Skip to main content
Log in

The differentiation of camel breeds based on meat measurements using discriminant analysis

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meat productivity of camel in the tropics is still under investigation for identification of better meat breed or type. Therefore, four one-humped Saudi Arabian (SA) camel breeds, Majaheem, Maghateer, Hamrah, and Safrah were experimented in order to differentiate them from each other based on meat measurements. The measurements were biometrical meat traits measured on six intact males from each breed. The results showed higher values of the Majaheem breed than that obtained for the other breeds except few cases such dressing percentage and rib-eye area. In differentiation analysis, the most discriminating meat variables were myofibrillar protein index, meat color components (L* and a*, b*), and cooking loss. Consequently, the Safrah and the Majaheem breeds presented the largest dissimilarity as evidenced by their multivariate means. The canonical discriminant analysis allowed an additional understanding of the differentiation between breeds. Furthermore, two large clusters, one formed by Hamrah and Maghateer in one group along with Safrah. These classifications may assign each breed into one cluster considering they are better as meat producers. The Majaheem was clustered alone in another cluster that might be a result of being better as milk producers. Nevertheless, the productivity type of the camel breeds of SA needs further morphology and genetic descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdallah, H.R. and Faye B., 2012. Phenotypic classification of Saudi Arabian camel (Camelusdromedarius) by their body measurements. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 24, 272--280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Atiyat, R., 2009. Diversity of chicken populations in Jordan determined using discriminate analysis of performance traits. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11, 374--380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertí, P., Panea, B., Sañudo, C., Olleta, J.L., Ripoll, G., Ertbjerg, P., Christensen, M., Gigli, S., Failla, S., Concetti, S., Hocquette, J.F., Jailler, R., Rudel, S., Renand, G. and Nute, G.R., Richardson, R.I., Williams, J.L., 2008. Live weight, body size and carcass characteristics of young bulls of fifteen European breeds. Livestock Science, 114, 19--30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Eknah. M., El-Sammani, E. and Baksh, A., 1997. Description, classification and comparative performance of indigenous camel breeds in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology, (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).

  • Al-Hazmi, M. A., Ghadour, A. M. and El-Gohar, M., 1994. A study of the biometry of some breeds of Arabian camel (Camelusdromedarius) in Saudi Arabia, (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).

  • Almathen, F. S., Mwacharo, J. and Hanoteo, O., 2012. Genetic diversity and relationships of indigenous Saudi Arabia camel (Camelusdromedarius) populations. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Society of Camelid Research and Development, (Muscat, Sultanate of Oman). 14--15.

  • Al-Owaimer, A.N., Suliman, G.M., Sami, A.S., Picard, B., and Hocquette, J.F. 2014. Chemical composition and structural characteristics of Arabian camel (Camelusdromedarius) m. longissimus thoracis. Meat Science, 96, 1233--1241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Swailem, A. M., Al-Busadah, K. A., Shehata, M. M., Al-Anazi, I. O. and Askari E. 2007. Classification of Saudi Arabian camel (Camelusdromedarius) subtypes based on RAPD technique. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 5 (1), 143--148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, (AOAC International Maryland, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J.D. and Cook, H.C., 1984. Manual of Histological Techniques, (Churchill Livingstone, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir Oulad A., Chehma A. and B. Faye 2013. Phenotypic variability of two principal Algerian camel’s populations (Targui and Sahraoui). Emirate Journal of Food and Agriculture, 25 (3): 231--237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, C.P. and Ennesser Y., 1989. Approchezoogeographique de la différenciationinfraspécifique chez le dromedaire Camelus dromedarius Linné, 1776 (Mammalia: Camelidae). Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux. 42: 573--57. (In French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chniter M, Hammadi M, Khorchani T, Krit R, Benwahada A, Hamouda MB. 2013. Classification of Maghrebi camels (Camelus dromedarius) according to their tribal affiliation and body traits in southern Tunisia. Emirate Journal of Food and Agriculture, 25 (8): 625--634.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIE, 2004. Colorimetry - Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour space. CIE Central Bureau, Vienna DS, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H.R., West, R.L., and Dutson, T.R., 1981. Comparison of Methods for Measuring Sarcomere Length in Beef Semi tendinosus Muscle. Meat Science, 5, 261--66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Culler, R.D., Parrish, F.C., Smith, G.C. and Cross, H.R., 1978. Relationship of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. Journal of Food Science, 43, 1177--80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faye, B., Abdallah, H., Almathen, F., Harzallah, B., and Al-Mutairi, S., 2011, Camel biodiversity. Camel phenotypes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Camel Breeding, Protection and Improvement Center, project UTF/SAU/021/SAU, (FAO Publ., Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, A. H., Al-Shaikh M. A., Aljummah R. S. and Mohammed O. B., 2013. Genetic characterization of Majaheem camel population in Saudi Arabia based on microsatellite markers. Research Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (4), 26--30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrous, K. F, Ramadan, H. A. I., Abdel-Aziem, S. H., Abd-Elmordy and Hemdan, D. M., 2011. Genetic variations between camel breeds using microsatellite markers and RAPD techniques. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 39, 2626--2634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, A., Tewolde, A., and Mosconi C., 2007. Animal Production and Animal Science Worldwide. Wageningen Academic Pub, 2007.

  • SAS (Statistical Analysis System program). 2012. DISCRIM, STEPDISC and CANDISC procedures, version 9.3.2, (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA).

  • Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., and Kumar, S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725--2729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S.D., and Koohmaraie, M. 1996. Sampling, cooking, and coring effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force values in beef. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 1553--1562.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R. T. 1984. The camel, (Longman Publishing London).

  • Yosef, T., Kefelegn, K., Mohammed, Y. K, Mengistu, U., Solomon, A., Tadelle, D., Han, J., 2014. Morphological diversities and eco-geographical structuring of Ethiopian camel (Camelus dromedarius) populations. Emirate Journal of Food and Agriculture, 26 (4): 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research group No. RG-1435-064.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raed Mahmoud Al-Atiyat.

Ethics declarations

The slaughter process was in accordance with the Islamic legislations (Halal).

Statement of animal rights

The experimental procedure was approved by Animal Ethics Committee at the King Saud University (No. 125–2013).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Camelids

Guest Editor: Bernard Faye

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Atiyat, R.M., Suliman, G., AlSuhaibani, E. et al. The differentiation of camel breeds based on meat measurements using discriminant analysis. Trop Anim Health Prod 48, 871–878 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0990-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0990-5

Keywords

Navigation