Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated assessment of water resources: Australian experiences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely accepted that water resource management demands an integrated assessment of resource use options, including local and regional impacts on the environment and stakeholders. Multiple issues, stakeholders and scales of system behaviour must be considered, as well as the key disciplines within and between the human and natural sciences. Modelling is a critical tool in integrated assessment. It enables effects of policy interventions, climate forcing and demographics to be predicted (although with some uncertainty), and provides a means of expanding understanding of river basin behaviour. It also acts as a vehicle for social learning among various interest groups. This paper discusses the various frameworks and methods being used for integrated modelling, and their suitability and unfulfilled potential for these purposes. The frameworks include coupled component models, systems dynamics models, metamodels, risk-assessment approaches, Bayesian decision networks, agent-based methods, expert systems and other heuristic knowledge-based techniques. Specific software platforms are not considered but the lessons from software development and implementation are clearly spelt out. The paper presents three Australian case studies in integrated assessment. They vary in their range of catchment/watershed sizes, hydroclimatology, issues of concern and stakeholders engaged. Two of them utilise a coupled component modelling framework and the third a Bayesian decision network approach. The paper illustrates the value, problems and lessons of integrated assessment and modelling. In particular it proposes some ways to address the challenges of assessing options to obtain more sustainable basin-wide outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2003) Learning to implement adaptive management. Nat Res Man 6:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction and uncertainty analysis. Ecol Mod 173:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzaher A, Lakshminarayan PG, Cabe R, Carriquiry A, Gassman PW, Shogren JF (1993) Metamodels and nonpoint pollution policy in agriculture. Water Res 29:1579–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Page SE, Riolo R, Rand W (2004) Agent-based and analytical modelling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environ Mod Software 19:1097–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JR (1995) Expert systems and environmental modeling. In: Jakeman AJ, Beck MB, McAleer MJ (eds) Modelling change in environmental systems. Wiley, Chichester, pp 505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton ML, Winebrake JJ (1999) Dynamic Modelling of Environmental Systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth R (1984) The expert systems phenomenon. In: Forsyth R (ed) Expert systems: principles and case studies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare M, Letcher R, Jakeman AJ (2003) Participatory modelling in natural resource management: a comparison of four case studies. Integrated Assessment 4:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam SA, Eggins RA, Reynolds KJ (2003) The ASPIRe model: actualising social and personal identity resources to enhance organisational outcomes. J Occup Organ Psychol 76:83–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Management and Assessment. Wiley, Chichester

  • Jakeman AJ (1989) Application of identification and system parameter estimation to environmental problems: some recent examples. In: Barker HA, Young PC (eds) 7th IFAC symposium on identification and system parameter estimation. York, 3–7 July 1985, 1, Oxford:pergamon Press, pp 445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA (2003) Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environ, Mod Softw 18:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA, Norton JP (2006) Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ Mod Softw 21:602–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (1993) Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Anal 13:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammen DM, Hassenzahl DM (1999) Should we risk it? Exploring environmental, health and technological problem solving. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 404 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd AL (1987) Knowledge acquisition an introductory framework. In: Kidd AL (ed) Knowledge acquisition for expert systems: a practical handbook. Plenum Press, New York, 194–pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) Application of an adaptive method for integrated assessment of water allocation issues in the Namoi River Catchment, Australia. Integr Assess 4:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letcher RA, Croke BFC, Jakeman AJ, Merritt WS, (2006) An integrated modelling toolbar for water resources assessment and managementin highland catchments: model discription. Agricultural Systems 89:106–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ Croke BFW (2004) Model development for integrated assessment of water allocation options. Water Resour Res 40:W05502, 15–pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (in press) Integrative frameworks for natural resource management. Envron Mod Softw

  • Merritt WS, Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA, Perez P (2004) A biophysical toolbox for assessment and management of land and water resources in rural catchments in Northern Thailand. Ecol Mod 171:279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostert E (2006), Participation for sustainable water management. In: Giupponi C, Jakeman A, Karssenberg D, Hare M (eds) Sustainable management of water resources: an integrated approach. Elgar, pp. 153–176

  • Newham LTH, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ, Kobayashi T (2004) A framework for integrated hydrologic, sediment and nutrient export modelling for catchment-scale management. Environ Mod Softw 19:1029–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newham LTH, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2004b) Integrated assessment and modelling for catchment management: An Australian case study in participation. In: Henze M (ed) Proceedings of International Symposium: Uncertainty and Precaution in Environmental Management. Copenhagen

  • Newham LTH, Ticehurst JL, Rissik D, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ, Nelson P (2004c) Assessing the sustainability of NSW coastal lakes using a Bayesian decision network approach. In: Proceedings NSW Coastal Conference: Seachange? The Delicate Balancing Act. Lake Macquarie 9th–12th November, pp 63–69

  • Norton JP, Nathan R, Podger G, Vertessy R (2003) Sensitivity assessment needs of complex simulation models for integrated catchment management. In: Post DA (ed) Proceedings Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. MODSIM 2003, 4:1667–1672

  • Pearl J (1988) Probablistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, ISBN 1-55860-479-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Henriksen HJ, Harrar WG, Scholten H, Kassahun A (2005) Quality assurance in model based water management – review of existing practice and outline of new approaches. Environ Mod Softw (in press)

  • Sadoddin A, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A Bayesian decision network approach for salinity management in the Little River Catchment. NSW, In: Post DA (ed) Proceedings Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. MODSIM 2003, 3:953–958

  • Schmoldt DL (1998) Knowledge acquisition using linguistic-based knowledge analysis. AI Appl 12(1–3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell P (1985) Expert Systems: A Practical Introduction. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spate JM, Croke BFC, Jakeman AJ (2003) Data mining in hydrology. In: Post DA (ed) Proceedings modelling and simulation society of Australia and New Zealand. MODSIM 2003 4:422–427

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. F. W. Croke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Croke, B.F.W., Ticehurst, J.L., Letcher, R.A. et al. Integrated assessment of water resources: Australian experiences. Water Resour Manage 21, 351–373 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9057-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9057-8

Keywords

Navigation