Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes to The Productivity of Water Companies: Comparison of Fully Private and Concessionary Water Companies

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The water industry encompasses a wide variety of water companies operating with different production technologies. This study evaluated and compared changes to the productivity of several fully private water companies (FPWCs) and concessionary water companies (CWCs). Specifically, the cost Malmquist productivity index was estimated by integrating inputs, outputs and environmental variables. A non-parametric approach was used by applying data envelopment analysis. This approach allowed us to quantify the parameters driving changes to productivity as cost efficiency change (technical and allocative efficiency), cost scale efficiency and cost technical change (technical change and input price effect). Through breaking down the cost Malmquist productivity index, relevant information for supporting decision making process by water companies is possible. To further evaluate the impact of water company heterogeneity on productivity change, the changes (convergence versus divergence) to productivity between group and meta-frontiers was estimated. The approach was applied empirically on a sample of 22 water companies in Chile during 2010–2017. The results showed that the productivity of both FPWCs and CWCs improved over time, with FPWCs performing better compared to CWCs. The main drivers of productivity growth for both types of water companies were scale efficiency, technical efficiency and input price effect. Thus, water companies in Chile could improve productivity by moving to a cost-efficient allocation of their resources. The rate of productivity convergence was higher for CWCs compared to FPWCs. The approaches developed in this study provide information that could be used by water managers to better understand what drives productivity and, thus, delineate strategies to improve performance over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due they were developed from primary sources of data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Interested readers can consult the SISS website at: www.siss.gob.cl

References

  • Battese GE, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ (2004) A meta-frontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Product Analysis 21:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg S, Marques R (2011) Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey. Water Policy, 13 (5), 591–606. Bogetoft, P., Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer Science & Business Media

  • Cetrulo TB, Marques RC, Malheiros TF (2019) An analytical review of the efficiency of water and sanitation utilities in developing countries. Water Research161, pp. 372-380

  • Cetrulo TB, Ferreira DF, Marques RC, Malheiros TF (2020) Water utilities performance analysis in developing countries: On an adequate model for universal access. J Environ Manag 268, 110662

  • Cho TY (2018) Cost metafrontier approach for measuring the Malmquist productivity index: An example of bank groups formed after the financial reform in Taiwan. Pacific Econ Rev 1–20

  • Coelli T, Gautier A, Perelman S, Saplacan-Pop R (2013) Estimating the cost of improving quality in electric distribution: a parametric distance function approach. Energy Policy 53:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correira T, Marques RC (2011) Performance of Portuguese water utilities: how do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency? Water Policy 13:343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte K, Marques RC (2009) Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector. Intern Transact Operation Res 16(2):257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbetta F, Petraglia C (2011) Drivers of Regional Efficiency Differentials in Italy: Technical Inefficiency or Allocative Distortions? Growth Change 42(3):351–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh KH, See KF (2021) Twenty years of water utility benchmarking: A bibliometric analysis of emerging interest in water research and collaboration. J Clean Prod 284, 124711

  • Hayami Y (1969) Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(3):564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami Y, Ruttan VW (1970) Agricultural productivity differences among countries. Am Econ Rev 895–911

  • Higuerey A, Trujillo L, González MM (2017) Has efficiency improved after the decentralization in the water industry in Venezuela? Util Policy 49:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CJ, Huang TH, Liu NH (2014) A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework. J Product Analysis 42:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang MY, Juo JC, Fu TT (2015) Metafrontier cost Malmquist productivity index: An application to Taiwanese and Chinese commercial banks. J Product Analysis 44:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Phillips MA (2017) The Influence of the Regulatory Environment on Chinese Urban Water Utilities. Water Resour Manage 31:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniadakis N, Thanassoulis E (2004) A cost Malmquist productivity index. Euro J Operation Res 154:396–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques RC (2011) Regulation of Water and Wastewater Services: An International Comparison. IWA Publishing, London (United Kingdom)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques RC, Berg S, Yane S (2014) Nonparametric benchmarking of Japanese water utilities: Institutional and environmental factors affecting efficiency. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(5):562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellah T, Ben Amor T (2016) Performance of the Tunisian Water Utility: An input distance function approach. Util Policy 38:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Maziotis A (2019) Cost Efficiency of English and Welsh Water Companies: a Meta-Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Water Resour Manag 33:3041–3055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Maziotis A, Sala-Garrido R (2017) Assessing the productivity change of water companies in England and Wales: a dynamic metafrontier approach. J Environ Manag 197:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2016) Performance of fully private and concessionary water and sewerage companies: a metafrontier approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:11620–11629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell CJ, Rao P, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Emp Econ 34:231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano G, Guerrini A, Marques RC (2017) European Water Utility Management: Promoting Efficiency, Innovation and Knowledge in the Water Industry. Water Resour Manage 31:2349–2353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Mocholi-Arche M (2019) Comparing changes in productivity among private water companies integrating quality of service: A metafrontier approach. J Clean Prod 216:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See KF (2015) Exploring and analysing sources of technical efficiency in water supply services: Some evidence from Southeast Asian public water utilities. Water Resour Econ 9:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Varela M, García-Valiñas M, González-Gómez F, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2017) Ownership and performance in water services revisited: does private management really outperform public? Water Resour Manag 31(8):2355–2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhang H, Zhang W (2013) A Malmquist CO2 emission performance index based on a metafrontier approach. Math Com Model 58(5–6):1068–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica Y Ambiental, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avda. Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Alexandros Maziotis & Maria Molinos-Senante

  2. Department of Business, New York College, Av. Vasilissis Amalias 38, 105 58, Athens, Greece

    Alexandros Maziotis

  3. Departamento de Matemáticas Para La Economía Y La Empresa, Universidad de Valencia, Avd. Tarongers S/N5, Valencia, Spain

    Ramon Sala-Garrido & Manuel Mocholi-Arce

  4. Centro de Investigación Para la Gestión Integrada Del Riesgo de Desastres (CIGIDEN), ANID/FONDAP/15110017, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Maria Molinos-Senante

Authors
  1. Alexandros Maziotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramon Sala-Garrido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manuel Mocholi-Arce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Molinos-Senante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AM: Conceptualization; data curation; validation; writing-original draft; methodology; software.

RSG: Methodology; software; writing-review & editing.

MMA: Methodology; software; writing-review & editing.

MMS: Project administration; resources; writing-review & editing; Formal analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Molinos-Senante.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This manuscript has been developed in compliance with Ethical Standards.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 50 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maziotis, A., Sala-Garrido, R., Mocholi-Arce, M. et al. Changes to The Productivity of Water Companies: Comparison of Fully Private and Concessionary Water Companies. Water Resour Manage 35, 3355–3371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02897-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02897-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation