Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular characterization of Plum pox virus Rec isolates from Russia suggests a new insight into evolution of the strain

  • Published:
Virus Genes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV), belonging to the strain Rec, have been found for the first time in Russia. Full-size genomes of the isolates K28 and Kisl-1pl from myrobalan and plum, respectively, were sequenced on the 454 platform. Analysis of all known PPV-Rec complete genomes using the Recombination Detection Program (RDP4) revealed yet another recombination event in the 5′-terminal region. This event was detected by seven algorithms, implemented in the RDP4, with statistically significant P values and supported by a phylogenetic analysis with the bootstrap value of 87%. A putative PPV-M-derived segment, encompassing the C-terminus of the P1 gene and approximately two-thirds of the HcPro gene, is bordered by breakpoints at positions 760–940 and 1838–1964, depending on the recombinant isolate. The predicted 5′-distal breakpoint for the isolate Valjevka is located at position 2804. The Dideron (strain D) and SK68 (strain M) isolates were inferred as major and minor parents, respectively. Finding of another recombination event suggests more complex evolutionary history of PPV-Rec than previously assumed. Perhaps the first recombination event led to the formation of a PPV-D variant harboring the PPV-M-derived fragment within the 5′-proximal part of the genome. Subsequent recombination of its descendant with PPV-M in the 3′-proximal genomic region resulted in the emergence of the evolutionary successful strain Rec.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. M. Barba, A. Hadidi, T. Candresse, M. Cambra, in Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of Pome and Stone Fruits, ed. by A. Hadidi, M. Barba, T. Candresse, W. Jelkmann (APS Press, St. Paul, 2011), p. 185

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Subr, M. Glasa, Acta Virol. 57, 217 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Garcia, M. Glasa, M. Cambra, T. Candresse, Mol. Plant. Pathol. 15, 226 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Glasa, L. Palkovics, P. Kominek, G. Labonne, S. Pittnerova, O. Kudela, T. Candresse, Z. Šubr, J. Gen. Virol. 85, 2671 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Glasa, T. Candresse, Virus Res. 108, 199 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Ulubas Serçe, T. Candresse, L. Svanella-Dumas, L. Krizbai, M. Gazel, K. Cağlayan, Virus Res. 142, 121 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. James, D. Sanderson, A. Varga, A. Sheveleva, S. Chirkov, Phytopathology 106, 407 (2016)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Glasa, T. Malinowski, L. Predajna, N. Pupola, D. Dekena, L. Michalczuk, T. Candresse, Phytopathology 101, 980 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D. James, A. Varga, Virus Res. 110, 143 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D. James, A. Varga, D. Sanderson, Can. J. Plant Pathol. 35, 431 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Glasa, V. Marie-Jeanne, G. Labonne, Z. Šubr, O. Kudela, J.-B. Quiot, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 108, 843 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Gadiou, D. Safarova, M. Navratil, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 121, 513 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Kamenova, J. Plant Pathol. 96, 411 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Salamon, L. Palkovics, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 108, 903 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.T. Cervera, J.L. Reichmann, M.T. Martin, J.A. Garcia, J. Gen. Virol. 74, 329 (1993)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Glasa, S. Paunovic, D. Jevremovic, A. Myrta, S. Pittnerova, T. Candresse, Arch. Virol. 150, 2051 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Jevremovic, S. Paunovic, Pestic. Phytomed. 29, 97 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. Kajic, S. Cerni, M. Krajacic, I. Mikec, D. Škoric, J. Plant Pathol. 90(S1), 9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Matic, M. Al Rwahnih, A. Myrta, Plant. Pathol. 55, 11 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Myrta, M. Al Rwahnih, V. Savino, J. Plant Pathol. 87, 127 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Svanella-Dumas, I. Maurice, V. Blin, R. Quaren, C. Birgaentzle, T. Candresse, Plant Dis. 99, 421 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Kollerova, S. Novakova, Z. Šubr, M. Glasa, Plant Dis. 90, 1108 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Candresse, L. Svanella-Dumas, P. Gentit, K. Caglayan, B. Cevik, Plant Dis. 91, 331 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Gurkan, A. Ceylan, Turk. J. Agric. For. 40, 746 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. Thompson, A. Varga, H. De Costa, C. Birch, M. Glasa, D. James, Plant Dis. 93, 674 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D.P. Martin, B. Murrell, M. Golden, A. Khoosal, B. Muhire, Virus Evol. 1, 1 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Wetzel, T. Candresse, G. Macquaire, M. Ravelonandro, J. Dunez, J. Virol. Method 39, 27 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Wetzel, T. Candresse, M. Ravelonandro, J. Dunez, J. Virol. Method 33, 355 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Glasa, Y. Prikhodko, L. Predajna, A. Nagyova, Y. Shneyder, T. Zhivaeva, Z. Šubr, M. Cambra, T. Candresse, Phytopathology 103, 972 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D. James, A. Varga, Acta Hortic. 657, 177 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. L. Nemchinov, A. Hadidi, J. Virol. Method 70, 231 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Olmos, M. Cambra, M.A. Dasi, T. Candresse, O. Esteban, M.T. Gorris, M. Asensio, J. Virol. Method 68, 127 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Z. Šubr, S. Pittnerova, M. Glasa, Acta Virol. 48, 173 (2004)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Sheveleva, A. Kudryavtseva, A. Speranskaya, M. Belenikin, N. Melnikova, S. Chirkov, Virus Genes 47, 385 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. T.A. Hall, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Tamura, J. Dudley, M. Nei, S. Kumar, Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. E.R. Chare, E.S. Holmes, Arch. Virol. 151, 933 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Salminen, D. Martin, in The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing, ed. by P. Lemey, M. Salemi, A.-M. Vandamme (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009), p. 519

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Sanderson, J. Fu, D. James, Acta Hortic. 1163, 107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. I. Kamenova, J. Plant Pathol. 90(S1), 15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. I. Kamenova, E. Tasheva-Terzieva, K. Dragoyski, B. Stefanova, J. Phytopathol. 165, 602 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. I. Mikec, V. Kajić, M. Krajačić, D. Śkorić, Acta Hortic. 781, 193 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. L. Zagrai, I. Zagrai, B. Ferencz, I. Gaboreanu, K. Kovacs, I. Petricele, O. Popescu, D. Pamfil, N. Capote, J. Plant Pathol. 90(S1), 41 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No 14-24-00007). The next generation sequencing on 454 platform was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No 14-04-01786).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SC, IM, and AK designed the experiments; AS, AK, and PI performed the experiments; SC, PI, IM, AK, and AS analyzed the data; SC, PI, and IM wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergei Chirkov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Edited by Seung-Kook Choi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11262_2018_1541_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Fig. S1 Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction amplification products from PPV-infected leaf samples using PPV-Rec (mD5/mM3) and PPV-M (P1/PM) strain-specific primers. M - GeneRuler 100 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific). The arrows on the right show the products specific for PPV-Rec (605 bp) and PPV-M (198 bp). Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 243 kb)

11262_2018_1541_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Fig. S2 BootScan analysis of recombination in the 5′-proximal region of PPV-Rec genomes using the RDP4 package. Only 5′-proximal part of the genomes is shown. The names of isolates are presented above the pictures. Purple and sea-green lines indicate grouping of different parts of the PPV-Rec genomes with PPV-M (isolate SK-68) or PPV-D (isolate Dideron), respectively. Window 800 nt, step 20 nt. The dotted line shows an arbitrary 80% cut-off bootstrap support. Recombination region predicted by the RDP4 analysis is presented in pink. Numerals on the top of the pink area indicate average P-values. Supplementary material 2 (PDF 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chirkov, S., Ivanov, P., Sheveleva, A. et al. Molecular characterization of Plum pox virus Rec isolates from Russia suggests a new insight into evolution of the strain. Virus Genes 54, 328–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-018-1541-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-018-1541-8

Keywords

Navigation