Skip to main content
Log in

DOAC compared with warfarin for VTE in patients with obesity: a retrospective cohort study conducted through the VENUS network

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 30 March 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with warfarin remains uncertain in obese patients. We assessed the comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs with warfarin for the treatment of VTE among obese patients. This multi-center retrospective cohort study included adults with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 or weight ≥ 120 kg prescribed either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) or warfarin for a VTE diagnosis. The primary outcome was the 12-month rate of recurrent VTE. The secondary outcome was the 12-month rate of major bleeding. Among 5626 patients, 67% were prescribed warfarin and 33% were prescribed a DOAC. The 12-month VTE recurrence rate was 3.6% (67/1823) for patients treated with DOAC compared with 3.8% (143/3664) for patients treated with warfarin [odds ratio for recurrent VTE on warfarin versus DOAC (OR) (95% CI).07 (0.80, 1.45)]. The 12-month major bleeding rate was 0.5% (10/1868) for patients on DOAC versus 2.4% (89/3758) on warfarin [OR 4.25 (2.19, 8.22)]. Similar proportions of recurrent VTE occurred across BMI thresholds on DOAC and warfarin: for BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (N = 5412), 3.6% versus 3.8%, respectively [OR 1.08 (0.80, 1.46)]; for BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 (N = 2321), 4.4% versus 3.5%, respectively [OR 0.80 (0.51, 1.26)]; and for BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 (N = 560), 3.1% versus 3.7%, respectively [OR 1.18 (0.39, 3.56)]. Similar proportions of recurrent VTE occurred in patients with obesity treated for VTE with DOACs and warfarin. DOACs were associated with lower major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with obesity and VTE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Colacci M, Tseng EK, Sacks CA, Fralick M (2020) Oral anticoagulant utilization in the United States and United Kingdom. J Gen Intern Med 35(8):2505–2507

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Kreuziger LB, Bounameaux H, Doerschug K, Geersing GJ et al (2021) Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 160(6):e545–e608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S (2016) Use of the direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 14(6):1308–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Boonyawat K, Caron F, Li A, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Lim W, Iorio A et al (2017) Association of body weight with efficacy and safety outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost JTH 15(7):1322–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coons JC, Albert L, Bejjani A, Iasella CJ (2020) Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in obese patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Pharmacotherapy 40(3):204–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Minno MN, Lupoli R, Di Minno A, Ambrosino P, Scalera A, Dentali F (2015) Effect of body weight on efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Med 47(1):61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Nisio M, Vedovati MC, Riera-Mestre A, Prins MH, Mueller K, Cohen AT et al (2016) Treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban in relation to body weight. A sub-analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT/PE studies. Thromb Haemost 116(4):739–746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichinger S, Lin M, Shi M, Grosso MA, Kyrle PA (2020) Recurrent venous thromboembolism during anticoagulation with edoxaban or warfarin: a post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE trial. Thromb Res 195:209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshafei MN, Mohamed MFH, El-Bardissy A, Ahmed MB, Abdallah I, Elewa H et al (2020) Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients with acute venous thromboembolism: systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 51:388

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalani C, Awudi E, Alexander T, Udeani G, Surani S (2019) Evaluation of the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in comparison to warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Hosp Pract 47(4):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kido K, Lee JC, Hellwig T, Gulseth MP (2020) Use of direct oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients. Pharmacotherapy 40(1):72–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kido K, Shimizu M, Shiga T, Hashiguchi M (2020) Meta-analysis comparing direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 126:23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kushnir M, Choi Y, Eisenberg R, Rao D, Tolu S, Gao J et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with warfarin in patients with morbid obesity: a single-centre, retrospective analysis of chart data. Lancet Haematol 6(7):e359–e365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Netley J, Howard K, Wilson W (2019) Effects of body mass index on the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants: a retrospective review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 48(3):359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patil T, Lebrecht M (2020) A single center retrospective cohort study evaluating use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese veteran population. Thromb Res 192:124–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spyropoulos AC, Ashton V, Chen YW, Wu B, Peterson ED (2019) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin treatment among morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs. Thromb Res 182:159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tittl L, Endig S, Marten S, Reitter A, Beyer-Westendorf I, Beyer-Westendorf J (2018) Impact of BMI on clinical outcomes of NOAC therapy in daily care: results of the prospective Dresden NOAC Registry (NCT01588119). Int J Cardiol 262:85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wysokinski WE, Froehling DA, Houghton DE, McBane RD, Vlazny DT, Bott-Kitslaar DM et al (2020) Effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for acute venous thromboembolism therapy in patients with extremes in body weight (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03504007). Eur J Haematol 105:484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Younis M, Elkaryoni A, Williams GW, Jakhar I, Suman S, Simon S et al (2020) The use of direct oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with obesity. Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) 12(8):e10006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin KA, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S (2021) Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: Updated communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation. J Thromb Haemost 19(8):1874–1882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulman S, Kearon C (2005) Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3(4):692–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, Schulman S, Anticoagulation tSoCo (2015) Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 13(11):2119–2126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Austin PC, Stuart EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med 34(28):3661–3679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, Mitnik OA (2009) Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96(1):187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Janssen reviewed the study protocol and manuscript but was not involved in the data analysis or manuscript writing. KM is supported by K23HL157758. Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number UL1TR001422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karlyn A Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The following authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper: CL, MEE, KS, SW, IW, LBK. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: RPR received research grants to her institution from BMS and Janssen and is a consultant to BMS and Janssen. KAM received a research grant to her institution from Janssen Scientific Affairs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, K.A., Lancki, N., Li, C. et al. DOAC compared with warfarin for VTE in patients with obesity: a retrospective cohort study conducted through the VENUS network. J Thromb Thrombolysis 55, 685–690 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-023-02774-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-023-02774-1

Keywords

Navigation