Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of local energy sources in milk production in a tropical silvopastoral system with Erythrina poeppigiana

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to determine the effect of four local energy sources (sorghum grain, green banana, polished rice, and sugarcane molasses) fed to dairy cows on intake, milk production and composition, and economic viability in a silvopastoral system in Costa Rica (Turrialba). Twelve grazing cows (Jersey × Central American Milking Creole), with a mean live weight of 332 kg (SD 34), were supplemented with 0.5 kg of dry matter (DM)/100 kg/LW of Erythrina porppigiana fresh foliage daily. Experimental design was a replicated change—over 4 × 4 Latin Square. The pasture composition was 11 and 17 % of star grass (Cynodon niemfuensis), 32 and 28 % of ruzzi grass (Brachiaria rusisiensis), and 45 and 42 % of natural grasses (Axonopus compresus and Paspalum conjugatum) at initial and final times of the essay, respectively. The grass allowance was 30.14 DM/cow/day. Significant differences were found among treatments for variable milk fat content (P < 0.05). Sorghum presented the highest (41.2 g/kg milk) content of milk fat, followed by green banana (39.2 g/kg milk), polished rice (38.3 g/kg milk) and molasses (38.1 g/kg milk). Non-significant differences (P > 0.05) resulted for total milk production (sorghum 9.0 kg/cow/day; green banana 8.9 kg/cow/day; polished rice 8.8 kg/cow/day; molasses 8.6 kg/cow/day) and fat-corrected milk (FCM). The financial analysis showed that all treatments were economically viable; however, supplementation with green bananas and molasses were the most favorable due to the low costs incurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, L., Maquivar, M., Galina, C., Mendoza, G.D., Guzman, A., Estrada, S., Villareal, M., and Molina, R., 2008. Effect of ruminally protected methionine on the productive and reproductive perfomance of grazing Bos indicius heifers raised in the humids tropics of Costa Rica, Tropical Animal Health Production, 40 (8), 667–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC, 1997. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edition, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranda, I.E., Mendoza, G.D., García-Bojalil, F., and Castrejón, P., 2001. Growth of heifers grazing stargrass complemented with sugar cane, urea and a protein supplement, Livestock Production Science, 71, 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camero, A., Ibrahim, M., and Kass, M., 2001. Improving rumen fermentation and milk production with legume-tree fodder in the tropics, Agroforestry Systems, 51, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Alba, J. and Kennedy, B.W., 1985. Milk production in the Latin-America Milking Creole and its crosses with the Jersey, Animal Production, 41 (2), 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feedipedia, 2015. Cereal grains and by-products. On line Animal Feed Resources Information System, Inra-Cirad-Afz-Fao, http://www.feedipedia.org/content/about-feedipedia (Accessed 02 Feb. 2015).

  • Franzel, S., Scherr,S., Coe, R., Cooper, P., Place, F. 2002. Methods for assessing agroforestry adoption potencial. In: S. Franzel and S.J. Scherr (eds), Trees on the farm. CAB Int (UK) and ICRAF (Kenya), 11–35.

  • Garduza-Arias, G., Garcia-Bojalil, C.M. Mendoza, G.D., Sánchez-Torres, M.T., Suárez, M.E., and Guzmán, A., 2013. Effect of supplementation with rumen undegradable protein on milk production and ovarian activity in double purpose cows. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41:223–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M.A., Villanueva, C., M, C. 2005. Traditional and improved silvopastoral systems and their importance in sustainability of livestock farms. In: M. Mosquera-Losada, R. Rigueiro-Rodríguez and A. McAdam, (eds), Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CABI (UK), 13–18

  • Ibrahim, M.A., Holmann, F., Hernandez, M., and Camero, A., 2000. Contribution of Erythrina protein banks and rejected bananas for improving cattle production in the humid tropics, Agroforestry Systems, 49, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku-Vera, J.C., Briceño, E.G., Ruiz, A., Mayo, R., Ayala, A.J., Aguilar, C.F., Solorio, F.J., and Ramírez, L., 2014. Manipulation of the energy metabolism of ruminants in the tropics: options for improving meat and milk production and quality, Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 48, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara, A., Mendoza, G.D., Landois, L.A., Bárcena, R., Sanchez, T., Rojo, R., Ayala, J., and Vega, S., 2006. Milk production in Holstein cows supplemented with different levels of ruminally protected methionine, Livestock Science, 105, 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng, R.A., 1986. Drought Feeding Strategies: Theory and Practice, (Pernambul Books, Armidale, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S., Dijkistra, J., and France, J., 2000. Prediction of energy supply in ruminants, with emphasis on forages. In: D.I. Givens, R. Owen, R. Axford, and H. Omed, (eds), Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, (CABI, Oxford UK), 63–94 .

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. L., 1983. Design and analysis of feeding experiments with milking dairy cattle. North Caroline State University, Raleigh, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahasukhonthachata, K., Sopadeb, PA., Gidleyb, M. 2010 Kinetics of starch digestion in sorghum as affected by particle size. Journal of Food Engineering (96), 1, 18–28.

  • Mendieta-Araica, B., Spörndly, R., Reyes-Sánchez, N., and Spörndly, E. 2011. Moringa (Moringa oleifera) leaf meal as a source of protein in locally produced concentrates for dairy cows fed low protein diets in tropical areas, Livestock Science, 137, 10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mould, F.L., Ørskov, E.R., and Mann, S.O. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 10, 15–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murgueitio, E., Calle, Z., Uribea, F., Calle, A., Solorio, B., 2011. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands, Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1654–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, L., 2014. A new climate for grazing livestock, Nature Climate Change, 4, 321–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plata, F.X., Ricalde, R.V., Melgoza, L.M., Mendoza, G.D., Franco, F.J. 2004. Efecto de la dosis de α amilasa (Bacillus licheniformis), temperatura de solución y molido de grano de sorgo en la aglutinación del almidón y digestibilidad ruminal in vitro. Interciencia (26) 12, 686–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Plata, F.X., Mendoza, G.D., Viccon, J.A., Bárcena, R., Clemente, F., 2011. Comparación de métodos basados en los requerimientos nutricionales y disponibilidad de biomasa para estimar la capacidad de carga para venado cola blanca, Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria (Chile), 43, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnier C., Bocagea, B., Archimèdea H., Nobletb, D., Renaudeaua, D. 2013. Digestive utilization of tropical foliages of cassava, sweet potatoes, wild cocoyam and erythrina in Creole growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 180, 44– 54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rojo, R.R., Vázquez, A.J., Mendoza, M.G., Zalem, A.Z., Pérez, H.P., Hernández, M.J., Avilés N.F., Rebollar R.S., and Cardoso, J.D., 2009. Dual purpose cattle production in Mexico, Tropical Animal Health Production, 41 (5), 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, N.R. and Ledin, I., 2006. Effect of feeding different levels of foliage from Cratylia argentea to creole dairy cows on intake, digestibility, milk production and milk composition, Tropical Animal Health Production, 38 (4), 343–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS, 2012. SAS/STAT. User’s Guide, (Sas Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H., Wassenaar, S., and Jutzi, H., 2006. Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends, Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 25 (2), 505–516.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • t’Mannetje, L. and Haydock, K.P., 1963. The dry weight-rank method for the botanical analyses of pasture, Journal of the British Grassland Society, 18, 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, M.A. and Terry, R.A., 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops, Journal of the British Grassland Society, 18, 104–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van-Soest, P., Robertson J., and Lewis B., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are extended to the staff of Tropical Livestock of CATIE (Turrialba, Costa Rica) and especially to Ph. D. Maria L. Kass.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Jiménez-Ferrer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiménez-Ferrer, G., Mendoza-Martínez, G., Soto-Pinto, L. et al. Evaluation of local energy sources in milk production in a tropical silvopastoral system with Erythrina poeppigiana . Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 903–908 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0806-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0806-7

Keywords

Navigation