Skip to main content
Log in

Structure–Activity Relationship and Preclinical Evaluation of Carbon-11-Labeled Ammonium Salts as PET–Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Agents

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Due to the limited availability of suitable positron emission tomography (PET) tracers, the majority of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scans is performed using SPECT rather than PET.

Aim

The aim of this study is to design and synthesize carbon-11-labeled ammonium salt derivatives and explore their structure–activity relationship (SAR) and their potential as PET–MPI agents.

Methods and Results

Three carbon-11-labeled ammonium salts were developed. SAR of the labeled compounds were explored vis-à-vis the effects of charge density and lipophilicity on the distribution kinetics in mice. These studies pointed at [11C]4 as the lead compound. Comparative microPET/CT scans in healthy rats, using both [11C]4 and [13 N]–NH3, substantiated the potential of [11C]4 ([11C]-DMDPA). A proof of concept for the potential of radiolabeled ammonium salts as MPI agents has been demonstrated in a newly developed swine model of permanent partial coronary artery occlusion.

Conclusions

SAR studies of 11C-labeled ammonium salts suggest that both lipophilicity and charge density affect the performance of these compounds as MPI probes. In a swine model, the labeled lead successfully visualized the defect regions in the myocardium. The data presented call for the development of fluorine-18 analogues, to increase clinical impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcassa C, Bax JJ, Bengel F, Hesse B, Petersen CL, Reyes E et al (2008) Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a position statement. Eur Heart J 29:557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore SC (2007) Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT. J Nucl Med 48:783–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilovich O, Billauer H, Dotan S, Freedman NM, Bocher M, Mishani E (2011) Novel and simple carbon-11-labeled ammonium salts as PET agents for myocardial perfusion imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 13:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nekolla SG, Saraste A (2011) Novel F-18-labeled PET myocardial perfusion tracers: bench to bedside. Curr Cardiol Rep 13:145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R (2006) Should PET replace SPECT for evaluating CAD? The end of the beginning. J Nucl Cardiol 13:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glover DK, Gropler RJ (2007) Journey to find the ideal PET flow tracer for clinical use: are we there yet? J Nucl Cardiol 14:765–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huisman MC, Higuchi T, Reder S, Nekolla SG, Poethko T, Wester HJ et al (2008) Initial characterization of an 18F-labeled myocardial perfusion tracer. J Nucl Med 49:630–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Madar I, Ravert H, Nelkin B, Abro M, Pomper M, Dannals R et al (2007) Characterization of membrane potential-dependent uptake of the novel PET tracer 18F-fluorobenzyl triphenylphosphonium cation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:2057–2065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Madar I, Ravert HT, Du Y, Hilton J, Volokh L, Dannals RF et al (2006) Characterization of uptake of the new PET imaging compound 18F-fluorobenzyl triphenyl phosphonium in dog myocardium. J Nucl Med 47:1359–1366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall RC, Powers-Risius P, Reutter BW, O’Neil JP, La Belle M, Huesman RH et al (2004) Kinetic analysis of 18F-fluorodihydrorotenone as a deposited myocardial flow tracer: comparison to 201Tl. J Nucl Med 45:1950–1959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu M, Guaraldi M, Kagan M, Mistry M, McDonald J, Bozek J et al (2009) Assessment of 18F-labeled mitochondrial complex I inhibitors as PET myocardial perfusion imaging agents in rats, rabbits, and primates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:63–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu M, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M, Robinson SP (2011) The next generation of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging agents: discovery of flurpiridaz F-18 for detection of coronary disease. Semin Nucl Med 41:305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crouzel C, Långström B, Pike VW, Coenen HH (1987) Recommendations for a practical production of [11C]methyl iodide. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum Appl Radiat Isot 38:601–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nekolla SG, Reder S, Saraste A, Higuchi T, Dzewas G, Preissel A et al (2009) Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model. Circulation 119:2333–2342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mock BH, Mulholland GK, Vavrek MT (1999) Convenient gas phase bromination of [11C]methane and production of [11C]methyl triflate. Nucl Med Biol 26:467–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yalamanchili P, Wexler E, Hayes M, Yu M, Bozek J, Kagan M et al (2007) Mechanism of uptake and retention of F-18 BMS-747158-02 in cardiomyocytes: a novel PET myocardial imaging agent. J Nucl Cardiol 14:782–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crick SJ, Sheppard MN, Ho SY, Gebstein L, Anderson RH (1998) Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. J Anat 193(Pt 1):105–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes HC (1986) Swine in cardiovascular research. Lab Anim Sci 36:348–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherif HM, Saraste A, Weidl E, Weber AW, Higuchi T, Reder S et al (2009) Evaluation of a novel (18)F-labeled positron-emission tomography perfusion tracer for the assessment of myocardial infarct size in rats. Circulation 2:77–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shoup TM, Elmaleh DR, Brownell AL, Zhu A, Guerrero JL, Fischman AJ (2011) Evaluation of (4-[(1)F]Fluorophenyl)triphenylphosphonium ion. A potential myocardial blood flow agent for PET. Mol Imaging Biol 13:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rauch B, Helus F, Grunze M, Braunwell E, Mall G, Hasselbach W et al (1985) Kinetics of 13N-ammonia uptake in myocardial single cells indicating potential limitations in its applicability as a marker of myocardial blood flow. Circulation 71:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Rami Marciano, Sassi Cohen, Tomer Yamin, Daniel Wajnblum, Orit Jacobson-Weiss, Darya Tsvirkun, and Marina Orevi for their technical help and their useful advice.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Mishani.

Additional information

Authors Ohad Ilovich and Galith Abourbeh equally contributed to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilovich, O., Abourbeh, G., Bocher, M. et al. Structure–Activity Relationship and Preclinical Evaluation of Carbon-11-Labeled Ammonium Salts as PET–Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Agents. Mol Imaging Biol 14, 625–636 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-011-0539-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-011-0539-6

Key words

Navigation