Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Haemodynamic, electrolyte and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives were to evaluate haemodynamic, electrolyte and metabolic changes in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy when normal saline was used for irrigation; and to correlate these changes with irrigation time, volume of irrigation fluid absorbed and number of percutaneous interventions.

Methods

Twenty adults undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy were studied. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, arterial blood gases, electrolytes and temperature were monitored before, during and after irrigation. Haemoglobin, urea and creatinine values were recorded before and 24 h after the procedure. Durations of anaesthesia and irrigation; volumes of irrigation fluid used and effluent fluid; and number of percutaneous interventions during the procedure were also recorded.

Results

No significant changes occurred in mean heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, electrolytes, haemoglobin, urea and creatinine. There was a significant fall in mean pH in post-operative period (P = 0.003) and bicarbonate values showed a negative correlation with duration of irrigation. Number of percutaneous interventions had positive correlations with duration of irrigation and volume of irrigant fluid absorbed.

Conclusions

No significant changes occurred in haemodynamics and electrolytes, but there was a trend towards metabolic acidosis. Arterial blood gases should be monitored during and after PCNL in cases with prolonged irrigation time, repeated percutaneous interventions and patients having compromised renal function and metabolic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125:463–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sinclair JF, Hutchison A, Baraza R, Telfer AB (1985) Absorption of 1.5% glycine after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for renal stone disease. Br Med J 291:691–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimberg M, Norlen H, Hoglund N, Allgen LG (1993) Absorption of irrigating fluid during percutaneous transrenal lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 27:463–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malhotra SK, Khaitan A, Goswami AK et al (2001) Monitoring of irrigation fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: the use of 1% ethanol as a marker. Anaesthesia 56:1090–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atici S, Zeren S, Aribogan A (2001) Hormonal and hemodynamic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 32:311–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koroglu A, Togal T, Cicek M et al (2003) The effects of irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time on fluid electrolyte balance and hemodynamics in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 35:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gehring H, Nahm W, Zimmermann K et al (1999) Irrigating fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Badawy H, Salama A, Eissa M et al (1999) Percutaneous management of renal calculi: Experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 60 children. J Urol 162:1710–1713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Medha Mohta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohta, M., Bhagchandani, T., Tyagi, A. et al. Haemodynamic, electrolyte and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40, 477–482 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9093-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9093-6

Keywords

Navigation