Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the use of leaf and cambium tissue in a single genetic study of tropical trees

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a useful molecular tool for studying species with little available genetic information; however, since universal primers are used contaminant DNA from non-target organisms may also be amplified. Cambium tissue may contain fewer biotic contaminants or plant defense chemicals, than the more commonly used leaf tissue, and therefore be more suitable for use as a source of DNA when using universal primers. On the other hand, cambium tissue can be difficult to identify, yields low DNA and requires the bark of the tree to be damaged, thereby increasing the risk of introducing disease. We show that within two tropical tree species, there are few differences between AFLP profiles obtained from either cambium or leaf tissue from the same tree. We studied 50 Brosimum alicastrum individuals at 119 AFLP loci and 40 Swietenia macrophylla individuals at 112 AFLP loci. The matrix of Sørensen similarity indices between individual AFLP profiles for cambium samples was strongly correlated to the matrix for leaf samples in each species (Mantel test; B. alicastrum r = 0.815, P < 0.001; S. macrophylla r = 0.895, P < 0.001). The phylogenetic relationship between the trees studied did not differ dependent on tissue type used and therefore shows that both tissues can be used within a single study without introducing substantial error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blears MJ, De Grandis SA, Lee H, Trevors JT (1998) Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP): a review of the procedure and its applications. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 21:99–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chase MW, Hills HH (1991) Silica gel: an ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxonomy 40:215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier D, Hardy OJ, Caron H, Clampi AY, Degen B, Kanashiro M, Schoen DJ (2007) Low inbreeding and high pollen dispersal distances in populations of two Amazonian forest tree species. Biotropica 39:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert N, Cavers S, Bandou E, Caron H, Gheysen G, Lowe AJ (2005) Sampling tissue for DNA analysis of trees: trunk cambium as an alternative to canopy leaves. Silvae Genetica 54:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Donini P, Elias ML, Bougourd SM, Koebner RMD (1997) AFLP fingerprinting reveals pattern differences between template DNA extracted from different plant organs. Genome 40:521–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JT (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull, Botanical Soc Am 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Duminil J, Caron H, Scotti I, Cazal SO, Petit RJ (2006) Blind population genetics survey of tropical rainforest trees. Mol Ecol 15:3505–3513. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03040.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fay MF, Lledó MD, Kornblum MM, Crespo MB (1999) From the waters of Babylon? Populus euphratica in Spain is clonal and probably introduced. Biodivers Conserv 8:769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edin 52:399–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167:353–375. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb FE (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson TR, Brunsfeld SJ, Finegan B, Waits LP (2008) Pollen dispersal and genetic structure of the tropical tree Dipteryx panamensis in a fragmented Costa Rican landscape. Mol Ecol 17:2060–2073. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03726.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, Van de Wiel C, Bredemeijer G, Vosman B, Matthes M, Daly A et al (1997) Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3:381–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Kumar S (1999) Rapid isolation of DNA from dry and fresh samples of plants producing large amounts of secondary metabolites and essential oils. Plant Mol Biol Rep 17:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Ecological resemblance. Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LLR (1999) AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol 14:389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li H (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce RB (1996) Antimicrobial defences in the wood of living trees. New Phytol 132:203–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD (2011) PASSaGE: Pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2:229–232. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00081.x

  • Saar DE, Polans NO, Sørensen PD, Duvall MR (2001) Angiosperm DNA contamination by endophytic fungi: detection and methods of avoidance. Plant Mol Biol Report 19:249–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van De Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M et al (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson T, Wetten A, Prychid C, Fay MF (2003) Suitability of cryopreservation for the long-term storage of rare and endangered plant species: a case history for Cosmos atrosanguineus. Annals of Botany 91:65–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zytynska SE, Fay MF, Penny D, Preziosi RF (2011) Genetic variation in a tropical tree species influences the associated epiphytic plant and invertebrate communities in a complex forest ecosystem. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:1329–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Waldo Etherington and Mr Tec for tree climbing. We dedicate this work to the late Nicodemus ‘Chapal’ Bol from Las Cuevas Research Station, and thank Isidro Bol for tree identification and leaf collection. We thank Robyn Cowan for molecular assistance. We also thank Jennifer Rowntree and two anonymous referees for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council PhD studentship to S.E.Z.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon E. Zytynska.

Additional information

Communicated by S. González-Martínez

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

DNA purity from leaf and cambium samples (DOC 28 kb)

Fig. 4

DNA (microgram) obtained from 1 g of dried tissue. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error. C cambium, L leaf, BA Brosimum alicastrum, SM Swietenia macrophylla (JPEG 1868 kb)

High Resolution Image (EPS 732 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zytynska, S.E., Fay, M.F. & Preziosi, R.F. Comparing the use of leaf and cambium tissue in a single genetic study of tropical trees. Tree Genetics & Genomes 8, 431–437 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0453-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0453-8

Keywords

Navigation