Skip to main content
Log in

The Planned Close of an NGO: Evidence for a New Organizational Form?

  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines a human rights NGO that ceased operations after only 8 years. A voluntary and planned end, this case raises the possibility of a new form, the time-bound organization. Through a series of interviews with staff, board members, the founder, and key external stakeholders, this study examines the nonprofit’s leadership, time-bound structure, strategic approach, and wind-down process. Drawing on the lessons of this case, this article identifies benefits and challenges of the time-bound organization form. A range of voluntary organizations could learn from this example and consider the form, including nonprofits experiencing a leadership transition, facing environmental threats, or considering a structural change such as a merger.

Resume

Cet article examine une ONG des droits de l’homme ayant interrompu ses opérations après seulement huit ans. Ce cas, avec sa fin volontaire et planifiée, ouvre la possibilité d’une forme nouvelle, à savoir l’organisation limitée dans le temps. Au moyen d’une série d’entretiens avec le personnel, les membres du conseil d’administration, le fondateur et des parties prenantes externes clés, cet article examine le leadership d’une organisation sans but lucratif, la structure de durée limitée, l’approche stratégique, et le processus de liquidation. S’inspirant des leçons de ce cas, l’article identifie les bénéfices et les défis de la forme d’organisation limitée dans le temps. Une série d’organisations bénévoles pourraient apprendre de cet exemple et envisager cette forme, y compris les organisations sans but lucratif confrontées à une transition de leadership, à des menaces environnementales ou envisageant une modification structurelle telle qu’une fusion.

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht eine nicht-staatliche Menschenrechtsorganisation, die ihre Arbeit nach nur acht Jahren eingestellt hat. Dieses Beispiel einer freiwilligen und geplanten Beendigung zeigt die Möglichkeit einer neuen Organisationsform, die zeitlich begrenzte Organisation. Der Beitrag untersucht mittels einer Reihe von Befragungen der Mitarbeiter, der Vorstandsmitglieder, des Gründers und wichtiger externer Stakeholder die Führung, die zeitlich begrenzte Struktur, den strategischen Ansatz und den Auflösungsprozess der Nonprofit-Organisation. Ausgehend von den gelernten Lektionen aus diesem Fall stellt der Beitrag die Vorteile und Probleme der zeitlich begrenzten Organisationsform heraus. Eine Reihe von ehrenamtlichen Organisationen könnte an dem Beispiel lernen und diese Form in Betracht ziehen, einschließlich Nonprofit-Organisationen, die einen Führungswechsel durchmachen, mit Umweltbedrohungen konfrontiert werden oder eine strukturelle Änderung, wie beispielsweise eine Fusion, erwägen.

Resumen

Este documento examina una ONG de derechos humanos que cesó sus operaciones después de sólo ocho años. Un final voluntario y planificado, este caso plantea la posibilidad de una nueva forma, la organización limitada en el tiempo. Mediante una serie de entrevistas con el personal, los miembros del consejo, el fundador, y partes interesadas externas claves, este documento examina el liderazgo de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro, la estructura limitada en el tiempo, el enfoque estratégico y el proceso de disolución. Extrayendo lecciones de este caso, el presente documento identifica los beneficios y retos de la forma de organización limitada en el tiempo. Una serie de organizaciones voluntarias podrían aprender de este ejemplo y considerar esta forma, incluidas las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro que experimentan una transición de liderazgo, las que se enfrentan a amenazas medioambientales o las que consideran un cambio estructural, como una fusión.

Chinese中文

本文考察了一个仅运营八年就终结的人权组织。这个自发而起、自主而终的案例表明了一种新的组织模式——时限性组织。通过对前组织员工、董事会成员、创始人以及外部主要利益关系人的一系列采访,本文考察了这个非营利性组织的领导层、时限性结构、战略取向和终结流程。以此案例为鉴,本文梳理了时限性组织模式的利弊。此例的经验和模式对于多数志愿组织都具有普适性,包括非营利性组织的领导换届、环境威胁的应对或通过合并进行结构改革等。

Arabic

يفحص هذا البحث حقوق الإنسان للمنظمات الغير حكومية (NGO) التي أوقفت عملياتها بعد ثماني سنوات فقط. نهاية تطوعية ونهاية مخطط لها، هذه الحالة تثير إحتمال وجود شكل جديد، تنظيم زمني محدد. من خلال سلسلة من المقابلات مع الموظفين، أعضاء مجلس الإدارة، المؤسس، وأصحاب المصلحة الخارجيين الرئيسيين، يفحص هذا البحث القيادة الغير ربحية، هيكل محدد زمنيا˝، نهج إستراتيجي، وتقليص الإجراء. إستناد˝ إلى الدروس المستفادة من هذه الحالة، فإن هذا البحث يحدد الفوائد والتحديات في شكل تنظيم زمني محدد. يمكن لمجموعة من المنظمات التطوعية أن تتعلم من هذا المثال والنظر في شكل من الأشكال، بما في ذلك المنظمات الغير ربحية التي تعاني من إنتقال القيادة، التي تواجه تهديدات بيئية، أو تفكر في تغيير هيكلي مثل الإندماج.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, M. (2002). Into the fire: Boards and executive transitions. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. (1985). The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W., & Van de Ven, A. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlantic Reports (2010) Turning passion into action: Giving while living. Retrieved Jan 24, 2012, from http://www.atlanticphilanthropies.org/learning/atlantic-report/turning-passion-action-giving-while-living.

  • Bays, J., Dua, A., & Taliento, L. (2006). A nonprofit goes for broke. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved Jan 24, 2012, from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/A_nonprofit_goes_for_broke_1851.

  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Stole, L. A. (1993). Do short-term objectives lead to under-or overinvestment in long-term projects? Journal of Finance, 48(2), 719–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechky, B. (2000). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beldon Fund (2009) Giving while living: The Beldon Fund spend-out story. Retrieved Jan, 2012, from www.beldon.org/beldonfund_1.pdf.

  • Block, S., & Rosenberg, S. (2002). Toward an understanding of founder’s syndrome: An assessment of power and privilege among founders of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G., & Delacroix, J. (1982). Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: An ecological approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(2), 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T., & Vogelsang, J. (2005). Executive director transitions: An organization development approach. Journal for Nonprofit Management, 9(1), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(02), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative science quarterly, 42(4), 750–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golensky, M. (2005). Out with the old, in with the new: A case study of a successful leadership transition. Journal for Nonprofit Management, 1, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S., & Sutton, R. (1986). Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. R. (1986). Reputation and contractual performance in long-term projects. The Rand Journal of Economics, 17(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnell, D. (2005). Founders and other gods. The Nonprofit Quarterly, 12(4), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, R., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, R., & Steinthórsson, R. (2003). Studying organizations as temporary. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2008). Procrastination on long-term projects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrower, F. (2009). Limited life foundations: Motivations, experiences, and strategies. The Urban Institute, Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy. Retrieved Jan 24, 2012, from http://www.urban.org/publications/411836.html.

  • Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E. (1989). Environments and strategies of organization start-up: Effects on early survival. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., House, R., & Tucker, D. (1986). Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. (1987). The process of organizational death: Disbanding and reconnecting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 542–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., & DeFillippi, B. (2004). Project organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge. Organization Studies, 25, 1475–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, T. (2006). The leadership deficit. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(2), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvin, P. (2004). Human rights and development. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (1988). Is population ecology a useful paradigm for the study of organizations? American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Berlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berlan, D., Bruno-van Vijfeijken, T. The Planned Close of an NGO: Evidence for a New Organizational Form?. Voluntas 24, 262–275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9300-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9300-2

Keywords

Navigation