Abstract
Background, aim, and scope
Large quantities of biosolids (sewage sludge), which are produced from municipal wastewater treatment, are ever-increasing because of the commissioning of new treatment plants and continuous upgrades of the existing facilities. A large proportion of biosolids are currently landfilled. With increasing pressure from regulators and the general public, landfilling of biosolids is being phased out in many countries because of potential secondary pollution caused by leachate and the emission of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Biosolids contain nutrients and energy that can be used beneficially. Significant efforts have been made recently to develop new technologies to manage biosolids and make useful products from them. In this paper, we provide a review of the technologies in biosolids management.
Materials and methods
A survey of literature was conducted.
Results
At present, the most common beneficial use of biosolids is agricultural land application because of inherent fertilizer values found in biosolids. Expansion of land application, however, may be limited in the future because of more stringent regulatory requirements and public concern about food chain contamination in some countries. Perceived as a green energy source, the combustion of biosolids has received renewed interest. Anaerobic digestion is generally a more effective method than incineration for energy recovery, and digested biosolids are suitable for further beneficial use through land application. Although conventional incineration systems for biosolid management generally consume more energy than they produce because of the high moisture content in the biosolids, it is expected that more combustion systems, either monocombustion or cocombustion, will be built to cope with the increasing quantity of biosolids.
Discussion
Under the increasingly popular low-carbon economy policy, biosolids may be recognized as a renewable fuel and be eligible for ‘carbon credits’. Because ash can be used to manufacture construction materials, combustion can provide a complete management for biosolids. A number of advanced thermal conversion technologies (e.g., supercritical water oxidation process and pyrolysis) are under development for biosolids management with a goal to generate useful products, such as higher quality fuels and recovery of phosphorus. With an ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, growing bioenergy crops and forests using biosolids as a fertilizer and soil amendment can not only contribute to the low-carbon economy but also maximize the nutrient and carbon value of the biosolids.
Conclusions
Land application of biosolids achieves a complete reuse of its nutrients and organic carbon at a relatively low cost. Therefore, land application should become a preferred management option where there is available land, the quality of biosolids meet regulatory requirements, and it is socially acceptable. Intensive energy cropping and forest production using biosolids can help us meet the ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, which can eliminate the contamination potential for food sources, a common social concern about land application of biosolids. In recent years, increasing numbers of national and local governments have adopted more stringent regulations toward biosolid management. Under such a political climate, biosolids producers will have to develop multireuse strategies for biosolids to avoid being caught because a single route management practice might be under pressure at a short notice. Conventional incineration systems for biosolids management generally consume more energy than they produce and, although by-products may be used in manufacturing, this process cannot be regarded as a beneficial use of biosolids. However, biosolids are likely to become a source of renewable energy and produce ‘carbon credits’ under the increasingly popular, low-carbon economy policy.
Recommendations and perspectives
To manage biosolids in a sustainable manner, there is a need for further research in the following areas: achieving a higher degree of public understanding and acceptance for the beneficial use of biosolids, developing cost-efficient and effective thermal conversions for direct energy recovery from biosolids, advancing technology for phosphorus recovery, and selecting or breeding crops for efficient biofuel production.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boswell FC (1975) Municipal sewage sludge and selected element application to soil: effect on soil and fescue. J Environ Qual 4:267–272
Bridle TR, Skrypski-Mantele S (2004) Experience and lessons learned from sewage sludge pyrolysis in Australia. Water Sci Technol 49:217–223
Brown SL (2007) ‘Green’ incineration. Biocycle 48(7):21
Brown SL, Henry CL, Chaney R, Compton H, DeVolder PS (2003) Using municipal biosolids in combination with other residuals to restore metal-contaminated mining areas. Plant Soil 249:203–215
Cartmell E, Gostelow P, Riddell-Black D, Simms N, Oakey J, Morris J, Jeffrey P, Howsam P, Pollard SJ (2006) Biosolids—a fuel or a waste? An integrated appraisal of five co-combustion scenarios with policy analysis. Environ Sci Technol 40:649–658
CEC (2000) Working document on sludge (3rd draft). Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General Environment, ENV.E.3/LM, Brussels, 27 April
Chiou I-J, Wang K-S, Chen C-H, Lin Y-T (2006) Lightweight aggregate made from sewage sludge and incinerated ash. Waste Manage 26:1453–1461
Domínguez A, Menéndez JA, Inguanzo M, Pís JJ (2006) Production of bio-fuels by high temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge using conventional and microwave heating. Bioresour Technol 97:1185–1193
Domínguez A, Fernández Y, Fidalgo B, Pís JJ, Menéndez JA (2008) Bio-syngas production with low concentrations of CO2 and CH4 from microwave-induced pyrolysis of wet and dried sewage sludge. Chemosphere 70:397–403
Epstein E (1975) Effect of sewage sludge on some soil physical properties. J Environ Qual 4:139–142
Ferreira C, Ribeiro A, Ottosen L (2003) Possible applications for municipal solid waste fly ash. J Hazard Mater 96:201–216
Folgueras MB, Díaz RM, Xiberta J, Prieto I (2003) Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge. Fuel 82:2051–2055
García-Delgado M, Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Lorenzo LF, Arienzo M, Sánchez-Martín MJ (2007) Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludges from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 382:82–92
Gendebien A, Carlton-Smith C, Izzo M, Hall JE (1999) UK sewage sludge survey—national presentation. R&D Technical Report P165, Environment Agency, Swindon, UK
González M, Mingorance M, Sánchez L, Peña A (2008) Pesticide adsorption on a calcareous soil modified with sewage sludge and quaternary alkyl-ammonium cationic surfactants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 15:8–14
GVRD (2005) Review of alternative technologies for biosolids management. Greater Vancouver Regional District, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, p 33
Haering KC, Daniels WL, Feagley SE (2000) Reclaiming mined lands with biosolids, manures, and papermill sludges. In: Barnhisel RI et al. (eds) Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. Agron Monogr 41:615–644, ASA, SSSA, and CSSA, Madison, WI
Hall JE, Dalimier F (1994) Waste management—sewage sludge: survey of sludge production, treatment, quality and disposal in the EC. EC Ref. No. B4-3040/014156/92, Report No. 3646
Henry CL, Cole DW, Hinckley TM, Harrison RB (1993) The use of municipal and pulp and paper sludges to increase production in forestry. J Sustain For 1(3):41–55
Higgins M, Murthy S (2006) Understanding factors affecting polymer demand for thickening and dewatering. WERF Report 01-CTS-1. IWA, London, UK, pp 110
Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA, Norvell KL (2007) Biosolids impact soil phosphorus accountability, fractionation, and potential environmental risk. J Environ Qual 36:764–772
Johansson K, Perzon M, Fröling M, Mossakowska A, Svanström M (2008) Sewage sludge handling with phosphorus utilization—life cycle assessment of four alternatives. J Clean Prod 16:135–151
Kääntee U, Zevenhoven R, Backman R, Hupa M (2002) Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modeling. Fuel Process Technol 85:293–301
Kim Y, Parker W (2008) A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil. Bioresour Technol 99:1409–1416
Kimberley MO, Wang H, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR, Magesan GN (2004) Economic analysis of growth response from a pine plantation forest applied with biosolids. For Ecol Manage 189:345–351
Kleinman P, Sullivan D, Wolf A, Brandt R, Dou Z, Elliott H, Kovar J, Leytem A, Maguire R, Moore P, Saporito L, Sharpley A, Shober A, Sims T, Toth J, Toor G, Zhang H, Zhang T (2007) Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential. J Environ Qual 36:1357–1367
Kroiss H (2004) What is the potential for utilizing the resources in sludge? Water Sci Technol 49:1–10
Laturnus F, von Arnold K, Grøn C (2007) Organic contaminants from sewage sludge applied to agricultural soils. False alarm regarding possible problems for food safety? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 14(1):53–60
Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144
Lundin M, Olofsson M, Pettersson GJ, Zetterlund H (2004) Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options. Resour Conserv Recycl 41:255–278
Magesan GN, Wang H (2003) Application of municipal and industrial residuals in New Zealand forests: an overview. Aust J Soil Res 41:557–569
Mahmood T, Elliott A (2006) A review of secondary sludge reduction technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Water Res 40:2093–2112
Marrone PA, Hodes M, Smith KA, Tester JW (2004) Salt precipitation and scale control in supercritical water oxidation, part B—commercial/full-scale applications. J Supercrit Fluids 29:289–312
Matteson GC, Jenkins BM (2007) Food and processing residues in California: resource assessment and potential for power generation. Bioresour Technol 98:3098–3105
McLaren MG, Clucas LM, Speir TW, van Schaik AP (2007) Distribution and movement of nutrients and metals in a Pinus radiata forest soil following applications of biosolids. Environ Pollut 147:32–40
Metcalf and Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY
MfE (2002) Waste strategy. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
MfE (2005) Cross-departmental research project ‘Removing the roadblocks to the beneficial reuse of biosolids and treated effluent’. Phase 2: sampling program. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
MfE (2007) Targets in the New Zealand waste strategy—2006 review of progress. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
Morera MT, Echeverria J, Garrido J (2002) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils amended with sewage sludge. Can J Soil Sci 82:433–438
Nishio N, Nakashimada Y (2007) Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes. J Biosci Bioeng 103:105–112
NZWWA (2003) Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand, part 1—guidelines. New Zealand Water and Wastes Association, Wellington
Ojeda G, Alcaniz JM, Ortiz O (2003) Runoff and losses by erosion in soils amended with sewage sludge. Land Degrad Dev 14:563–573
Okuno N, Takahashi S (1997) Full scale application of manufacturing bricks from sewage. Water Sci Technol 36:243–250
Oliver IW, McLaughlin MJ, Merrington G (2005) Temporal trends of total and potentially available element concentrations in sewage biosolids—a comparison of biosolid surveys conducted 18 years apart. Sci Total Environ 337:139–145
Otero M, Gómez X, García AI, Morán A (2007) Effects of sewage sludge blending on the coal combustion—a thermogravimetric assessment. Chemosphere 69:1740–1750
Parker WJ (2005) Application of the ADM1 model to advanced anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 96:1832–1842
Peregrina C, Rudolph V, Lecomte D, Arlabosse P (2008) Immersion frying for the thermal drying of sewage sludge—an economic assessment. J Environ Manage 86:246–261
Pettersson A, Åmand L-E, Steenari B-M (2008) Leaching of ashes from co-combustion of sewage sludge and wood, part I—recovery of phosphorus. Biomass Bioenergy 32:224–235
Roeleveld P, Loeffen P, Temmink H, Klapwijk B (2004) Dutch analysis for P-recovery from municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 49:191–199
Rulkens W (2008) Sewage sludge as a biomass resource for the production of energy—overview and assessment of the various options. Energy Fuels 22:9–15
Schroder JL, Zhang H, Zhou D, Basta N, Raun WR, ME Payton ME, Zazulak A (2008) The effect of long-term annual application of biosolids on soil properties, phosphorus, and metals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:73–82
Sigua GC, Adjei M, Rechcigl J (2005) Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications—forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 12:80–88
Sims JT, Sharpley AN (2005) Phosphorus—agriculture and the environment. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI
Smith SR (1996) Agricultural recycling of sewage sludge and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford
Sommers LE (1977) Chemical composition of sewage sludges and analysis of their potential use as fertilizers. J Environ Qual 6:225–232
Stark K, Plaza E, Hultman B (2006) Phosphorus release from ash, dried sludge and sludge residue from supercritical water oxidation by acid or base. Chemosphere 62:827–832
Stasta P, Boran J, Bebar L, Stehlik P, Oral J (2006) Thermal processing of sewage sludge. Appl Therm Eng 26:1420–1426
Stehouwer R, Day RL, Macneal KE (2006) Nutrient and trace element leaching following mine reclamation with biosolids. J Environ Qual 35:1118–1126
Stehouwer RC, Sutton P, Fowler RK, Dick WA (1995) Minespoil amendment with dry flue gas desulfurization by-products—element solubility and mobility. J Environ Qual 24:165–174
Stendahl K, Jafverstrom S (2003) Phosphate recovery from sewage sludge in combination with supercritical water oxidation. Water Sci Technol 48:185–190
Su J, Wang H, Kimberley MO, Beecroft K, Magesan GN, Hu C (2007) Fractionation and mobility of phosphorus in a sandy forest soil amended with biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 14:529–535
Su J, Wang H, Kimberley MO, Beecroft K, Magesan GN, Hu C (2008) Distribution of heavy metals in a sandy forest soil amended with biosolids. Aust J Soil Res (in press)
Svanström M, Modell M, Tester J (2004) Direct energy recovery from primary and secondary sludges by supercritical water oxidation. Water Sci Technol 49:201–208
Svanström M, Patrick TN, Froling M, Peterson AA, Tester JW (2007) Choosing between green innovative technologies—hydrothermal processing of biowastes. J Adv Oxid Tech 10:177–185
Tay JH, Show KY (1997) Resource recovery of sludge as a building and construction material—a future trend in sludge management. Water Sci Technol 36:259–266
Tian G, Granato TC, Pietz RI, Carlson CR, Abedin Z (2006) Effect of long-term application of biosolids for land reclamation on surface water chemistry. J Environ Qual 35:101–113
USEPA (1990) National sewage sludge survey: availability of information and data, and anticipated impacts on proposed regulations. Fed Regist 55:47210–47283
USEPA (1994) A guide to the biosolids risk assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule. USEPA, Washington, DC
USEPA (2006) Emerging technologies for biosolids management. EPA 832-R-06-005. USEPA, Washington, DC
Wang H, Kimberley MO, Magesan GN, McKinley RB, Lee JR, Lavery JM, Hodgkins PDF, Payn TW, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR, McConchie DL (2006) Mid-rotation effects of biosolids application on tree growth and wood properties in a Pinus radiata plantation. Can J For Res 36:1921–1930
Wang H, Kimberley MO, Schlegelmilch M (2003) Biosolids derived nitrogen mineralization and transformation in forest soils. J Environ Qual 32:1851–1856
Wang H, Magesan GN, Kimberley MO, Payn TW, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR (2004) Environmental and nutritional responses of Pinus radiata plantation to biosolids application. Plant Soil 267:255–262
Wang H, Magesan GN, Clinton PW, Lavery JM (2005) Using natural 15N abundances to trace the fate of waste-derived nitrogen in forest ecosystems—New Zealand case studies. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 41:31–38
Warman PR, Termeer WC (2005) Evaluation of sewage sludge, septic waste and sludge compost applications to corn and forage—yields and N, P and K content of crops and soils. Bioresour Technol 96:955–961
Werther J, Ogada T (1999) Sewage sludge combustion. Progr Energy Combust Sci 25:55–116
Wiebusch B, Seyfried CF (1997) Utilization of sewage sludge ashes in the brick and tile industry. Water Sci Technol 36:251–258
Zabaniotou A, Theofilou C (2008) Green energy at cement kiln in Cyprus—use of sewage sludge as a conventional fuel substitute. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:531–541
Acknowledgment
We wish to thank the New Zealand Foundation for Science Research and Technology for the partial funding support, Dr. J. Wu and the anonymous referees for the constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Lee Young
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Brown, S.L., Magesan, G.N. et al. Technological options for the management of biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 308–317 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5