Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a Two-Stage SVM and Spatial Statistics Methods for Modeling Monthly River Suspended Sediment Load

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is aimed on successful modeling of Ajichay River Suspended Sediment Load (SSL) which is significant object in watershed planning and management. Therefore, a two-stage modeling strategy was proposed in order to handle spatio-temporal variation of SSL. At temporal stage, Support Vector Machine (SVM) was utilized for three stations located on the Ajichay River to find the non-linear relationship of SSL in time domain. Different input sets were examined for the SVM via sensitivity analysis. Results of temporal modeling stage were used in spatial modeling. In spatial modeling stage, firstly semi-variogram of monthly SSL data was calculated and then theoretical semi-variogram model was fitted to the empirical variogram. It was found that Gaussian model is the best fitted model for the study case. The obtained results of semi-variogram were imported into Geostatistic tool for spatial estimation of SSL in sites where there is not any measurement. Results of temporal modeling stage demonstrated that input data as combination of SSL and discharges at 1 month and 12 monthes ago employing RBF based SVM could lead to the best performance for each station. Spatial modeling performance was improved relatively using streamflow dataset. The obtained results show that the hybrid of SVM and Spatial statistics methods could predict and simulated SSL appropriately by enjoying unique features of both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afan HA, El-Shafie A, Yaseen ZM, Hameed MM, Mohtar WHMW, Hussain A (2015) ANN based sediment prediction model utilizing different input scenarios. Water Resour Manag 29(4):1231–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ch S, Anand N, Panigrahi BK (2013) Streamflow forecasting by SVM with quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Neurocomputing 101:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobaner M, Unal B, Kisi O (2009) Suspended sediment concentration estimation by an adaptive neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches using hydro-meteorological data. J Hydrol 367(1–2):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1991) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vente J, Poesen J, Bazzoffi P, Van Rompaey A, Verstraeten G (2006) Predicting catchment sediment yield in Mediterranean environments: the importance of sediment sources and connectivity in Italian drainage basins. Earth Surf Processes Land 31:1017–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Velickov S, Solomatine DP, Abbott MB (2001) Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. J Comput Civ Eng 15:208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol 228:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Zhou J, Qin H (2011) Monthly streamflow forecasting based on improved support vector machine model. Expert Syst Appl 38:13073–13081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakaei E, Moghddamnia A, Ahmadi A (2013) Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Hydrol 478:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Haktanir T, Ardiclioglu M, Ozturk O, Yalcin E, Uludag S (2008) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy computing technique for suspended sediment estimation. Adv Eng Softw 40(6):438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle RA, and Simon A (2000) Evaluation of Sediment Transport Data for Clean Sediment TMDLs. National Sedimentation Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service Oxford, Mississippi. Evaluation of Sediment Transport Data. NSL Report No. 17

  • Kumar M, Kar IN (2002) Non-linear HVAC computations using least square support vector machines. Energ Convers Manage 50:1411–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Yang W, Yu Z, Lung I, Gharabaghi B (2015) Estimating sediment yield from upland and channel erosion at a watershed scale using SWAT. Water Resour Manag 29(5):1399–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly S, Charles C, Degré A (2011) Geostatistical interpolation of daily rainfall at catchment scale: the use of several variogram models in the ourthe and ambleve catchments. Belgium. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:2259–2274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol Geology 58:1246–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra D, Oommen T, Agrawal A (2009) Application and analysis of support vector machine based simulation for runoff and sediment yield. Biosyst Eng 103(4):527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin L, Gaume E, Obled C (2009) Uncertainties on mean areal precipitation: assessment and impact on streamflow simulations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori R, Abdoli MA, Ghasrodashti AA, Jalili Ghazizade M (2009) Prediction of municipal solid waste generation with combination of support vector machine and principal component analysis: a case study of Mashhad. Environ Prog Sustain 28:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori R, Karbassi AR, Moghaddamnia A (2011) Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, gamma test and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction. J Hydrol 401:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Andalib G (2015) Daily and monthly suspended sediment load predictions using wavelet based artificial intelligence approaches. J Mt Sci 12(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani V, Ejlali RG, Alami MT (2010) Spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting in coastal aquifers by hybrid artificial neural network-geostatisics model: a case study. Environ Eng Sci 28(3):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partal T, Cigizoglu HK (2008) Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data using wavelet-neural networks. J Hydrol 358:317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouhani S, Hall TJ (1989) Space-time kriging of groundwater data. In: Armstrong M (ed) Geostatistics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol 2, pp. 639–651

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Hassanzadeh Y, Keynejad MA, Alami MT, Nourani V, Mouaze D (2011) Studying of flow model and bed load transport in a coarse bed river: case study – Aland river, Iran. J Hydroinform 13(4):850–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Mehrabani FV, Shiri J (2014a) Modeling River total bed Material Load Discharge Using Artificial Intelligence Approaches (Based on Conceptual Inputs). J Hydrol 514:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Mouaze D, Shiri J (2014b) Evaluation of genetic programming -based models for simulating friction factor in alluvial channels. J Hydrol 517:1154–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Li Y, Wang Q (2012) A novel support vector regression model to estimate the phycocyanin concentration in turbid inland waters from hyperspectral reflectance. Hydrobiologia 680:199–217. doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0918-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed KH, Goodrich DC, Myers DE, Sorooshian S (2003) Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff. J Hydrol 271:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G, Ozdemir S, Singh VP (2003) Fuzzy logic algorithm for runoff-induced sediment transport from bare soil surfaces. Adv Water Resour 26(12):1249–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000) The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters. A Summary of the National Water Quality Inventory: 1998 Report to Congress, Office of Water. 841-S-00-001 Washington DC

  • Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V, Cortes C (1995) Support vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Xu D, Chau K, Chen S (2013) Improved annual rainfall-runoff forecasting using PSO-SVM model based on EEMD. J Hydroinform 15:1377–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists, Statistics in Practice Series. Wiley, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinsona SN, Dougallb C, Kinsey-Hendersonc AE, Searled RD, Ellisb RJ, Bartleyd R (2014) Development of a time-stepping sediment budget model for assessing land use impacts in large river basins. Sci Total Environ 468-469:1210–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YM, Lu XX, Zhou Y (2007) Suspended sediment flux modeling with artificial neural network: an example of the longchuanjiang river in the upper Yangtze catchment, China. Geomorphology 84:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by the University of Tabriz and East Azerbaijan regional water company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoumars Roushangar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nourani, V., Alizadeh, F. & Roushangar, K. Evaluation of a Two-Stage SVM and Spatial Statistics Methods for Modeling Monthly River Suspended Sediment Load. Water Resour Manage 30, 393–407 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1168-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1168-7

Keywords

Navigation