Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic value of histopathological scoring and grading in patients with renal AA amyloidosis

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The amount and distribution pattern of amyloid deposits may contribute to renal function and outcome, given the great diversity of renal involvement in amyloidosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of histological characteristics of patients with biopsy-proven renal AA amyloidosis (AAA) on renal outcome.

Methods

Renal biopsies of 37 patients with AAA were re-evaluated. The distribution pattern of glomerular amyloid (GA) deposits was classified, the extent of amyloid deposits in glomeruli, vessel, and interstitium and other histopathologic lesions were scored, and renal amyloid prognostic score (RAPS) was determined by summing all scores. Their potential prognostic relevance on renal outcome was investigated.

Results

GA and vascular amyloid (VA) deposits were noted in all cases, interstitial amyloid (IA) was detected in 70.2%. GA deposits were predominantly seen in diffuse mesengiocapillary fashions (class IV) (51.4%). GA class, the extent of GA, VA, IA deposit, and RAPS, as well as interstitial fibrosis (IF) and interstitial inflammation were correlated to renal function at diagnosis. During the median follow-up of 52 months, 13 patients developed doubling of serum creatinine or end stage renal disease and they had a higher degree of GA and VA load (p = 0.03 and p = 0.042, respectively) as compared to the remaining patients. VA load, but not GA and RAPS grade, was associated with poor renal outcome (HR 3.016, 95% CI 1.45–6.25, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Baseline renal function is closely linked to the extent of AA amyloid deposit in renal parenchyma but only VA load was a predictor of renal outcome in AAA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joss N, McLaughlin K, Simpson K, Boulton-Jones JM (2000) Presentation, survival and prognostic markers in AA amyloidosis. QJM 93(8):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/93.8.535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuglular S, Yalcinkaya F, Paydas S, Oner A, Utas C, Bozfakioglu S, Ataman R et al (2002) A retrospective analysis for aetiology and clinical findings of 287 secondary amyloidosis cases in Turkey. Nephrol Dial Transpl 17(11):2003–2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/17.11.2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Said SM, Sethi S, Valeri AM, Leung N, Cornell LD, Fidler ME, Herrera Hernandez L et al (2013) Renal amyloidosis: origin and clinicopathologic correlations of 474 recent cases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8(9):1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10491012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. von Hutten H, Mihatsch M, Lobeck H, Rudolph B, Eriksson M, Röcken C (2009) Prevalence and origin of amyloid in kidney biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 33(8):1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181abdfa7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dember LM (2006) Amyloidosis-associated kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17(12):3458–3471. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006050460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishi S, Alchi B, Imai N, Gejyo F (2008) New advances in renal amyloidosis. Clin Exp Nephrol 12(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-007-0008-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uda H, Yokota A, Kobayashi K, Miyake T, Fushimi H, Maeda A, Saiki O (2006) Two distinct clinical courses of renal involvement in rheumatoid patients with AA amyloidosis. J Rheumatol 33(8):1482–1487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasatomi Y, Kiyoshi Y, Uesugi N, Hisano S, Takebayashi S (2001) Prognosis of renal amyloidosis: a clinicopathological study using cluster analysis. Nephron 87(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1159/000045883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verine J, Mourad N, Desseaux K, Vanhille P, Noël LH, Beaufils H, Grateau G et al (2007) Clinical and histological characteristics of renal AA amyloidosis: a retrospective study of 68 cases with a special interest to amyloid-associated inflammatory response. Hum Pathol 38(12):1798–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2007.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurita N, Kotera N, Ishimoto Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka S, Toda N, Fujii A et al (2013) AA amyloid nephropathy with predominant vascular deposition in Crohn’s disease. Clin Nephrol 79(3):229–232. https://doi.org/10.5414/cn107151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sen S, Sarsik B (2010) A proposed histopathologic classification, scoring, and grading system for renal amyloidosis: standardization of renal amyloid biopsy report. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134(4):532–544. https://doi.org/10.5858/134.4.532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nienhuis HL, Bijzet J, Hazenberg BP (2016) The prevalence and management of systemic amyloidosis in western countries. Kidney Dis (Basel) 2(1):10–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yilmaz M, Unsal A, Sokmen M, Kaptanogullari OH, Alkim C, Kabukcuoglu F, Ozagari A et al (2013) Renal involvement in AA amyloidosis: clinical outcomes and survival. Kidney Blood Press Res 37(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahbap E, Kara E, Sahutoglu T, Basturk T, Koc Y, Sakaci T, Sevinc M et al (2014) Outcome of 121 patients with renal amyloid a amyloidosis. J Res Med Sci 19(7):644–649

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuroda T, Tanabe N, Kobayashi D, Wada Y, Murakami S, Nakano M, Narita I (2012) Significant association between renal function and area of amyloid deposition in kidney biopsy specimens in reactive amyloidosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 32(10):3155–3162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2148-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuroda T, Ito Y, Imai N, Nozawa Y, Sato H, Nakatsue T, Wada Y et al (2017) Significant association between renal function and area of amyloid deposition evident in kidney biopsy specimens in both AA and AL amyloidosis. Amyloid 24(sup1):151–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506129.2017.1291421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Castano E, Palmer MB, Vigneault C, Luciano R, Wong S, Moeckel G (2015) Comparison of amyloid deposition in human kidney biopsies as predictor of poor patient outcome. BMC Nephrol 29(16):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0046-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Min KW, Na W, Jang SM, Park MH (2011) Prognostic associations of clinical and histopathological features in renal amyloidosis. Postgrad Med J 87(1030):529–534. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.110965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiiki H, Shimokama T, Yoshikawa Y, Toyoshima H, Kitamoto T, Watanabe T (1988) Renal amyloidosis. Correlations between morphology, chemical types of amyloid protein and clinical features. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 412(3):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00737143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopfer H, Wiech T, Mihatsch MJ (2011) Renal amyloidosis revisited: amyloid distribution, dynamics and biochemical type. Nephrol Dial Transpl 26(9):2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuroda T, Tanabe N, Hasegawa E, Wakamatsu A, Nozawa Y, Sato H, Nakatsue T et al (2017) Significant association between renal function and area of amyloid deposition in kidney biopsy specimens in both AA amyloidosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis and AL amyloidosis. Amyloid 24(2):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506129.2017.1338565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozawa M, Komatsuda A, Ohtani H, Nara M, Sato R, Togashi M, Takahashi N et al (2016) Long-term prognosis of AL and AA renal amyloidosis: a Japanese single-center experience. Clin Exp Nephrol 21(2):212–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-016-1271-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kendi Celebi Z, Kiremitci S, Ozturk B, Akturk S, Erdogmus S, Duman N, Ates K et al (2017) Kidney biopsy in AA amyloidosis: impact of histopathology on prognosis. Amyloid 24(3):176–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506129.2017.1350158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Celtik A, Sen S, Keklik F, Saydam G, Asci G, Sarsik B, Ozkahya M et al (2020) A histopathological scoring and grading system to predict outcome for patients with AA amyloidosis. Int Urol Nephrol 52(7):1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02505-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kidd J, Carl DE (2016) Renal amyloidosis. Curr Probl Cancer 40(5–6):209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2016.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Emire Bor, EMPIAR Statistic, for performing the statistical analysis of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arzu Ozdemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study was not supported by any third party and the work was received any financial support. Each author read the manuscript and agree with this submission. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with regard to the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozdemir, A., Yılmaz, M., Ozagari, A.A. et al. Prognostic value of histopathological scoring and grading in patients with renal AA amyloidosis. Int Urol Nephrol 54, 2591–2597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03163-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03163-y

Keywords

Navigation