Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated use of LC/MS/MS and LC/Q-TOF/MS targeted metabolomics with automated label-free microscopy for quantification of purine metabolites in cultured mammalian cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Purinergic Signalling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purine metabolites have been implicated as clinically relevant biomarkers of worsening or improving Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression. However, the identification of purine molecules as biomarkers in PD has largely been determined using non-targeted metabolomics analysis. The primary goal of this study was to develop an economical targeted metabolomics approach for the routine detection of purine molecules in biological samples. Specifically, this project utilized LC/MS/MS and LC/QTOF/MS to accurately quantify levels of six purine molecules in samples from cultured N2a murine neuroblastoma cells. The targeted metabolomics workflow was integrated with automated label-free digital microscopy, which enabled normalization of purine concentration per unit cell in the absence of fluorescent dyes. The established method offered significantly enhanced selectivity compared to previously published procedures. In addition, this study demonstrates that a simple, quantitative targeted metabolomics approach can be developed to identify and quantify purine metabolites in biological samples. We envision that this method could be broadly applicable to quantification of purine metabolites from other complex biological samples, such as cerebrospinal fluid or blood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

AMP:

Adenosine monophosphate

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DI-ESI-MS:

Direct-infusion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

DL:

Detection limit

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

G6PD:

Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

HRMS:

High-resolution mass spectrometry

ICH:

International Conference on Harmonization

LC/MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

LC/QTOF/MS:

Liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry

L-DOPA:

L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

LLOD:

Lower limit of detection

MRM:

Multiple reaction monitoring

N2a:

Neuro-2a

NADPH:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

NTPDase:

Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

QL:

Quantification limit

QTOF/MS:

Quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry

UPDRS:

Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale

UPLC:

Ultra performance liquid chromatography

UV-vis:

Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy

References

  1. Poewe W, Seppi K, Tanner CM, Halliday GM, Brundin P, Volkmann J, Schrag AE, Lang AE (2017) Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s Disease (2003) The unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 18:738–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamberts JT, Hildebrandt EN, Brundin P (2015) Spreading of α-synuclein in the face of axonal transport deficits in Parkinson’s disease: a speculative synthesis. Neurobiol Dis 77:276–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Sharabi Y (2012) Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of central catecholamine deficiency in Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies. Brain 135:1900–1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Havelund JF, Heegaard NHHH, Færgeman NJKK, Gramsbergen JB (2017) Biomarker research in Parkinson’s disease using metabolite profiling. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

  6. Burté F, Houghton D, Lowes H, Pyle A, Nesbitt S, Yarnall A, Yu-Wai-Man P, Burn DJ, Santibanez-Koref M, Hudson G (2017) Metabolic profiling of Parkinson’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Mov Disord 32:927–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26992

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewitt PA, Li J, Lu M et al (2017) Metabolomic biomarkers as strong correlates of Parkinson disease progression. Neurology 88:862–869. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Loeffler DA, LeWitt PA, Juneau PL et al (1998) Altered guanosine and guanine concentrations in rabbit striatum following increased dopamine turnover. Brain Res Bull 45:297–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ipata PL, Balestri F, Camici M, Tozzi MG (2011) Molecular mechanisms of nucleoside recycling in the brain. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2010.10.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann H, Zebisch M, Sträter N (2012) Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases. Purinergic Signal 8:437–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-012-9309-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Linden JM (1999) Purine release and metabolism. In: Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW, Albers RW (eds) Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular and medical aspects, 6th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 347–362

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burnstock G, Krügel U, Abbracchio MP, Illes P (2011) Purinergic signalling: from normal behaviour to pathological brain function. Prog Neurobiol 95:229–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNEUROBIO.2011.08.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascherio A, LeWitt PA, Xu K et al (2009) Urate as a predictor of the rate of clinical decline in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 66:1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2009.247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwarzschild MA, Schwid SR, Marek K, Watts A, Lang AE, Oakes D, Shoulson I, Ascherio A, Parkinson Study Group PRECEPT Investigators, Hyson C, Gorbold E, Rudolph A, Kieburtz K, Fahn S, Gauger L, Goetz C, Seibyl J, Forrest M, Ondrasik J (2008) Serum urate as a predictor of clinical and radiographic progression in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 65:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.2008.65.6.nct70003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cortese M, Riise T, Engeland A, Ascherio A, Bjørnevik K (2018) Urate and the risk of Parkinson’s disease in men and women. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 52:76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miao V, Oise Coë Ffet-Legal M-F, Brian P, et al (2018) Daptomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces roseosporus: cloning and analysis of the gene cluster and revision of peptide stereochemistry. Sat 27:57. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27757-0

  17. Dickey CA, De Mesquita DD, Morgan D, Pennypacker KR (2004) Induction of memory-associated immediate early genes by nerve growth factor in rat primary cortical neurons and differentiated mouse Neuro2A cells. Neurosci Lett 366:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.04.089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aragon-Martinez OH, Galicia O, Isiordia-Espinoza MA, Martinez-Morales F (2014) A novel method for measuring the ATP-related compounds in human erythrocytes. Tohoku J Exp Med 233:205–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McFarland NR, Burdett T, Desjardins CA et al (2013) Postmortem brain levels of urate and precursors in Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Neurodegener Dis 12:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Drey LL, Graber MC, Bieschke J (2013) Counting unstained, confluent cells by modified bright-field microscopy. Biotechniques 55:28–33. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tremblay RG, Sikorska M, Sandhu JK, Lanthier P, Ribecco-Lutkiewicz M, Bani-Yaghoub M (2010) Differentiation of mouse neuro 2A cells into dopamine neurons. J Neurosci Methods 186:60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gómez-Villafuertes R, Pintor J, Miras-Portugal MT, Gualix J (2014) Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase activity in neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells: changes in expression associated with neuronal differentiation. J Neurochem 131:290–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.12794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lei S, Zavala-Flores L, Garcia-Garcia A, Nandakumar R, Huang Y, Madayiputhiya N, Stanton RC, Dodds ED, Powers R, Franco R (2014) Alterations in energy/redox metabolism induced by mitochondrial and environmental toxins: a specific role for glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase and the pentose phosphate pathway in paraquat toxicity. ACS Chem Biol 9:2032–2048. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb400894a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

LC/MS/MS targeted metabolomics experiments were performed at the Michigan State University Mass Spectrometry and Metabolomics Core Facility headed by Professor Dr. Dan Jones. The authors thank Dr. Anthony Schilmiller and Mrs. Lijun Chen for their help in conducting mass spectrometry analysis.

Funding

This study was funded by a Ferris State University Exceptional Merit Grant to S.E.N. and an American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy New Investigator Award to J.T.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to all aspects of experimentation and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer T. Lamberts.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Eric Nybo declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Jennifer T. Lamberts declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 37293 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nybo, S.E., Lamberts, J.T. Integrated use of LC/MS/MS and LC/Q-TOF/MS targeted metabolomics with automated label-free microscopy for quantification of purine metabolites in cultured mammalian cells. Purinergic Signalling 15, 17–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-018-9643-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-018-9643-2

Keywords

Navigation