Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variability of Intra-event Statistics for Multiple Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Urban Stormwater

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pathogens in surface waters continue to be a worldwide concern. The potential presence of pathogens is often identified through the use of fecal indicator bacteria such as fecal coliform, E. coli, and enterococci, each of which are still utilized worldwide depending on local regulations. Urban stormwater runoff has been shown to convey fecal indicator bacteria to surface waters; however, the fate and transport dynamics of these microbes in urban stormwater are not well established. This is particularly the case for intra-event (within event) processes. The intra-event characteristics of total suspended solids and three types of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), fecal coliform, E. coli, and enterococci, were analysed for a watershed in Raleigh, NC, USA. FIB showed higher variability than TSS among intra-event characteristics such as normalized peak concentration, rate of change, and normalized concentration in the first 3 mm of rainfall (C3mm), but similar variability in concentrations throughout each storm. FIB intra-event statistics appear to be influenced by climate variables whereas total suspended sediments statistics are most influenced by hydrologic variables. Changes in intra-event total suspended concentrations were consistently well described by rainfall intensity, while FIB correlations with rainfall intensity were weaker and inconsistent between events. This study showed similar patterns of variability among the intra-event FIB statistics and comparable correlations to climatic and hydrologic variables between fecal coliform, E. coli, and enterococci. Thus, similar processes appear to influence the variability of all three indicator bacteria, suggesting that microbial models may be adaptable amongst various types of FIB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aladenola OO, Adeboye OB (2010) Assessing the potential for rainwater harvesting. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2129–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Salaymeh A, Al-Khatib IA, Arafat HA (2011) Towards sustainable water quality: management of rainwater harvesting cisterns in southern Palestine. Water Resour Manag 25(6):1721–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (APHA, AWWA, and WEF) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KL, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ (2005) Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical water and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):3041–3048

  • Bach PM, McCarthy DT, Deletic A (2010) Redefining the stormwater first flush phenomenon. Water Res 44(8):2487–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton GA, Pitt RE (2002) Stormwater effects handbook: a toolbox for watershed managers, scientists, and engineers. CRC Press, LLC., Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiew FHS, Peel MC, Western AW (2002) Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SimHyd. In: Singh VP, Frevert DK (eds) Mathematical models of small watershed hydrology and applications. Water Resources Publication, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow MF, Yusop Z, Toriman ME (2013) Level and transport pattern of faecal coliform bacteria from tropical urban catchments. Water Sci Technol 67(8):1822–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane SR, Moore JA (1986) Modeling enteric bacterial dieoff: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 27:411–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan HP (1995) A review of urban stormwater quality processes. CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleria A, Vogel RM (2005) Predicting fecal coliform bacteria levels in the Charles River, Massachusetts, USA. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(5):1195–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CM, Coote BG, Ashbolt NJ, Stevenson IM (1996) Relationships between indicators, pathogens, and water quality in an estuarine system. Water Res 30(9):2045–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson C, de Roda Husman AM, Altavilla N, Deere D, Ashbolt N (2003) Fate and transport of surface water pathogens in watersheds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 33(3):299–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries JS, Characklis GW, Noble RT (2006) Attachment of fecal indicator bacteria to particles in the Neuse River Estuary, N.C. J Environ Eng 132(10):1338–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway JM, Hunt WF (2011) Evaluation of first flush for indicator bacteria and total suspended solids in urban stormwater runoff. Water Air Soil Pollut 217:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway JM, Hunt WF, Simmons OD III (2010) Statistical evaluation of factors affecting indicator bacteria in urban storm-water runoff. J Environ Eng 136(12):1360–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway JM, Hunt WF, Graves AK, Bass KL, Caldwell A (2011) Exploring fecal indicator bacteria in a constructed stormwater wetland. Water Sci Technol 63(11):2707–2712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway JM, Tucker RS, Spooner JM, Hunt WF (2012) A traditional analysis of the first flush effect for nutrients in stormwater runoff from two small urban catchments. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(9):5903–5915

  • He J, Valeo C, Chu A, Neumann NF (2010) Characteristics of suspended solids, microorganisms, and chemical water quality in event-based stormwater runoff from an urban residential area. Water Environ Res 82(12):2333–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan C, Chang C, Lee M (2006) Discussion of ‘Design and calibration of a compound sharp-crested weir’ by J. Martinez, J. Reca, M.T. Morillas, and J.G. Lopez. J Hydraul Eng 132(8):868–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell TK, Adrian DD (1981) Development of improved stormwater quality models. J Environ Eng Div 107:957–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Line DE, White NM, Kirby-Smith WW, Potts JD (2008) Fecal coliform export from four coastal North Carolina areas. J Am Water Resour Assoc 44(3):606–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Li D, Guan Y (2014) Understanding the role of urban road surface characteristics in influencing stormwater quality. Water Resour Manag 28:5217–5229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DT (2009) A traditional first flush assessment of E. coli in urban stormwater runoff. Water Sci Technol 60(11):2749–2757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DT, Mitchell VG, Deletic A, Diaper C (2007) Escherichia coli in urban stormwater: explaining their variability. Water Sci Technol 56(11):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DT, Deletic A, Mitchell VG, Diaper C (2011) Development and testing of a model for Micro-Organism Prediction in Urban Stormwater (MOPUS). J Hydrol 409(1–2):236–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DT, Hathaway JM, Hunt WF, Deletic A (2012) Intra-event variability of Escherichia coli and total suspended solids in urban stormwater runoff. Water Res 46(20):6661–6670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell VG, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Hatt BE, McCarthy DT (2007) Achieving multiple benefits from stormwater harvesting. Water Sci Technol 55(4):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nnaji CC, Mama NC (2014) Preliminary assessment of rainwater harvesting potential in Nigeria: focus on flood mitigation and domestic water supply. Water Resour Manag 28:1907–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Olem H (1994) Water quality prevention, identification and management of diffuse pollution. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1054p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG (2006) Land cover impacts on stream nutrients and fecal coliform in the lower piedmont of West Georgia. J Hydrol 331:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvakumar A, Borst M (2006) Variation of microorganism concentrations in urban stormwater runoff with land use and seasons. J Water Health 4(1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen HW, Julien P (1993) Chapter 12: erosion and sediment transport. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinton LW, Hall CH, Lynch PA, Davies-Colley RJ (2002) Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(3):1122–1131

  • St Laurent J, Mazumder A (2014) Influence of seasonal and inter-annual hydro-meteorological variability on surface water fecal coliform concentration under varying land-use composition. Water Res 48:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struck SD, Selvakumar A, Borst M (2008) Prediction of effluent quality from retention ponds and constructed wetlands for managing bacterial stressors in storm-water runoff. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(5):567–578

  • Tsihrintzis VA, Hamid R (1997) Modeling and management of urban stormwater runoff quality: a review. Water Resour Manag 11:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1986) Ambient water quality criteria for bacteria – 1986. EPA 440/5-84-002. Office of Water, Washington, DC

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2003) Bacterial water quality standards for recreational waters: status report. EPA-823-R-03-008. Office of Water, Washington, DC

  • Vaze J, Chiew FHS (2003) Comparative evaluation of urban storm water quality models. Water Resour Res 39:10

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Guidelines for safe recreational water environments, volume 1: coastal and fresh waters. ISBN 92 4 154580 1. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Yacub GP, Castric DA, Stadterman-Knauer KL, Tobin MJ, Blazina M, Heineman TN, Yee GY, Frazier L (2002) Evaluation of Colilert and Enterolert defined substrate methodology for wastewater applications. Water Environ Res 74(2):131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young KD, Thackston EL (1999) Housing density and bacterial loading in urban streams. J Environ Eng 125:1177–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to recognize the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources for funding this project, and thank Shawn Kennedy for his work installing monitoring equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

    J. M. Hathaway

  2. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    W. F. Hunt

  3. Environmental and Public Health Microbiology Laboratory, Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3800

    D. T. McCarthy

Authors
  1. J. M. Hathaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. F. Hunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. T. McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Hathaway.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hathaway, J.M., Hunt, W.F. & McCarthy, D.T. Variability of Intra-event Statistics for Multiple Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Urban Stormwater. Water Resour Manage 29, 3635–3649 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1020-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1020-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation