueous solutions. In: Pawliszyn J (ed) Sampling and sample preparation for field and laboratory: fundamental and new directions in sample preparation. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, pp 33–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yibas B, Pulles W, Lorentz S, Maiyana B, Nengovhela C (2012) Oxidation process and hydrology of tailings dams from TSFs management- The Witwatersrand experience, South Africa. International Mine Water Association Symposium, Bunbury, Australia, pp 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu C, Anderson G (2002) Environmental applications of geochemical modeling. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the South African National Research Foundation and the US National Academy of Sciences (through the PEER program, Grant AID-OAA-A-11-00012) for funding this research. Furthermore, we wish to thank Dr Charles Cravotta III (US Geological Survey) for his guidance with sourcing and calculating additional data for ferric minerals. The authors also thank the reviewers of this paper for their valuable contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Tutu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grover, B.P.C., Johnson, R.H., Billing, D.G. et al. Mineralogy and geochemistry of efflorescent minerals on mine tailings and their potential impact on water chemistry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 7338–7348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5870-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5870-z

Keywords

Navigation