Skip to main content
Log in

The Pros and Cons of Encouraging Shallow Groundwater Use through Controlled Drainage in a Salt-Impacted Irrigation Area

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Encouraging shallow groundwater use through water table management or controlled drainage in irrigated areas can relief crop water stress under water shortage condition. But substituting fresh irrigation water with saline groundwater may speed up salinity buildup in the crop root zone, and consequently increase water use for salt leaching. With a proposed analytical model, this paper presents a case study demonstrating the effect of encouraging shallow groundwater use through controlled drainage on salt and water management in a semi-arid irrigation area in northwestern China. Based on the average rainfall condition, the model assumes that salt accumulates in the crop root zone due to irrigation and shallow groundwater use; till the average soil salinity reaches the crop tolerance level, leaching irrigation is performed and the drainage outlet is lowered to discharge the salt-laden leaching water. For the relatively salt tolerant crop–cotton in the study area, the predicted leaching cycle was as long as 751 days using the fresh water (with salinity of 0.5 g/L) irrigation only; it was shortened to 268 days when the water table depth was controlled at 2 m and 23% of the crop water requirement was contributed from the saline groundwater (with salinity of 4.43 g/L). The predicted leaching cycle was 140 days when the water table depth was controlled at 1.5 m and groundwater contribution was 41% of the crop water requirement; it was shortened to 119 days when the water table depth was controlled at 1.2 m and the groundwater contribution was 67% of the crop water requirements. So the benefit from encouraged shallow groundwater use through controlled drainage is obtained at the expense of shortened leaching cycle; but the shallow groundwater use by crops consists of a significant portion of crop water requirements, and the leaching cycle remains long enough to provide a time window for scheduled leaching in the off season of irrigation. Weighing the pros and cons of the encouraged shallow groundwater use may help plan irrigation and drainage practices to achieve higher water use efficiency in saline agricultural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar F, Tischbein B, Awan UK (2013) Optimizing deficit irrigation scheduling under shallow groundwater conditions in lower reaches of Amu Darya River Basin. Water Resour Manag 27:3165–3178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askri B, Ahmed AT, Abichou T (2014) Bouhlila R (2014) Effects of shallow water table, salinity and frequency of irrigation water on the date palm water use. J Hydrol 513:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan UK, Ibrakhimov M, Tischbein B, Kamalov P, Martius C, Lamers JPA (2011) Improving irrigation water operation in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya River—current status and suggestions. Irrig Drain 60:600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars JE, Christen EW, Soppe RW, Meyer WS (2006a) The resource potential of in-situ shallow groundwater use in irrigated agriculture: a review. Irrig Sci 24(3):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars JE, Christen EW, Hornbuckle JW (2006b) Controlled drainage for improved water management in arid regions irrigated agriculture. Agric Water Manag 86(1–2):128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars JE, Shouse P, Lesch SM (2009) In situ use of groundwater by alfalfa. Agric Water Manag 96(11):1579–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1985) FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29: Water Quality for Agriculture. FAO, Rome, pp 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YM, Guo GS, Wang GX, Kang SZ (1995) The ET and irrigation of main crops in China. Water Resources and Electric-Power Publishing House, Beijing, pp 232–249 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote CM, Bristow KL, Ross PJ (2000) Increasing the efficiency of solute leaching: impacts of flow interruption with drainage of “preferential flow paths”. J Contam Hydrol 43(2000):191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucci G, Lacolla G, Mastro MA, Caranfa G (2016) Leaching effect of rainfall on soil under four-year saline water irrigation. Soil Water Res 11(3):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans RO, Skaggs RW, Gilliam JW (1995) Controlled versus conventional drainage effects on water quality. J Irrig Drain Eng 121(4):271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JW, Skaggs RW, Weed SB (1979) Drainage control to diminish nitrate loss from agricultural fields. J Environ Qual 8(1):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Z, Luo W, Xie J, Pan Y, Chen Y, Tang S, Liu W (2011) Salinity dynamics of wetland ditches receiving drainage from irrigated agricultural land in arid and semi-arid regions. Agric Water Manag 100(2011):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimov AK, Simunek J, Hanjra MA, Avliyakulov M, Forkutsa I (2014) Effects of the shallow water table on water use of winter wheat and ecosystem health: Implications for unlocking the potential of groundwater in the Fergana Valley (Central Asia). Agric Water Manag 131(2014):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei T, Xiao J, Li G, Mao J, Wang J, Liu Z, Zhang J (2003) Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on water use efficiency and quality of watermelons. Water Resour Manag 17:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey J (1993) Relationship between salinity and efficient water use. Irrig Sci 14:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Hoffman GJ, Hopmans JW, Grattan SR, Suarez D, Corwin DL, Oster JD, Wu L, Amrhein C (2011) Evaluation of soil salinity leaching requirement guidelines. Agric Water Manag 98(4):502–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manguerra HB, Garcia LA (1997) Field strategy for agricultural drainage and water-quality management. J Irrig Drain Eng 123(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namken LN, Bartholic JF, Runkles JR (1969) Water use by cotton from low and moderately saline static water tables. Agron J 61:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1974) Drainage for salinity control. In Van Schilfgaarde J (ed) Drainage and Agriculture. Agron Monogr 17. ASA, Madison, p 433–461

  • SDWR (Shaanxi Department of Water Resources) (1992) Crop water requirements and regional irrigation scheduling. Water Resources and Electric-Power Publishing House. Beijing, China (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah SHH, Vervoort RW, Suweis S, Guswa AJ, Rinaldo A, van der Zee SEATM (2011) Stochastic modeling of salt accumulation in the root zone due to capillary flux from brackish groundwater. Water Resour Res 47:W09506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesstrom I, Joel A, Messing I (2014) Controlled drainage and subirrigation - A water management option to reduce non-point source pollution from agricultural land. Agric Ecosyst Environ 198:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51279159), and the Priority Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Luo, W., Jia, Z. et al. The Pros and Cons of Encouraging Shallow Groundwater Use through Controlled Drainage in a Salt-Impacted Irrigation Area. Water Resour Manage 32, 2475–2487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1940-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1940-6

Keywords

Navigation