Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring differential traits of lipid-producing stages of the wild type and morphologically engineered strain of Aspergillus oryzae by comparative kinetic modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative profilings of cell growth and lipid production in the morphologically engineered strain (Δags1) and the wild type (WT) of Aspergillus oryzae BCC7051 were implemented. Using various nitrogen sources, a discrimination in cell morphology between the two strains was found, of which the Δags1 culture exhibited mycelial growth as small pellets in contrast to the WT. Of them, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate were optimal for lipid production of the WT and Δags1 strains, respectively, which the highest lipid concentrations of 7.2 and 7.9 g L−1 were obtained in the respective cultures. The mathematical models of the growth kinetics and lipid phenotypes of both fungal strains were developed, enabling to distinguish three lipid-producing stages, including low lipid-producing, lipid accumulation, and lipid turnover stages. The model validation showed good performances in all nitrogen sources tested for the WT, but only NaNO3 and mixed yeast extract/NH4Cl were fitted well for the Δags1. The difference in the period of lipid-producing stages between the WT and Δags1 indicated the metabolic alterations of A. oryzae by the defect of a gene involved in the cell wall biosynthesis, which exhibited benefits for bioprocessing practices in addition to the high productivities of biomass and lipid. These findings would further permit the manipulation in the metabolic hub of the fungal production platform for other industrial purposes.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

C cal :

Calculated value derived from the model (g L1)

C exp :

Experimental value (g L1)

\(\overline{C} _{{{\text{exp}}}}\) :

Average value of experimental set (g L1)

C P :

Lipid concentration (g L1)

C S :

Glucose concentration (g L1)

C X :

Biomass concentration or dry cell weight (DCW) (g L1)

C Xf :

Lipid-free biomass concentration (g L1)

C Xm :

Maximum biomass concentration (g L1)

k d :

Specific rate of lipid turnover (g g1 day1)

m S :

Biomass maintenance coefficient from glucose (g g1 day1)

n :

Degree of lipid depletion

q P :

Specific rate of lipid production (g g1 day1)

q S :

Specific rate of glucose consumption (g g1 day1)

Q L :

Volumetric rate of lipid reduction (g L1 day1)

Q P :

Volumetric rate of lipid production (g L1 day1)

Q S :

Volumetric rate of glucose consumption (g L1 day1)

Q X :

Volumetric rate of biomass production (g L1 day1)

Q Xf :

Volumetric rate of lipid-free biomass production (g L1 day1)

R 2 :

Determination coefficient

t :

Time (d)

Y P / S :

Lipid yield on glucose (g g1)

Y X / S :

Biomass yield on glucose (g g1)

Y Xf / P :

Lipid-free biomass yield on lipid (g g1)

Y Xf / S :

Lipid-free biomass yield on glucose (g g1)

α:

Growth-associated product coefficient (g g1)

Β:

Non-growth-associated product coefficient (g g1 day1)

μ :

Specific growth rate (day1)

μ Xf :

Specific rate of lipid-free biomass production (day1)

μ max :

Maximum specific growth rate (day1)

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the Targeted Research Grant of Functional Ingredients and Food Innovation, National Science and Technology Development Agency, for supporting this research work (Project No. P19-52263). We would like to thank Mr. Podsawee Limsuwannarot for language proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SW designed and carried out experiments, analyzed data, developed the mathematical models and wrote the manuscript. BK and SJ assisted the analysis of metabolites and cell morphology. KL conceived and designed the research project, interpreted the results, revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kobkul Laoteng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 89 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wannawilai, S., Jeennor, S., Khongto, B. et al. Exploring differential traits of lipid-producing stages of the wild type and morphologically engineered strain of Aspergillus oryzae by comparative kinetic modeling. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 36, 183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02959-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02959-3

Keywords

Navigation