Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ticagrelor versus high dose clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with high platelet reactivity post fibrinolysis

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limited data are available on high platelet reactivity (HPR) rate early post fibrinolysis, while no effective way to overcome it has been proposed. In this context, we aimed to compare ticagrelor versus high dose clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who exhibit HPR post fibrinolysis. In a prospective, randomized, parallel design, 3-center study, 56 STEMI patients, out of 83 (67.5 %) screened, who presented with HPR (PRU ≥ 208 by VerifyNow) 3–48 h post fibrinolysis and prior to coronary angiography were allocated to ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose (LD)/90 mg bid maintenance dose (MD) or clopidogrel 600 mg LD/150 mg MD. Platelet reactivity was assessed at randomization (Hour 0), at Hour 2, Hour 24 and pre-discharge. The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity (in PRU) at Hour 2 was significantly lower for ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel with a least square mean difference (95 % confidence interval) of −141.7 (−173.4 to −109.9), p < 0.001. HPR rates at Hour 2 and 24 were significantly lower for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (14.3 vs. 82.1 %, p < 0.001 and 0 vs. 25.0 %, p = 0.01 respectively), though not significantly different pre-discharge. In-hospital Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 bleeding occurred in 1 and 2 clopidogrel and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. In STEMI patients, post fibrinolysis HPR is common. Ticagrelor treats HPR more effectively compared to high dose clopidogrel therapy. Although antiplatelet regimens tested in this study were well tolerated, this finding should be considered only exploratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP et al (2005) Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 366:1607–1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM et al (2005) Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 352:1179–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steg G, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD et al (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/AmericanHeart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:e78–e140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heestermans AA, van Werkum JW, Taubert D et al (2008) Impaired bioavailability of clopidogrel in patients with a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Res 122:776–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K et al (2009) Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation 120:2577–2585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V et al (2012) Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:797–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B et al (2013) Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1601–1606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, for the PLATO Investigators et al (2009) Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 361:1045–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmanis G, Vesterqvist O, Green K et al (1992) Evidence of increased platelet activation after thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 68:374–376

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moser M, Nordt T, Peter K et al (1999) Platelet function during and after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction with reteplase, alteplase, or streptokinase. Circulation 100:1858–1864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurbel PA, Serebruany VL, Shustov AR, for the GUSTO III Investigators et al (1998) Effects of reteplase and alteplase on platelet aggregation and major receptor expression during the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1466–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diego A, de Prado AP, Cuellas C et al (2012) P2Y12 platelet reactivity after thrombolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Res 130:e31–e36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Price MJ, Angiolillo DJ, Teirstein PS et al (2011) Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 as-say: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Circulation 124:1132–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL et al (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123:2736–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Storey RF, Angiolillo DJ, Patil SB et al (2010) Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1456–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexopoulos D, Theodoropoulos KC, Stavrou EF et al (2012) Prasugrel versus high dose clopidogrel to overcome early high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 26:393–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexopoulos D, Gkizas V, Patsilinakos S et al (2013) Double vs standard loading dose of ticagrelor: onset of antiplatelet action in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:940–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexopoulos D, Makris G, Xanthopoulou I et al (2014) Onset of antiplatelet action with high (100 mg) versus standard (60 mg) loading dose of prasugrel in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pharmacodynamic study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:233–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Goudevenos J (2014) Effects of P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 113:2064–2069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K et al (2010) Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study. Circulation 121:1188–1199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexopoulos D, Galati A, Xanthopoulou I et al (2012) Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity following percutaneous coronary intervention: a pharmacodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:193–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E et al (2009) Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:723–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goudevenos J, Ntalas I, Xanthopoulou I et al (2014) Use of ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing thrombolysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 37:356–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr. Alexopoulos has received payment for lectures from AstraZeneca. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Alexopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexopoulos, D., Perperis, A., Koniari, I. et al. Ticagrelor versus high dose clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with high platelet reactivity post fibrinolysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 40, 261–267 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-015-1183-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-015-1183-9

Keywords

Navigation