Skip to main content
Log in

Anticoagulation after subcutaneous enoxaparin is time sensitive in STEMI patients treated with tenecteplase

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adequacy of anticoagulation with enoxaparin as an adjuvant to fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI is unclear and has implications for both efficacy and safety; especially in patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy. A subset of fibrinolytic-treated patients in the WEST study was enrolled in a systematic anti-Xa substudy. All received ASA and subcutaneous (SQ) enoxaparin 1 mg/kg followed by TNK-tPA. Incremental IV dosing of enoxaparin (0.3–0.5 mg/kg) was allowed prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anti-Xa blood samples were drawn prior and after angiography. Data are presented as percentages, medians and IQRs. Forty-five patients underwent angiography 2.8 h (2.5–14.6) after fibrinolytic. The pre-angiography median anti-Xa acquired 179 min (153–875) after SQ enoxaparin was 0.48 U/ml (0.42–0.65); a relationship between anti-Xa activity and time from administration was evident (r = 0.418, p < 0.007). Without supplemental IV enoxaparin the 2nd anti-Xa acquired 218 min (195–930) after SQ enoxaparin was 0.48 U/ml (0.41–0.80, n = 29). After supplemental IV enoxaparin, the 2nd anti-Xa was 0.92 U/ml (0.72–1.10, n = 16). An incremental IV enoxaparin dose and anti-Xa relationship was demonstrated (r = 0.59, p = 0.001) i.e. no IV 0.48 U/ml (0.41–0.80, n = 29), 0.3 mg/kg IV 0.81 U/ml (0.63–1.00, n = 12), and 0.5 mg/kg IV 1.34 U/ml (1.16–1.54, n = 4). Most fibrinolytic treated STEMI patients receiving weight-adjusted SQ enoxaparin (1 mg/kg) had subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels (<0.5 U/ml) after ~3 h. A strategy of supplemental 0.3 mg/kg IV enoxaparin at time of PCI reliably achieved anti-Xa ≥ 0.5 U/ml. Our findings provide a rational novel strategy for anti-thrombotic management in STEMI patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong PW, Chang WC, Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Granger CB, Bogaerts K, Danays T, Van de WF (2006) Efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin: a pooled analysis of ASSENT-3 and -3 PLUS data. Can Med Assoc J 174(10):1421–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antman EM, Morrow DA, McCabe CH, Murphy SA, Ruda M, Sadowski Z, Budaj A, Lopez-Sendon JL, Guneri S, Jiang F, White HD, Fox KA, Braunwald E (2006) Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 354(14):1477–1488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW (2008) 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(2):210–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong PW (2006) A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J 27(13):1530–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buller CE, Pate GE, Armstrong PW, O’Neill BJ, Webb JG, Gallo R, Welsh RC (2006) Catheter thrombosis during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction despite subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin, acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and abciximab pretreatment. Can J Cardiol 22(6):511–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Argenti D, Hoppensteadt D, Heald D, Jensen B, Fareed J (2003) Pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy. Am J Ther 10(4):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aslam MS, Sundberg S, Sabri MN, Cooke D, Lakier JB (2002) Pharmacokinetics of intravenous/subcutaneous enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(2):187–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choussat R, Montalescot G, Collet JP, Vicaut E, Ankri A, Gallois V, Drobinski G, Sotirov I, Thomas D (2002) A unique, low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 40(11):1943–1950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Labeque JN, Jais C, Dubos O, Denard M, Berhouet M, Leroux L, Laplace G, Vergnes C, Pradeau C, Thicoipe M, Dos SP, Coste P (2006) Prehospital administration of enoxaparin before primary angioplasty for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(2):207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine GN, Ferrando T (2004) Degree of anticoagulation after one subcutaneous and one subsequent intravenous booster dose of enoxaparin: implications for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention. J Thromb Thrombolysis 17(3):167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Montalescot G, Collet JP, Tanguy ML, Ankri A, Payot L, Dumaine R, Choussat R, Beygui F, Gallois V, Thomas D (2004) Anti-Xa activity relates to survival and efficacy in unselected acute coronary syndrome patients treated with enoxaparin. Circulation 110(4):392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanchez-Pena P, Hulot JS, Urien S, Ankri A, Collet JP, Choussat R, Lechat P, Montalescot G (2005) Anti-factor Xa kinetics after intravenous enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a population model analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 60(4):364–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Antman EM, Morrow DA, McCabe CH, Jiang F, White HD, Fox KA, Sharma D, Chew P, Braunwald E (2005) Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin as antithrombin therapy in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Design and rationale for the enoxaparin and thrombolysis reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction treatment-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25). Am Heart J 149(2):217–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. White HD, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Jacob AJ, Gotcheva N, Polonetsky L, Antman EM (2007) Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in elderly and younger patients: results from ExTRACT-TIMI 25. Eur Heart J 28(9):1066–1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Montalescot G, Morrow DA, Ardissino D, Cohen M, Gulba DC, Kracoff OH, Lewis BS, Roguin N, Antman EM, Braunwald E (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(23):2238–2246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Armstrong PW, Gershlick A, Goldstein P, Wilcox R, Danays T, Bluhmki E, Van de WF (2010) The strategic reperfusion early after myocardial infarction (STREAM) study. Am Heart J 160(1):30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM, Cohen M, Grines CL, Goodman S, Kereiakes DJ, Langer A, Mahaffey KW, Nessel CC, Armstrong PW, Avezum A, Aylward P, Becker RC, Biasucci L, Borzak S, Col J, Frey MJ, Fry E, Gulba DC, Guneri S, Gurfinkel E, Harrington R, Hochman JS, Kleiman NS, Leon MB, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pepine CJ, Ruzyllo W, Steinhubl SR, Teirstein PS, Toro-Figueroa L, White H (2004) Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 292(1):45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Drouet L, Bal dit SC, Martin J (2009) Adding intravenous unfractionated heparin to standard enoxaparin causes excessive anticoagulation not detected by activated clotting time: results of the STACK-on to ENOXaparin (STACKENOX) study. Am Heart J 158(2):177–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Grant Support: The Which Early ST Elevation Therapy Study? (WEST) was supported by Hoffman-La Roche Canada and sanofi-aventis Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Welsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welsh, R.C., Westerhout, C.M., Buller, C.E. et al. Anticoagulation after subcutaneous enoxaparin is time sensitive in STEMI patients treated with tenecteplase. J Thromb Thrombolysis 34, 126–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-012-0697-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-012-0697-7

Keywords

Navigation