Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility, Values, and Cooperation

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lately, some questions relating to Corporate social responsibility (CSR) have become relevant. The European Commission defines CSR as the enterprises’ contribution to sustainable development. In the field of cooperation, there are numerous examples of enterprises very closely engaged in sustainable development that apply very strict ethical codes to their regular operations. This work tries to think about: (1) the necessity of taking upon, again, the moral teachings of some fathers of economics as Adam Smith or Robert Owen, most of which were scorned since the triumph of utilitarianism and rationalism; (2) the slide of society through post-modern values; and (3) the role of cooperative principles and values in the new cultural environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The relationship between cultural changes, change in values, and its economic consequences is studied in Carrasco (2005). The change in values has been studied by R. Inglehart since 1971. See Inglehart’s literature and World Values Survey at http://www.worldvaluesurvey.com.

References

  • Bestratén, M., & Pujol, L. (2004). La responsabilidad social de las empresas (I): conceptos generales. Documentación NTP, N. 643. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos sociales. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo. http://www.mtas.es.

  • Cabrillo, F. (1991). Dos reflexiones sobre la ética, la economía y el derecho. ICE, Monográfico sobre Ética y Economía, 691, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, I. (2005). Ética, cultura y economía. ICE, 823, 189–198 (junio).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowe, R. (2004). Risk returns and responsibility. London: Association of British Insurers.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Cuesta, M., & Valor, C. (2003). Responsabilidad social de la empresa. Concepto, medición y desarrollo en España. Boletín ICE Económico, 2755, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee – Promoting core labour standards and improving governance in the context globalisation. http://www.europa.eu.int (COM (2001) 416 final – Not published in the Official Journal).

  • European Commission (2002). Communication from the Commission of 26 June 2002 – The European social dialogue, a force for innovation and change. http://www.europa.eu.int (COM (2002) 341 final – Not published in the Official Journal).

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September. http://www-rohan.sda.edu.

  • Garz, H., & Volk, C. (2003). Inside RSI. Update ‘More Gain than Pain’ & a fresh look at new index structures. http://www.sustainability-indexes.com.

  • Garz, H., Volk, C., & Gilles, M. (2002). More Gain than Pain. SRI: Sustainability pays off. http://www.sustainability-indexes.com.

  • Gordon, P. (1993). Robert Owen (1771–1858). Perspectivas: Revista trimestral de educación comparada. (UNESCO), XXIV(1–2), 279–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S. B, & Waddock, S. (2000). Beyond ‘built to last’: An evaluation of stakeholder relationships in ‘built-to-last’ Companies. Business and Society Review, 105(4), 393–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2004). Report from the ILO World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalisation “A fair globalisation – creating opportunities for all” of 24 February 2004. http://www.ilo.org.

  • Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalisation and Postmodern values. Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Exploring the unknown: Predicting the responses of publics not yet surveyed. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M. (2000). Corporate Social Performance: Developing Effective Strategies. Centre for Corporate Change. http://www.ccc.agsm.edu.au.

  • Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5(2), 4–16, Septiembre.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1989). Sobre ética y economía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1982). The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Vol. V. Lectures on Jurisprudence– report dated 1766. In R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael y P. G. Stein (Eds.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Edición online bajo licencia de Oxford University Press. http://www.oll.libertyfund.org.

  • Thurow, L. C. (1999). Green growth is no contradiction. Newsweek Japan. In http://www.lthurow.com.

  • Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2005). Liberalism, postmaterialism, and the growth of freedom: The human development perspective. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inmaculada Carrasco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrasco, I. Corporate Social Responsibility, Values, and Cooperation. Int Adv Econ Res 13, 454–460 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9110-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9110-2

Keywords

JEL

Navigation