Skip to main content
Log in

Looking Beyond Traditional Volunteer Management: A Case Study of an Alternative Approach to Volunteer Engagement in Parks and Recreation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an era of declining volunteerism it is critical to examine alternative approaches to volunteer management that may better promote engagement and address common barriers to volunteering. Using a “best practices” Canadian case study approach, this research describes an alternative approach to volunteer engagement that emphasizes lifestyle integration, organizational informality and flexibility, and volunteer–agency collaboration. We suggest that traditional volunteer management structures may actually be hindering engagement and call instead for a more vocation-based, networked, and collaborative approach which affords greater autonomy to the volunteer and sees power being shared between agencies and volunteers.

Résumé

Dans une ère de déclin du bénévolat, il est impératif d’examiner des approches alternatives propres à mieux promouvoir sa gestion et résoudre ce qui fait lui fait obstacle. En ce référent aux «meilleures pratiques» d’une étude de cas canadienne, cette recherche décrit une alternative de façon à ce que l’engagement bénévole mette l’accent sur l’intégration du style de vie, l’absence de formalité organisationnelle garante de souplesse, et en collaboration avec des agences se consacrant au bénévolat. Nous suggérons que les structures de gestion du bénévolat traditionnelles peuvent en fait entraver leur engagement mais emmener dans son sillage un élément permettant une plus grande autonomie et partager équitablement l’action conjointe des agences et des bénévoles.

Zusammenfassung

In einer Ära von rückläufiger ehrenamtlicher Tätigkeit ist es entscheidend, alternative Ansätze zum Management von ehrenamtlichen Helfern zu prüfen, die möglicherweise besser das Engagement fördern und auf verbreitete Barrieren zum Volontieren eingehen. Die “best practices” einer kanadischen Fallstudienmethode nutzend beschreibt diese Untersuchung einen alternativen Ansatz zum Management von Ehrenamtlichen, der Integration des Lebensstils, organisatorische Zwanglosigkeit und Flexibilität und Zusammenarbeit von Ehrenamtlichen und Agentur betont. Wir behaupten, dass traditionelle Strukturen des Managements von Ehrenamtlichen sogar Engagement behindern kann und fordern stattdessen eine mehr berufsbasierte, vernetzte und gemeinschaftliche Herangehensweise, die dem ehrenamtlichen Helfer größere Autonomie bietet und die Macht zwischen Agenturen und Ehrenamtlichen teilt.

Resumen

En una época de declive del voluntariado, es esencial examinar los enfoques alternativos a la gestión de los voluntarios que mejor fomentarían el compromiso y derribarían las barreras comunes al voluntariado. Enfocándonos en un estudio de caso canadiense para las mejores prácticas, este estudio describe un método alternativo al compromiso de los voluntarios que hace hincapié en la integración en el estilo de vida, la informalidad y la flexibilidad organizativa y la colaboración en organismos de voluntarios. Sugerimos que las estructuras tradicionales de gestión voluntaria pueden ser un obstáculo al compromiso y exigimos un enfoque más colaborador, organizado en red y basado en la vocación que permita una mayor autonomía a los voluntarios y busque un reparto de poder entre los organismos y los voluntarios.

摘要

如今,志愿行为日显势微,所以我们必须检视志愿者管理的另类途径,以更好地推动参与程度,并消除影响人们参与志愿活动的一些常见障碍。通过使用了一种加拿大式的“最佳实践”型案例研究方法,本研究论文描述了一种独特的志愿者管理模式,该模式重视志愿行为与生活方式的整合,重视相关组织机构的非正式型和灵活性,以及志愿者与机构之间的合作。我们认为,传统的志愿者管理结构可能实际上对志愿者参与度造成了一定负面影响,所以我们需要一种基于职业的、网络化的合作型新模式,这种模式应为志愿者提供更大的自主权,并使志愿者与志愿机构之间实现一定的权力分享。

ملخص

إنه من الأهمية في عصر قلة المتقدمين للتطوع أن ننظر إلى سبل بديلة لإدارة المتطوعين التي قد تعزز المشاركة بطريقة أفضل و تعالج العوائق المشتركة التي تحول دون العمل التطوعي. بإستخدام “أفضل الممارسات” منهاج دراسة حالة كندية، هذا البحث يصف نهج بديل لمشاركة المتطوع الذي يؤكد على دمج أسلوب الحياة، تنظيمي غير رسمي و المرونة، والتعاون بين وكالات المتطوعين. نقترح أن هياكل إدارة المتطوعين التقليدية ممكن أن يعوق الإشتراك وندعو بدلاً من ذلك إلى أساس مهني، الشبكية، والنهج التعاوني الذي يتيح قدرًا أكبر من الحكم الذاتي للمتطوعين ، ونرى القوة تتقاسم بين الوكالات والمتطوعين.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K. (2006). From motivation to action through volunteer-friendly organizations. The International Journal of Volunteer Administration, 24(1), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, C., Harvey, J., & Dawson, D. (1994). Evolution of local state activity: Recreation policy in Toronto. Leisure Studies, 13, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman, E. (2007). What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? A history of measurement in the British Voluntary Sector. Voluntas, 18, 110–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothryod, P., & David, C. (1993). Community economic development: Three approaches. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brightbill, C. (1960). The challenge of leisure. New Jersey, NY: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, J., & Nezhina, T. (2005). What is old is new again: Achieving effectiveness with volunteer programs in Kazakhstan. Voluntas, 16(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L., & Andereck, K. (1994). Motives for initiating and continuing membership in a recreation-related voluntary association. Leisure Sciences, 16, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P., & Wilson, V. (1961). Incentive systems: A theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E., & Synder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R., & Goldberg-Glen, R. (1991). Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(3), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 364–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, J. (1999). Financing and acquiring park and recreation resources. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, G. (1990). A social history of leisure since 1600. State College, PA: Venture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1984). The research act. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVita, M. C. (2004). Places for people: A white paper from the Project for Public Spaces. www.pps.org/upo/info/whyneed/socbenefits/DeVita.TPL

  • Ellis, S., & Noyes, K. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. (2007). Correlates of satisfaction in older volunteers: A motivational perspective. The International Journal of Volunteer Administration, 24(5), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, T., Parry, D., & Shinew, K. (2005). Building relationships, accessing resources: Mobilizing social capital in community garden contexts. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 450–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goblin Conn, L., & Barr, C. (2006). Core volunteers: Exploring the values, attitudes and behaviours underlying sustained volunteerism in Canada. Toronto, ON: Imagine Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Lasby, D., Gummulka, G., & Tyron, C. (2006). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2004 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Industry (Statistics Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., Cnaan, R., Brudney, J., Ascoli, U., Meijs, L., & Ranade, S. (2000). Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. Voluntas, 11(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig, B., Jegers, M., & Lapsley, I. (2004). Challenges in managing nonprofit organizations: A research overview. Voluntas, 15(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. (1991). The board member’s guide to fundraising. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, L., & Lammertyn, F. (2003). Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: A sociological modernization perspective. Voluntas, 14(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. (1997). Communities of the heart: A new way of looking at philanthropy. National Civic Review, 86(4), 325–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Chelladurai, P., & Trail, G. (2007). A model of volunteer retention in youth sport. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, J. (2008). Nonprofit isomorphism: An Australia–United States comparison. Voluntas, 19, 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham, S. (1991). The impact of Prairie and Maritime reformers and boosters on the development of parks and playgrounds, 1880–1930. Loisir et societe/Society and Leisure, 14(1), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B., Fraccastoto, K., & McNary, L. (2007). The relationship among organizational-based self-esteem and various factors motivating volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K. (1982). Noblesse oblige: Charity and cultural philanthropy in Chicago, 1849–1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClinktok, N. (2004). Understanding Canadian volunteers: Using the national survey of giving, volunteering, and participating to build your volunteer program. Toronto, ON: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, E. M. (1970). The development of public recreation in Canada. Canada: Canadian Parks/Recreation Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijs, L., & Karr, L. B. (2004). Managing volunteers in different settings: Membership and programme management. In R. Stebbins & M. Graham (Eds.), Volunteering as leisure/Leisure as volunteering: An international assessment (pp. 177–193). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1997). Volunteering-altruism, markets, causes and leisure. World Leisure, 39(3), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehberg, W. (2005). Altruistic individualists: Motivations for international volunteering among young adults in Switzerland. Voluntas, 16(2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, E. K. (2004). “It’s not fun any more”: A case study of organizing a contemporary grassroots recreation association. Society and Leisure/Loisir et Societe, 26(2), 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Allen, J. (2006). “We actually trust the community”: Examining the dynamics of a nonprofit funding relationship in New Zealand. Voluntas, 17, 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, K., Marshall, E., & Ellis, G. (2001). Measuring job satisfaction of volunteers in public parks and recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soy, S. K. (1997). The case study as a research method. Unpublished paper, University of Texas at Austin. www.ischool.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (2004). Introduction. In R. Stebbins & M. Graham (Eds.), Volunteering as leisure/Leisure as volunteering: An international assessment (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stormann, W. (1991). The ideology of the American urban parks and recreation movement: Past and future. Leisure Sciences, 13(2), 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traynor, B. (2008). Community building: Limitations and promise. In J. deFilippis & S. Saegert (Eds.), The community development reader (pp. 214–224). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wearing, S. (2002). Volunteer tourism: Experiences that make a difference. Cambridge, MA: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigenhaft, R., Armstrong, J., Quintis, F., & Riddick, A. (1996). The motivations and effectiveness of hospital volunteers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the work of our research assistant, Stephanie Schope, whose hard work and interest in this project were invaluable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha L. Barnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, M.L., Sharpe, E.K. Looking Beyond Traditional Volunteer Management: A Case Study of an Alternative Approach to Volunteer Engagement in Parks and Recreation. Voluntas 20, 169–187 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9080-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9080-5

Keywords

Navigation