Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Method for Gas–Water Relative Permeability Measurement of Coal Using NMR Relaxation

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the conventional volumetric method in unsteady-state relative permeability measurements for unconventional gas reservoirs, such as coal and gas shale, is a significant challenge because the movable water volume in coal or shale is too small to be detected. Moreover, the dead volume in the measurement system adds extra inaccuracy to the displaced water determination. In this study, a low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer was introduced into a custom-built relative permeability measurement apparatus, and a new method was developed to accurately quantify the displaced water, avoiding the drawback of the dead volume. The changes of water in the coal matrix and cleats were monitored during the unsteady-state displacement experiments. Relative permeability curves for two Chinese anthracite and bituminous coals were obtained, matching the existing research results from the Chinese coalbed methane area. Moreover, the influences of confining pressure on the shape of the relative permeability curve were evaluated. Although uncertainties and limits exist, the NMR-based method is a practical and applicable method to evaluate the gas/water relative permeability of ultra-low permeability rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Amplitude index

A ad :

Air-dry-based ash yield

F cad :

Air-dry-based fixed carbon content

f w :

Fractional flow of water in outlet stream

I :

Volume percentages of inertinite in coal maceral composition

I r :

Relative injectivity

k rg :

Relative permeability of gas

k rw :

Relative permeability of water

L :

Volume percentages of liptinite in coal maceral composition

M ad :

Air-dry-based moisture content

MM:

Volume percentage of minerals on a dry basis

N p :

Cumulative water produced

P1,2,3:

Peaks in T2 distribution spectra

P inlet :

Inlet gas pressure

P outlet :

Outlet gas pressure

q t :

Total flow rate or gas injection rate

R o :

Mean maximum vitrinite reflectance in oil

S/V :

Surface-to-volume ratio

S g2 :

Outlet gas saturation

S gcross :

Gas saturation at crossing points

S gi :

Initial gas saturation

S wr :

Irreducible water saturation

T 0 :

Total amplitude of T2 at the initial displacement time

T 2 :

Proton NMR transverse relaxation time

T t :

Total amplitude of T2 at different displacement times

V :

Volume percentages of vitrinite in coal maceral composition

W i :

Cumulative gas injected

P :

Pressure difference

W ig :

Injection gas volume under inlet gas pressure at a given interval value

ρ 2 :

Surface relaxivity

μ g :

Gas viscosities

μ w :

Water viscosities

B:

Bulk relaxation

S:

Surface relaxation

References

  • Alexis, D.A., Karpyn, Z.T., Ertekin, T., Crandall, D.: Fracture permeability and relative permeability of coal and their dependence on stress conditions. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Res. 10, 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.H., Corey, A.T.: Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 6, 61–88 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Liu, D., Pan, Z., Che, Y., Liu, Z.: Investigating the effects of seepage-pores and fractures on coal permeability by fractal analysis. Transp. Porous Med. 111, 479–497 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Pan, Z., Liu, J., Connell, L.D.: An improved relative permeability model for coal reservoirs. Int. J. Coal Geol. 109–110, 45–57 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Shi, J., Durucan, S., Korre, A.: Gas and water relative permeability in different coals model match and new insights. Int. J. Coal Geol. 122, 37–49 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, C.R., Jordan, C.L., Gierhart, R.R., Seidle, J.P.: Production data analysis of CBM wells. In: Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Technology Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2007)

  • Coates, G.R., Xiao, L.Z., Prammer, M.G.: NMR Logging Principles and Applications. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M.J., Mavor, M.J., Saulsberry, J., Barree, R.B., Schraufnagel, R.A.: Multi-phase flow properties for coalbed methane wells: a laboratory and field study. In: Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1995)

  • Durucan, S., Ahsan, M., Shi, J.Q.: Two phase relative permeabilities for gas and water in selected European coals. Fuel 134, 226–236 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firoozabadi, A., Aziz, K.: Relative permeabilities from centrifuge data. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 30, 2–4 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gash, B.W.: Measurement of “rock properties” in coal for coalbed methane production. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1991)

  • Guo, R., Kantzas, A.: Assessing the water uptake of Alberta coal and the impact of CO2 injection with low-field NMR. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 48, 40–46 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham, Y.S., Kantzas, A.: Measurement of relative permeability of coal: approaches and limitations. In: CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2008)

  • Ham, Y.S., Kantzas, A.: Relative permeability of coal to gas (helium, methane, and carbon dioxide) and water-result and experimental limitations. In: Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2011)

  • Ham, Y.S., Kantzas, A.: Measurement of relative permeability of coal to gas and water. In: SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2013)

  • Honarpour, M., Mahmood, S.M.: Relative-permeability measurements: an overview. J. Pet. Technol. 40, 963–966 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.J., Kenyon, W.E., Straley, C.: Proton-magnetic resonance and pore-size variations in reservoir sandstones. SPE Form. Eval. 8, 194–200 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E.F., Bossler, D.P., Naumann, V.O.: Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments. Trans. AIME 216, 370–372 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, J., de Zabala, E.F., Boyer, R.E.: Water/oil relative permeability endpoints of intermediate wet low permeability rocks. SPE Form. Eval. 10, 26–28 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, W.E., Day, P.I., Straley, C., Willemsen, J.F.: A three part study of NMR longitudinal relaxation properties of water-saturated sandstones. SPE Form. Eval. 3, 622–636 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K.: More general capillary pressure and relative permeability models from fractal geometry. J. Contam. Hydrol. 111, 13–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H.H., Rutqvist, J.: A new coal-permeability model: internal swelling stress and fracture–matrix interaction. Transp. Porous Med. 82, 157–171 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Harpalani, S., Pillalamarry, M.: Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production. Part 2. Modeling results. Fuel 94, 117–124 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourbakhsh, A.: Determination of capillary pressure, relative permeability and pores size distribution characteristics of coal from Sydney basin-Canada. M.S. thesis, Dalhousie University (2012)

  • Perera, M.S.A., Ranjith, P.G., Choi, S.K., Airey, D.: The effects of sub-critical and super-critical carbon dioxide adsorption-induced coal matrix swelling on the permeability of naturally fractured black coal. Energy 36, 6442–6450 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, R., Evanoff, J.C., Brugler, M.L.: Measurement of coal cleat porosity and relative permeability characteristics. In: SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1991)

  • Rapoport, L.A., Laeas, W.J.: Relative permeability to liquid in liquid–gas systems. Trans. AIME 192, 83–89 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznik, A.A., Dabbous, M.K., Fulton, P.F., Taber, J.J.: Air–water relative permeability studies of Pittsburgh and Pocahontas coals. SPE J. 14, 556–562 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, P.S., Schraufnagel, R.A. (eds.): A guide to coalbed methane: the success of coalbed methane. Gas research institute report GRI-94/0397, Chicago (1996)

  • Shen, J., Qin, Y., Wang, G.X., Fu, X., Wei, C., Lei, B.: Relative permeability of gas and water for different rank coals. Int. J. Coal Geol. 86, 266–275 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J.Q., Durucan, S.: Gas storage and flow in coalbed reservoirs: implementation of a bidisperse pore model for gas diffusion in a coal matrix. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 8, 169–175 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Elsworth, D., Pan, Z.: Interactions and exchange of CO2 and H2O in coals: an investigation by low-field NMR relaxation. Sci. Rep. 6, 19919 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SY/T 5843: Gas–water relative permeability measurement. Standardization Administration of Oil and Gas Industry of the People’s Republic of China (1997) (in Chinese)

  • SY/T 6385: The porosity and permeability measurement of core in net confining stress. Standardization Administration of Oil and Gas Industry of the People’s Republic of China (1999) (in Chinese)

  • Welge, H.J.: A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive. Trans. AIME 195, 99–108 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildenschild, D., Armstrong, R.T., Herring, A.L., Young, I.M., Carey, J.W.: Exploring capillary trapping efficiency as a function of interfacial tension, viscosity, and flow rate. Energy Procedia 4, 4945–4952 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Liu, D.: Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals. Fuel 95, 152–158 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Liu, D., Che, Y., Tang, D., Tang, S., Huang, W.: Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Fuel 89, 1371–1380 (2010a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Liu, D., Cai, Y., Li, J.: Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography. Earth Sci. 53, 854–862 (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Liu, D., Liu, J., Xie, S.: Assessing the water migration and permeability of large intact bituminous and anthracite coals using NMR relaxation spectrometry. Transp. Porous Med. 107, 527–542 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., He, S., Jiao, C., Luan, G., Mo, S., Guo, X.: Determination of dynamic relative permeability in ultra-low permeability sandstones via X-ray CT technique. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 4, 443–455 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Feng, Q., Zhang, X., Wen, S., Zhai, Y.: Relative permeability of coal: a review. Transp. Porous Med. 106, 563–594 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472137), the National Major Research Program for Science and Technology of China (2016ZX05043-001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2652016124) and China Scholarship Council (201606400013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanbin Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Appendix: The JBN Calculation Procedure

Appendix: The JBN Calculation Procedure

In the JBN calculation method, Np and Wi can be obtained by the volume of gas injected and water produced from the experimental data. According to Eqs. (5) and (6), the slopes of Np versus Wi and 1/WiIr versus Wi are used to calculate fw and fw/krw. In this study, the natural logarithmic approximation was used to match the relationships here. Plotting Np versus Wi and fitting the equation,

$$ N_{\text{p}} = a_{0} + a_{1} \ln W_{\text{i}} + a_{2} (\ln W_{\text{i}} )^{2} $$
(A-1)

Thus, we can derive fw from Eqs. (A-1) and (5):

$$ \begin{aligned} f_{\text{w}} & = \frac{{{\text{d}}N_{\text{P}} }}{{{\text{d}}W_{\text{i}} }} = \frac{{a_{1} }}{{W_{\text{i}} }} + 2a_{2} (\ln W_{\text{i}} )\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} }} \\ & = \frac{{a_{1} + 2a_{2} \ln W_{\text{i}} }}{{W_{\text{i}} }} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(A-2)

From Eq. (6), we derive fw/krw:

$$ \frac{{f_{\text{w}} }}{{k_{\text{rw}} }} = \frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} }}} \right)}}{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} }}} \right)}} = \frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} }}} \right)}}{{ - \frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}}^{2} }}{\text{d}}W_{\text{i}} }} = - W_{\text{i}}^{2} \frac{{{\text{d}}\left( {\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} }}} \right)}}{{{\text{d}}W_{\text{i}} }} $$
(A-3)

Then, plotting 1/WiIr versus Wi and fitting the resulting curves by the following equation:

$$ \ln (W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} ) = b_{0} + b_{1} \ln W_{\text{i}} + b_{2} (\ln W_{\text{i}} )^{2} $$
(A-4)

i.e., \( \frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} }} = e^{{ - [b_{0} + b_{1} LnW_{\text{i}} + b_{2} (LnW_{\text{i}} )^{2} ]}}\).

We obtain fw/krw:

$$ \frac{{f_{\text{w}} }}{{k_{\text{rw}} }} = - W_{\text{i}}^{2} \frac{{\text{d}\left(\frac{1}{{W_{\text{i}} I_{\text{r}} }}\right)}}{{\text{d}W_{\text{i}} }} = - W_{\text{i}}^{2} e^{{ - \left[b_{0} + b_{1} LnW_{\text{i}} + b_{2} (LnW_{\text{i}} )^{2}\right] }}\left(0 - \frac{{b_{1} }}{{W_{\text{i}} }} - \frac{{2b_{2} LnW_{\text{i}} }}{{W_{\text{i}} }}\right) = \frac{{b_{1} + 2b_{2} \ln W_{\text{i}} }}{{I_{\text{r}} }} $$
(A-5)

Knowing fw/krw from Eq. (A-5) and fw from Eq. (A-2), we can obtain krw and then calculate krg using Eq. (4).

The outlet gas saturation is as follows:

$$ \begin{aligned} S_{\text{g2}} & = S_{\text{gi}} + N_{\text{p}} - f_{\text{g}} W_{\text{i}} \\ &= S_{\text{gi}} + (a_{0} - a_{1} ) + (a_{1} - 2a_{2} )\ln W_{\text{i}} + a_{2} (\ln W)^{2}_{\text{i}} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(A-6)

Note that the gas volume changes with the pressure change between the inlet gas (Pinlet) and the outlet gas (Poutlet) during gas flow through the core pressure. Thus, Wi is the cumulative gas injected under an average pore pressure:

$$ W_{\text{i}} = W_{{{\text{i}} - 1}} + \frac{{2P_{\text{inlet}} }}{{P_{\text{inlet}} + P_{\text{outlet}} }}\Delta W_{\text{ig}} $$
(A-7)

where ∆Wig is the injection gas volume under the inlet gas pressure at a given interval value.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Yao, Y., Ripepi, N. et al. A Novel Method for Gas–Water Relative Permeability Measurement of Coal Using NMR Relaxation. Transp Porous Med 124, 73–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1053-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1053-y

Keywords

Navigation