Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technological options for the management of biosolids

  • AREA 5.2 • BIO-PRODUCTS, BIO-PROCESSING • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Large quantities of biosolids (sewage sludge), which are produced from municipal wastewater treatment, are ever-increasing because of the commissioning of new treatment plants and continuous upgrades of the existing facilities. A large proportion of biosolids are currently landfilled. With increasing pressure from regulators and the general public, landfilling of biosolids is being phased out in many countries because of potential secondary pollution caused by leachate and the emission of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Biosolids contain nutrients and energy that can be used beneficially. Significant efforts have been made recently to develop new technologies to manage biosolids and make useful products from them. In this paper, we provide a review of the technologies in biosolids management.

Materials and methods

A survey of literature was conducted.

Results

At present, the most common beneficial use of biosolids is agricultural land application because of inherent fertilizer values found in biosolids. Expansion of land application, however, may be limited in the future because of more stringent regulatory requirements and public concern about food chain contamination in some countries. Perceived as a green energy source, the combustion of biosolids has received renewed interest. Anaerobic digestion is generally a more effective method than incineration for energy recovery, and digested biosolids are suitable for further beneficial use through land application. Although conventional incineration systems for biosolid management generally consume more energy than they produce because of the high moisture content in the biosolids, it is expected that more combustion systems, either monocombustion or cocombustion, will be built to cope with the increasing quantity of biosolids.

Discussion

Under the increasingly popular low-carbon economy policy, biosolids may be recognized as a renewable fuel and be eligible for ‘carbon credits’. Because ash can be used to manufacture construction materials, combustion can provide a complete management for biosolids. A number of advanced thermal conversion technologies (e.g., supercritical water oxidation process and pyrolysis) are under development for biosolids management with a goal to generate useful products, such as higher quality fuels and recovery of phosphorus. With an ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, growing bioenergy crops and forests using biosolids as a fertilizer and soil amendment can not only contribute to the low-carbon economy but also maximize the nutrient and carbon value of the biosolids.

Conclusions

Land application of biosolids achieves a complete reuse of its nutrients and organic carbon at a relatively low cost. Therefore, land application should become a preferred management option where there is available land, the quality of biosolids meet regulatory requirements, and it is socially acceptable. Intensive energy cropping and forest production using biosolids can help us meet the ever-increasing demand for renewable energy, which can eliminate the contamination potential for food sources, a common social concern about land application of biosolids. In recent years, increasing numbers of national and local governments have adopted more stringent regulations toward biosolid management. Under such a political climate, biosolids producers will have to develop multireuse strategies for biosolids to avoid being caught because a single route management practice might be under pressure at a short notice. Conventional incineration systems for biosolids management generally consume more energy than they produce and, although by-products may be used in manufacturing, this process cannot be regarded as a beneficial use of biosolids. However, biosolids are likely to become a source of renewable energy and produce ‘carbon credits’ under the increasingly popular, low-carbon economy policy.

Recommendations and perspectives

To manage biosolids in a sustainable manner, there is a need for further research in the following areas: achieving a higher degree of public understanding and acceptance for the beneficial use of biosolids, developing cost-efficient and effective thermal conversions for direct energy recovery from biosolids, advancing technology for phosphorus recovery, and selecting or breeding crops for efficient biofuel production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boswell FC (1975) Municipal sewage sludge and selected element application to soil: effect on soil and fescue. J Environ Qual 4:267–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridle TR, Skrypski-Mantele S (2004) Experience and lessons learned from sewage sludge pyrolysis in Australia. Water Sci Technol 49:217–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL (2007) ‘Green’ incineration. Biocycle 48(7):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL, Henry CL, Chaney R, Compton H, DeVolder PS (2003) Using municipal biosolids in combination with other residuals to restore metal-contaminated mining areas. Plant Soil 249:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartmell E, Gostelow P, Riddell-Black D, Simms N, Oakey J, Morris J, Jeffrey P, Howsam P, Pollard SJ (2006) Biosolids—a fuel or a waste? An integrated appraisal of five co-combustion scenarios with policy analysis. Environ Sci Technol 40:649–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000) Working document on sludge (3rd draft). Commission of the European Communities Directorate-General Environment, ENV.E.3/LM, Brussels, 27 April

  • Chiou I-J, Wang K-S, Chen C-H, Lin Y-T (2006) Lightweight aggregate made from sewage sludge and incinerated ash. Waste Manage 26:1453–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez A, Menéndez JA, Inguanzo M, Pís JJ (2006) Production of bio-fuels by high temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge using conventional and microwave heating. Bioresour Technol 97:1185–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez A, Fernández Y, Fidalgo B, Pís JJ, Menéndez JA (2008) Bio-syngas production with low concentrations of CO2 and CH4 from microwave-induced pyrolysis of wet and dried sewage sludge. Chemosphere 70:397–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E (1975) Effect of sewage sludge on some soil physical properties. J Environ Qual 4:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C, Ribeiro A, Ottosen L (2003) Possible applications for municipal solid waste fly ash. J Hazard Mater 96:201–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folgueras MB, Díaz RM, Xiberta J, Prieto I (2003) Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge. Fuel 82:2051–2055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Delgado M, Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Lorenzo LF, Arienzo M, Sánchez-Martín MJ (2007) Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludges from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 382:82–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gendebien A, Carlton-Smith C, Izzo M, Hall JE (1999) UK sewage sludge survey—national presentation. R&D Technical Report P165, Environment Agency, Swindon, UK

  • González M, Mingorance M, Sánchez L, Peña A (2008) Pesticide adsorption on a calcareous soil modified with sewage sludge and quaternary alkyl-ammonium cationic surfactants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 15:8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GVRD (2005) Review of alternative technologies for biosolids management. Greater Vancouver Regional District, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Haering KC, Daniels WL, Feagley SE (2000) Reclaiming mined lands with biosolids, manures, and papermill sludges. In: Barnhisel RI et al. (eds) Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. Agron Monogr 41:615–644, ASA, SSSA, and CSSA, Madison, WI

  • Hall JE, Dalimier F (1994) Waste management—sewage sludge: survey of sludge production, treatment, quality and disposal in the EC. EC Ref. No. B4-3040/014156/92, Report No. 3646

  • Henry CL, Cole DW, Hinckley TM, Harrison RB (1993) The use of municipal and pulp and paper sludges to increase production in forestry. J Sustain For 1(3):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins M, Murthy S (2006) Understanding factors affecting polymer demand for thickening and dewatering. WERF Report 01-CTS-1. IWA, London, UK, pp 110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito JA, Barbarick KA, Norvell KL (2007) Biosolids impact soil phosphorus accountability, fractionation, and potential environmental risk. J Environ Qual 36:764–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson K, Perzon M, Fröling M, Mossakowska A, Svanström M (2008) Sewage sludge handling with phosphorus utilization—life cycle assessment of four alternatives. J Clean Prod 16:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kääntee U, Zevenhoven R, Backman R, Hupa M (2002) Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modeling. Fuel Process Technol 85:293–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Parker W (2008) A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil. Bioresour Technol 99:1409–1416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberley MO, Wang H, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR, Magesan GN (2004) Economic analysis of growth response from a pine plantation forest applied with biosolids. For Ecol Manage 189:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman P, Sullivan D, Wolf A, Brandt R, Dou Z, Elliott H, Kovar J, Leytem A, Maguire R, Moore P, Saporito L, Sharpley A, Shober A, Sims T, Toth J, Toor G, Zhang H, Zhang T (2007) Selection of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manures and biosolids as an indicator of runoff loss potential. J Environ Qual 36:1357–1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroiss H (2004) What is the potential for utilizing the resources in sludge? Water Sci Technol 49:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laturnus F, von Arnold K, Grøn C (2007) Organic contaminants from sewage sludge applied to agricultural soils. False alarm regarding possible problems for food safety? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 14(1):53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M, Olofsson M, Pettersson GJ, Zetterlund H (2004) Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options. Resour Conserv Recycl 41:255–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesan GN, Wang H (2003) Application of municipal and industrial residuals in New Zealand forests: an overview. Aust J Soil Res 41:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood T, Elliott A (2006) A review of secondary sludge reduction technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Water Res 40:2093–2112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marrone PA, Hodes M, Smith KA, Tester JW (2004) Salt precipitation and scale control in supercritical water oxidation, part B—commercial/full-scale applications. J Supercrit Fluids 29:289–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matteson GC, Jenkins BM (2007) Food and processing residues in California: resource assessment and potential for power generation. Bioresour Technol 98:3098–3105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren MG, Clucas LM, Speir TW, van Schaik AP (2007) Distribution and movement of nutrients and metals in a Pinus radiata forest soil following applications of biosolids. Environ Pollut 147:32–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • MfE (2002) Waste strategy. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • MfE (2005) Cross-departmental research project ‘Removing the roadblocks to the beneficial reuse of biosolids and treated effluent’. Phase 2: sampling program. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • MfE (2007) Targets in the New Zealand waste strategy—2006 review of progress. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Morera MT, Echeverria J, Garrido J (2002) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils amended with sewage sludge. Can J Soil Sci 82:433–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishio N, Nakashimada Y (2007) Recent development of anaerobic digestion processes for energy recovery from wastes. J Biosci Bioeng 103:105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NZWWA (2003) Guidelines for the safe application of biosolids to land in New Zealand, part 1—guidelines. New Zealand Water and Wastes Association, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda G, Alcaniz JM, Ortiz O (2003) Runoff and losses by erosion in soils amended with sewage sludge. Land Degrad Dev 14:563–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okuno N, Takahashi S (1997) Full scale application of manufacturing bricks from sewage. Water Sci Technol 36:243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver IW, McLaughlin MJ, Merrington G (2005) Temporal trends of total and potentially available element concentrations in sewage biosolids—a comparison of biosolid surveys conducted 18 years apart. Sci Total Environ 337:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otero M, Gómez X, García AI, Morán A (2007) Effects of sewage sludge blending on the coal combustion—a thermogravimetric assessment. Chemosphere 69:1740–1750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker WJ (2005) Application of the ADM1 model to advanced anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 96:1832–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peregrina C, Rudolph V, Lecomte D, Arlabosse P (2008) Immersion frying for the thermal drying of sewage sludge—an economic assessment. J Environ Manage 86:246–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson A, Åmand L-E, Steenari B-M (2008) Leaching of ashes from co-combustion of sewage sludge and wood, part I—recovery of phosphorus. Biomass Bioenergy 32:224–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roeleveld P, Loeffen P, Temmink H, Klapwijk B (2004) Dutch analysis for P-recovery from municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 49:191–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rulkens W (2008) Sewage sludge as a biomass resource for the production of energy—overview and assessment of the various options. Energy Fuels 22:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder JL, Zhang H, Zhou D, Basta N, Raun WR, ME Payton ME, Zazulak A (2008) The effect of long-term annual application of biosolids on soil properties, phosphorus, and metals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC, Adjei M, Rechcigl J (2005) Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications—forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 12:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims JT, Sharpley AN (2005) Phosphorus—agriculture and the environment. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SR (1996) Agricultural recycling of sewage sludge and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers LE (1977) Chemical composition of sewage sludges and analysis of their potential use as fertilizers. J Environ Qual 6:225–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark K, Plaza E, Hultman B (2006) Phosphorus release from ash, dried sludge and sludge residue from supercritical water oxidation by acid or base. Chemosphere 62:827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stasta P, Boran J, Bebar L, Stehlik P, Oral J (2006) Thermal processing of sewage sludge. Appl Therm Eng 26:1420–1426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stehouwer R, Day RL, Macneal KE (2006) Nutrient and trace element leaching following mine reclamation with biosolids. J Environ Qual 35:1118–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stehouwer RC, Sutton P, Fowler RK, Dick WA (1995) Minespoil amendment with dry flue gas desulfurization by-products—element solubility and mobility. J Environ Qual 24:165–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stendahl K, Jafverstrom S (2003) Phosphate recovery from sewage sludge in combination with supercritical water oxidation. Water Sci Technol 48:185–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su J, Wang H, Kimberley MO, Beecroft K, Magesan GN, Hu C (2007) Fractionation and mobility of phosphorus in a sandy forest soil amended with biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 14:529–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su J, Wang H, Kimberley MO, Beecroft K, Magesan GN, Hu C (2008) Distribution of heavy metals in a sandy forest soil amended with biosolids. Aust J Soil Res (in press)

  • Svanström M, Modell M, Tester J (2004) Direct energy recovery from primary and secondary sludges by supercritical water oxidation. Water Sci Technol 49:201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanström M, Patrick TN, Froling M, Peterson AA, Tester JW (2007) Choosing between green innovative technologies—hydrothermal processing of biowastes. J Adv Oxid Tech 10:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay JH, Show KY (1997) Resource recovery of sludge as a building and construction material—a future trend in sludge management. Water Sci Technol 36:259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G, Granato TC, Pietz RI, Carlson CR, Abedin Z (2006) Effect of long-term application of biosolids for land reclamation on surface water chemistry. J Environ Qual 35:101–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1990) National sewage sludge survey: availability of information and data, and anticipated impacts on proposed regulations. Fed Regist 55:47210–47283

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1994) A guide to the biosolids risk assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule. USEPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2006) Emerging technologies for biosolids management. EPA 832-R-06-005. USEPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Kimberley MO, Magesan GN, McKinley RB, Lee JR, Lavery JM, Hodgkins PDF, Payn TW, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR, McConchie DL (2006) Mid-rotation effects of biosolids application on tree growth and wood properties in a Pinus radiata plantation. Can J For Res 36:1921–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Kimberley MO, Schlegelmilch M (2003) Biosolids derived nitrogen mineralization and transformation in forest soils. J Environ Qual 32:1851–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Magesan GN, Kimberley MO, Payn TW, Wilks PJ, Fisher CR (2004) Environmental and nutritional responses of Pinus radiata plantation to biosolids application. Plant Soil 267:255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Magesan GN, Clinton PW, Lavery JM (2005) Using natural 15N abundances to trace the fate of waste-derived nitrogen in forest ecosystems—New Zealand case studies. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 41:31–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR, Termeer WC (2005) Evaluation of sewage sludge, septic waste and sludge compost applications to corn and forage—yields and N, P and K content of crops and soils. Bioresour Technol 96:955–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werther J, Ogada T (1999) Sewage sludge combustion. Progr Energy Combust Sci 25:55–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebusch B, Seyfried CF (1997) Utilization of sewage sludge ashes in the brick and tile industry. Water Sci Technol 36:251–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabaniotou A, Theofilou C (2008) Green energy at cement kiln in Cyprus—use of sewage sludge as a conventional fuel substitute. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:531–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We wish to thank the New Zealand Foundation for Science Research and Technology for the partial funding support, Dr. J. Wu and the anonymous referees for the constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hailong Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Lee Young

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Brown, S.L., Magesan, G.N. et al. Technological options for the management of biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15, 308–317 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5

Keywords

Navigation