Skip to main content
Log in

Trend Analysis of Streamflow Drought Events in Nebraska

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A streamflow drought event, defined by applying the threshold level approach on streamflow time series, is composed of three parameters: duration, severity and magnitude. This study reveals statistical characteristics on streamflow drought event parameters and detects spatial and temporal trends in the streamflow drought in terms of frequency, duration and severity in Nebraska. The studies are conducted on three time periods: 1970–2001 (60 stations), 1950–2001 (43 stations), and 1932–2001 (9 stations). The statistical tests performed on the drought event parameters include correlation between event parameters tests, Hurst coefficients and lag-one coefficients, and trend-free pre-whitening Mann–Kendall (TFPW-MK) tests. The analysis shows that there is no uniform trend on the streamflow drought in the whole state. However, some trends are evident for specific regions. Specifically, it is most likely that droughts in the Republican watershed have become more intense; whereas the drought has become slightly alleviated in the Missouri and nearby watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen XH (2004) Streambed hydraulic conductivity for rivers in south-central Nebraska. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(3):561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Chen X (2004) Simulating the effects of reduced precipitation on groundwater and streamflow in the Nebraska Sand Hills. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(2):419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSD (2004) Groundwater-level changes in Nebraska – predevelopment to Spring 2004, Conservation and Survey Division (CSD), University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • de Villiers M (1999) Water. Stoddart Publishing, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG Jr (1980a) On the statistical characteristics of droughts. Water Resour Res 16(2):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dracup JA, Lee KS, Paulson EG Jr (1980b) On the definition of droughts. Water Resour Res 16(2):297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerday CA (eds) (1993) Flat water: a history of Nebraska and its water. Conservation and Survey Division Institute of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Resource Report No. 12

  • Gaume E, Livet M, Desbordes M, Villeneuve JP (2004) Hydrological analysis of the River Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999. J Hydrol 286:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hann CT (1977) Statistical methods in hydrology. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisdal H, Tallaksen LM (eds) (2000) Drought event definition. Technical Report No. 6. Assessment of Regional Impact of Droughts in Europe

  • Hisdal H, Stahl K, Tallaksen LM, Demuth S (2001) Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent. Int J Climatol 21:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon T (1995) The myth of global water wars. Toronto Globe and Mail, November 9, 1995. (Available online at: http://www.homerdixon.com/popularwriting.html)

  • Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116:770–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson SS, Barber NL, Kenny JF, Linsey KS, Lumia DS, Maupin MA (2004) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2000. U. S. Geol Surv Circular 1268:46

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR (1983) Some spatial characteristics of drought duration in the United States. J Appl Meteorol 22(8):1356–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman M (1978) Drought in the Upper Midwest, 1931–1969. J Appl Meteorol 17:1425–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottegoda NT, Natale L, Raiteri E (2004) Some considerations of periodicity and persistence in daily rainfalls. J Hydrol 296(1–4):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB (1994) A view of the River. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (p 312)

  • Lins HF, Slack JR (1999) Streamflow trends in the United States. Geophys Res Lett 26(2):227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauget SA (2003) Multidecadal regime shifts in U.S. streamflow, precipitation, and temperature at the end of the twentieth century. J Climatol 16(23):3905–3916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor KM (1985) Drought during the 1930s and 1950s in the Central United States. Phys Geogr 6:288–301

    Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment Synthesis Team (NAST) (2000) The potential consequences of climate variability and change. US Global Change Research Program

  • Ohlsson L (ed) (2004) The case of Cauvery: upstream–downstream water conflict in India. EDC news. http://www.edcnews.se/Cases/Cauvery.html (accessed in 2004)

  • Oladipo EO (1986) Spatial patterns of drought in the interior plains of North America. J Climatol 6:495–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu JH, Palmer RN, Jeong SM, Lee JH (2003) An optimization model to mitigate conflicts in the Geum River Basin, Korea. In: Proceeding of the World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003, ASCE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 23–25

  • Sakalauskiene G (2003) The Hurst phenomenon in hydrology. Environ Res Eng Manag 3(25):16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD (1993) Analysis and modeling of hydrologic time series. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 19.1–19.72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RH (1975) Drought in the United States, 1931–1940. Annu Assoc Am Geogr 65:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule PT (1992) Spatial patterns of drought frequency and duration in the contiguous USA based on multiple drought event definitions. Int J Climatol 12:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallaksen LM, Madsen H, Clausen B (1997) On the definition and modeling of streamflow drought duration and deficit volume. Hydrol Sci J (Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques) 42(1):15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch VH (1995) Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research. In: von Storch H, Navarra A (eds) Analysis of climate variability: applications of statistical techniques. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen FJ, Chen XH (2006) Evaluation of the impact of groundwater irrigation on streamflow in NE. J Hydrol 327:603–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Ye B, Kane DL (2004) Streamflow changes over Siberian Yenisei River basin. J Hydrol 296:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Pilon P (2003) Canadian streamflow trend detection: impact of serial and cross-correlation. Hydrol Sci J 48(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16:1807–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenhasic E, Salvai A (1987) A method of streamflow drought analysis. Water Resour Res 23(1):156–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leen-Kiat Soh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, H., Soh, LK., Samal, A. et al. Trend Analysis of Streamflow Drought Events in Nebraska. Water Resour Manage 22, 145–164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9148-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9148-6

Key words

Navigation