Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of aboveground tree biomass, home age, and yard maintenance on soil carbon levels in residential yards

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid urbanization of natural lands, researchers have begun to examine the capacity of urban soils to store carbon (C), with recent attention to residential yards. We performed a case study to examine four potential influences on soil C levels in residential yards. In 67 yards containing trees, we examined the relationship of soil C (kg m−2) to tree aboveground biomass, home age (3–87 years), yard maintenance (fertilization, irrigation, mulching or bagging lawn clippings), and soil texture (% clay, % sand, % silt), at three depths (0–15 cm, 15–30 cm, and 30–50 cm). Six tree aboveground biomass data sets were developed: 1) biomass, 2) biomass*(1/distance from tree), 3) biomass ≤ 15 m from sample site, 4) biomass ≤ 10 m, 5) biomass ≤ 5 m, and 6) biomass ≤ 4 m. Biomass ≤ 5 m and biomass ≤ 4 m had the greatest explanatory power for soil C at 30–50 cm depth (P = 0.001, R2 = 0.28; P = 0.05 R2 = 0.39, respectively). The relationship between soil C and home age was positive at 0–15 cm (P = 0.0003, R2 = 0.19), but constant at the two lower depths. Yard maintenance had no significant influence on soil C levels across home age. At 0–15 cm, soil C increased with % silt (P = 0.006, R2 = 0.12). Overall, trees in turfgrass yards may have a stabilizing effect on soil C levels below 15 cm but minimal influence above 15 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig RJ, Kline JD, Lichtenstein M (2004) Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 69:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison FE (1973) Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 97–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2001) The carbon budget in soils. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 29:535–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ares A, Peinemann N (1992) Fine-root distribution of coniferous plantations in relation to site in southern Buenos Aires, Argentina. Can J For Res 22:1575–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auch R, Taylor J, Acevedo W (2004) Urban growth in American cities: glimpses of U.S. urbanization. Circular 1252, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey

  • Balesdent J, Mariotti A, Guillet B (1987) Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 19:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartens J, Day SD, Harris JR, Dove JE, Wynn TM (2008) Can urban tree roots improve infiltration through compacted subsoils for stormwater management? J Environ Qual 37:2048–2057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bongarten BC, Teskey RO (1987) Dry weight partitioning and its relationship to productivity in loblolly pine seedlings from seven sources. For Sci 33:255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantley EF (2008) Influence of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) on riparian forests of the southern Piedmont: net primary productivity, carbon sequestration, and native plant regeneration. Dissertation, Auburn University

  • Chaney PL (2007) Encyclopedia of Alabama: climate. http://encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1283 Accessed 4 January 2009

  • Chen X, Hutley LB, Eamus D (2003) Carbon balance of a tropical savanna of northern Australia. Oecologia 137:405–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day SD, Wiseman PE, Dickinson SB, Harris JR (2010) Contemporary concepts of root system architecture of urban trees. Arboricult Urban For 36:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo F, Varela S, Zhao M, Wagner JE, Zipperer W (2010) Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environ Sci Pol 13:362–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994) Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. J Ecol 82:533–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P, Bdioui N, Mary B, Rumpel C (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freer-Smith PH, El-Khatib AA, Taylor G (2004) Capture of particulate pollution by trees: a comparison of species typical of semi-arid areas (Ficus nitida and Eucalyptus globulus) with European and North American species. Water Air Soil Pollut 155:173–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller M, Bai S, Eisinger D, Niemeier D (2009) Practical mitigation measures for diesel particulate matter: near- road vegetation barriers, Contract AQ-04-01: developing effective and quantifiable air quality mitigation measures. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1-physical and mineralogical methods, Book Series: 5, 2nd edn. Soil Sci Soc Am, Wisconsin, pp 383–411

  • Gill RA, Jackson RB (2000) Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol 147:13–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golubiewski N (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s Front Range. Ecol Appl 16:555–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Han DY, Huckabay E (2008) Bermuda grass lawns. Alabama Cooperative Extension System ANR-2. http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0029/ANR-0029.pdf Accessed 13 August 2009

  • Higgins J (1998) Zoysiagrass lawns. ANR-1129 Alabama Cooperative Extension System. http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-1129/ Accessed 13 August 2009

  • Homann PS, Kapchinske JS, Boyce A (2007) Relations of mineral-soil C and N to climate and texture: regional differences within the conterminous USA. Biogeochemistry 85:303–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huh KY, Deurer M, Sivakumaran S, McAuliffe K, Bolan NS (2008) Carbon sequestration in urban landscapes: the example of a turf grass system in New Zealand. Aust J Soil Res 46:10–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyler A, Chappelka AH, Prior SA, Somers GL (2013) Drivers of soil carbon in residential ‘pure lawns’ in Auburn, Alabama. Urban Ecosyt. doi:10.1007/s1125201302943

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen CM, Ledford J, Norby RJ (2008) CO2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytol 179:837–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens IA, Sampson DA, Curiel-Yuste J, Carrara A, Ceulemans R (2002) The carbon cost of fine root turnover in a Scots pine forest. For Ecol Manag 168:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo H-K, McPherson EG (1995) Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. J Environ Manag 45:109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye JP, McCulley RL, Burke IC (2005) Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agricultural ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol 11:575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley KR (1994) Conveyor-belt apparatus for fine grinding of soil and plant materials. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:144–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes MR, Grier CC (1981) Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can J For Res 11:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp KL, Guillard K (2004) Decomposition rates and nitrogen release of turf grass clippings. Plant Science Presentations and Proceedings. Paper 3. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=plsc_confs Accessed 21 January 2008

  • Li Z, Kurz WA, Apps MJ, Beukema SJ (2003) Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP. Can J For Res 33:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter J, Barron SH, Bevacqua CE, Finzi AD, Irving KF, Stemmler EA, Schlesinger WH (2005) Soil carbon sequestration and turnover in a pine forest after six years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Ecology 86:1835–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubowski RN, Vesterby M, Bucholtz S, Baez A, Roberts MJ (2006) Major uses of land in the United States, 2002. EIB-14, Economic Research Service, USDA

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, pp 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • McLauchlan KK (2006) Effects of soil texture on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics after cessation of agriculture. Geoderma 136:289–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNutt RB (1981) Soil survey of Lee County, Alabama. National Cooperative Soil Survey, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi C, Running SW, Elvide CD, Dietz JB, Tuttle BT, Nemani RR (2005) Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States. Environ Manag 36:426–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CC (2008) Soils of Alabama. Alabama Cooperative Extension System ANR-340, USDA-NRCS http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0340/ Accessed 8 April 2010

  • Monk CD (1966) Root-shoot dry weights in loblolly pine. Bot Gaz 127:246–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu SL, DeLucia EH, Thomas RB (1998) Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominant and suppressed loblolly pine. Can J For Res 28:1116–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD (1984) Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in the Southern Great Plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1382–1384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Ledford J, Reilly CD, Miller NE, O’Neill EG (2004) Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. PNAS 101:9689–9693

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (1994) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest. Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. USDA, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ (1996) Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous trees. For Sci 42:504–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Noble MH, Sisinni SM, Dwyer JF (2001) Assessing the US Urban Forest Resources. J Forest 9:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades JM (1988) The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit R, Laband DN (2010) Energy savings from tree shade. Ecol Econ 69:1324–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt RL, Salt GJ (2001) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sand, silt, and clay fractions of soils under maize and pasture. Aust J Soil Res 39:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Arain MA (2007) Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For Ecol Manag 253:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson HÅ (2012) The high input of soil organic matter from dead tree fine roots into the forest soil. Int J For Res. doi:10.1155/2012/217402

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat R, Groffman P, Yesilonis I, Hernandez L (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environ Pollut 116:S107–S118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Yesilonis ID, Golubiewski NE (2009) A comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass and native soil. Urban Ecosyst 12:45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Follett RF (2002) Assessing soil carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems using long-term soil testing data. Agron J 94:930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian YL, Bandaranayake W, Parton WJ, Mecham B, Harivandi MA, Mosier AR (2003) Long-term effects of clipping and nitrogen management in turfgrass on soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics: the CENTURY model simulation. J Environ Qual 32:1694–1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Follett RF, Kimble JM (2010) Soil organic carbon input from urban turfgrasses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:366–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raciti SM, Groffman PM, Fahey TJ (2008) Nitrogen retention in urban lawns and forests. Ecol Appl 18:1615–1626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raciti SM, Groffman PM, Jenkins JC, Pouyat RV, Fahey TJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2011) Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen in residential soils with different land-use histories. Ecosystems 14:287–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritson P, Sochacki S (2003) Measurement and prediction of biomass and carbon content of Pinus pinaster trees in farm forestry plantations, south-western Australia. For Ecol Manag 175:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudie RJ Jr, Dewers RS (1984) Effects of tree shade on home cooling requirements. J Arbor 10:320–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell AE, Raich JW, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Fisher RF (2007) Tree species effects on soil properties in experimental plantations in tropical moist forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1389–1397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saggar S, Parshotam A, Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Hart PBS (1996) 14C-labelled ryegrass turnover and residence time in soils varying in clay content and mineralogy. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1677–1686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders RA (1986) Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecol 9:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharenbroch BC, Lloyd JE, Johnson-Maynard JL (2005) Distinguishing urban soils with physical, chemical, and biological properties. Pedobiologia 49:283–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selhorst AL, Lal R (2011) Carbon budgeting in golf course soils of Central Ohio. Urban Ecosyst 14:771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C- saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smetak KM, Johnson-Maynard JL, Lloyd JE (2007) Earthworm population density and diversity in different-aged urban systems. Appl Soil Ecol 37:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stover DB, Day FP, Drake BG, Hinkle CR (2010) The long-term effects of CO2 enrichment on fine root productivity, mortality, and survivorship in a scrub-oak ecosystem at Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA. Environ Exp Bot 69:214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudmeyer RA, Speijers J, Nicholas BD (2004) Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines. Tree Physiol 24:1333–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2009) Latitude and Longitude All U.S. Places. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/latlng.txt. Accessed 22 May 2009

  • U.S. Climate Data (2011) http://www.usclimatedata.com/map.php?location=USAL0035. Accessed 4 Jan 2011

  • USDA NRCS (2009) Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils: Ultisols http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/orders/ultisols.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2009

  • Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Palmiotto PA, Boon P, O’Hara J, Asbjornsen H (1996) Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187:159–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD (2010) The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao C-W, Yuste JC, Janssens IA, Roskams P, Nachtergale L, Carrara A, Sanchez BY, Ceulemans R (2003) Above- and belowground biomass and net primary production in an 73-year-old Scots pine forest. Tree Physiol 23:505–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Tian H, Chen G, Chappelka A, Xu X, Ren W, Hui D, Liu M, Lu C, Pan S, Lockaby G (2012) Impacts of urbanization on carbon balance in terrestrial ecosystems of the Southern United States. Environ Pollut 164:89–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very thankful for the technical and/or field assistance from William Avery, Jonathon Bartlett, Kyle Bolton, Nick Gilliland, Robin Governo, Dr. B. Graeme Lockaby, Nick Martin, Matthew McCollough and Efrem Robbins. For carbon and nitrogen analysis and technical assistance, we are greatly appreciative of Barry G. Dorman and Dr. Juan B. Rodriguez with the National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Auburn, AL. In addition, we are very grateful for the thorough, accurate editorial contributions from Dr. Francisco Escobedo and the 2 anonymous reviewers. Partial financial support provided by Mcintire-Stennis funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Huyler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huyler, A., Chappelka, A.H., Prior, S.A. et al. Influence of aboveground tree biomass, home age, and yard maintenance on soil carbon levels in residential yards. Urban Ecosyst 17, 787–805 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0350-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0350-7

Keywords

Navigation