Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the spatial distribution of vascular plants along a 21-kilometre rural–urban–rural transect in the city of Tampere, Finland. The study emphasised the distribution of native and non-native species, both in absolute numbers and proportionally. The observed differences are explained by the share of forest land, the number of detached houses, distance from the city centre, and human population. Non-natives showed the highest values in suburban areas. Still, the difference in number of non-natives between suburban and central areas was quite small. In the city of Tampere, there are not continuous large areas devoid of vegetation. The number of native species remained high until the urban core and natives dominated in the rural-type areas of the city. However, there was not a great difference in the number of native species between rural and suburban areas. In the suburban areas, the detached houses and block-of-flats have little effect on the general vegetation. Proportionally, the share of natives decreases in line with the urban traits of the city. Urbanisation therefore affects native species in Finland. Overall, the characteristic features of a Finnish city, such as dispersed urban structure, small population, late urbanisation, abundant natural vegetation (forest) and the qualities of Finnish forests, guarantee the continuing diversity of urban vascular plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blair R (1999) Birds and butterflies along an Urban Gradient: surrogate Taxa for assessing Biodiversity? Ecol Appl 9(1):164–170
Blair RB (2004) The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society 9(5). URL: http//www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2/
Bomanowska A, Witosławski P (2008) Selected aspects of diversity of synanthropic flora in chosen cities of central Poland. Biodiv Res Conserv 9–10:35–42
Bongers F, Poorter L, Hawthorne WD, Sheil D (2009) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis applies to tropical forest, but disturbance contributes little to tree diversity. Ecol Lett 12(8):798–805
Burton ML, Samuelsson LJ, Pan S (2005) Riparian Woody plant diversity and forest structure along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 8:93–106
Chocholouskova Z, Pysek P (2003) Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzen. Flora 198:366–376
Clark PJ, Reed JM, Chew FS (2007) Effects of urbanization on butterfly species richness, guild structure, and rarity. Urban Ecosyst 10(3):157–164
Connell JH (1978) Diversity in the tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310
DeCandido R, Muir AA, Gargiullo MB (2004) A first approximation of the historical and extant vascular flora of New York City: implications for native plant species conservation. J Torrey Bot Soc 131:243–251
Garaffa PI, Filloy J, Bellocq MI (2008) Bird community responses along urban–rural gradient: does the size of the urbanized area matter? Landsc Urban Plann 90(1–2):33–41
Gering JC, Blair RB (1999) Predation of artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? Ecography 22(5):532–541
Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347
Gray JS (1989) Effects of environmental stress on species assemblages. Biol J Linn Soc 37:19–32
Guntensbergen GR, Levenson JB (1997) Understorey plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:155–169
Gödde M, Richarz N, Walter B (1995) Habitat conservation and development in the city of Düsselforf, Germany. In: Sukopp H, Numata M, Huber A (eds) Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 163–171
Hahs AK, McDonnel MJ, McCarthy MA, Vesk PA, Corlett RT, Norton BA, Clemants SE, Duncan RP, Thompson K, Schwartz MW, Williams NSG (2009) A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol Lett 12:1165–1173
Horwitz RJ, Johnson T, Hession WC (2001) Fish Communities along an Urban Gradient: Influences of Riparian Vegetation. Conference Proceeding Paper: Bridging the Gap: Meeting the World’s Water and Environmental Resources Challenges. Section 1, chapter 173
Hämet-Ahti L, Suominen J, Ulvinen T, Uotila P (eds) (1998) Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland), Ed. 4. 656 pp. Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum. Helsinki
Hansen A, Knight R, Marzluff J, Powell S, Brown K, Gude P, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs
Kasanko M, Barredo JI, Lavalle C, McCormick N, Demicheli L, Sagris V, Brezger A (2006) Are European cities becoming dispersed? A comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 77:111–130
Knapp S, Kuhn I, Schweiger O, Klotz S (2008) Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecol Lett 11(10):1054–1064
Kowarik I (1995) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Pysek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions—general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, p 263
Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764
Kurtto A, Helynranta L (1998) Helsingin kasvit. (Flora oh Helsinki). – Helsingin kaupungin ympäristökeskus and Helsinki University Press. 400 p
Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12(4):604–620
Mahan C, O’Connell T (2005) Small mammal use of suburban and urban parks in Central Pennsylvania. Northeast Nat 12(3):307–314
Marks PL, Wesley FR, Gardescu S (2008) The vascular plant diversity of the Finger Lakes region of central New York State: changes in the 1800s and 1900s. J Torrey Bot Soc 135(1):53–69
McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 2008(23):1143–1155
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237
McDonnell MJ, Pickett S, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Bouyat R, Zipperer W, Parmelee R, Carreiro M, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36
McKinney M (2002) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Cons 127:247–260
McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11(2):161–176
Niemelä J, Kotze J (2009) Carabid beetle assemblages along urban to rural gradients: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 92(2):65–71
Niemelä J, Kotze JD, Yli-Pelkonen V (2009) Comparative urban ecology: challenges and possibilities. In: Ecology of cities and Towns: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge University Press 2009. 714 pp
Olden JD, LeRoy Poff N, Douglas MR, Douglas M, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19(1):18–24
Pickett STA, Cardenasso ML, McDonnell MJ, Burch WR (2009) Frameworks for urban ecosystem studies: gradients, patch dynamics and the human ecosystem in the New York metropolitan area and Baltimore, USA. In: Ecology of cities and Towns: A Comparative Approach. Cambridge University Press 2009. 714 pp
Ranta P, Rahkonen P (2008) Tampereen kaupunkiluonto. Opas kaupunkiekologiaan (A guide to urban ecology of the city of Tampere). Tampere-Seura. 235 pp
Ranta P, Tanskanen A, Niemelä J, Kurtto A (1999) Selection of islands for conservation in the Urban Archipelago of Helsinki, Finland. Conserv Biol 13(6):1293–1300
Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2010) The 2010 Red Lists of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. Helsinki. 685 p
Reinikainen A, Mäkipää R, Vanha-Majamaa I, Hotanen J-P (eds) (2001) Kasvit muuttuvassa metsäluonnossa. (Changes in the frequency and abundance of forest and mire plants in Finland since 1950s. In Finnish with English summary). Tammi. 384 pp
Robinson GR, Yurlina ME, Handel SN (1994) A century of change in the Staten Island flora: ecological correlates of species losses and invasions. Bull Torrey Bot Club 121(2):119–129
Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 48:131–142
Tonteri T, Haila Y (1990) Plants in a boreal city: ecological characteristics of vegetation in Helsinki and its surroundings; southern Finland. Ann Bot Fenn 27(4):337–352
Väre H, Ulvinen T, Vilpa E, Kalleinen L (2005) Oulun kasvit-Piimäperältä Pilpasuolle. Norrlinia 11:1–512, Abstract: The flora of the city of Oulu in northern Finland
Wittig R (1993) Flora und vegetation. In: Sukopp H, Wittig R (eds) Stadtökologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag. 402 pp
Wittig R, Diesing D, Gödde M (1985) Urbanophob-urbanoneutral-urbanophil—Das Verhalten der Arten gegenüber dem Lebensraum Stadt. Flora 177:265–282
Wittig R, Sukopp H, Klausnitzer B (1993) Die Ökologische Gliederung der Stadt. In: Sukopp H, Wittig R (eds) Stadtökologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag. 402 pp
Zipperer W, Guntensbergen G (2009) Vegetation composition and structure of forest patches along urban-rural gradients. – In: McDonnell. M., Hahs, A. and Breuste, J. (eds.): Ecology of Cities and Towns. Cambridge University Press. 714 p
Zipperer WC, Wu J, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecol Appl 10(3):685–688
Acknowledgements
Mr. Jouko Sipari helped with the field work, Dr. Tarmo Virtanen gave advice on the statistical analysis and prof. Jari Niemelä provided comments on the manuscript. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ranta, P., Viljanen, V. Vascular plants along an urban-rural gradient in the city of Tampere, Finland. Urban Ecosyst 14, 361–376 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0164-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0164-9