Abstract
This paper suggests that the metaphors of experimentation and the laboratory are applicable when positioning action research vis-à-vis more conventional business school research. Following on from three different action research projects in a large multinational pharmaceutical company, the paper argues that an action researcher can never construct a sheltered environment wherein certain qualities of nature can be isolated, purified, and enhanced, but must always undertake research activities in vivo, in real life organizational setting. Still, the metaphor of the laboratory is applicable because it enables for an understanding of how what Ian Hacking calls interventions in the “hard sciences” share certain characteristics with the action research activities. When action researchers intervene within organizations, the activities are always experimental in nature, i.e., they can never be fully predicted or anticipated, but are initial steps in an emergent process of organizational change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T. W. (2000). The Adorno Reader, Blackwell, Oxford.
Babüroglo, O. N., and Ravn, I. (1992). Normative action research. Organization Studies 13(1), 19–34.
Bartunek, J. M., and Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/Outsider Team Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Bertalanffy, L. von (1968) General System Theory, George Braziller, New York.
Börjesson, S., and Fredberg, T. (2003). Jam Sessions for Collaborative Management Research. In Adler, N., Shani, R., and Styhre, A. (eds.), Collaborative Research in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 135–148.
Bowler, G. (1995). Manufacturing truth. The development of industrial research. In Serres, M. (ed.), A History of Scientific Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.
British Journal of Management, 12, Special Issue on “bridging the gap.”
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., and Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Res. 1(1), 9–28.
Canguilhem, G. (1988). Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Chia, R., and King, I. W. (1998). The organizational structuring of novelty. Organization 5(4), 461–478.
Coghlan, D. (2001). Insider action research projects: Implications for practising managers. Manage. Learn 32(1), 49–60.
Coghlan, D., and Brannick, T. (2001). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: Questions and possibilities. Hum. Relat. 56(8), 983–1003.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). Who is afraid of incommensurability? Organization 5(2), 273–275.
Dewey, J. (1911). How We Think, Heath & Co. Publishers, Boston.
Eden, C., and Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W. R. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London.
Ellis, J. H. M., and Kiely, J. A. (2000). Action inquiry strategies: Taking stock and moving forward. J. Appl. Manage. Stud. 9(1), 83–94.
Foucault, M. (2000). Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 3, Faubion, James D. (Ed.), The New Press, New York.
Friedman, V. J. (2001). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice. In Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry & Practice, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi.
Frost, P. (1997). Bridging academy and business: A conversation with Steve Kerr. Organ. Sci. 8(3), 333–347.
Gergen, K. J. (2003). Action research and orders of democracy. Action Res. 1(1), 39–56.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schartsman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
Grey, C. (2001). Re-imaging relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan. Br. J. Manage 12(Special Issue), 27–32.
Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and Human Interest, Heineman, London.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hargadon, A., and Sutton, R. I. (2000). Buildning an Innovation Factory. Harvard Business Rev. 78(3), 157–166.
Harvey, J., Pettigrew, A., and Ferlie, E. (2002). The determinants of research group performance. Towards Mode 2. J. Manage. Stud. 39(6), 747–774.
Hatchuel, A. (2001). The two pillars of new management research. Br. J. Manage 12(Special Issue), 33–39.
Huff, A. (2000). Presidential address: Changes in organizational knowledge production. Acad. Manage. Rev. 25(2), 288–293.
Johnson, G., and Leavitt, W. (2001). Building for success: Transforming organizations through an appreciative inquiry. Public Pers. Manage 30(1), 129–136.
Kilduff, M., and Keleman, M. (2001). The consolation of organization theory. Br. J. Manage 12(Special Issue), 55–59.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1992). The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: On the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterman, J. C., and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, Thousand oaks, London & New Delhi.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Latour, B. (1983). Give me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World. In Knorr-Certina, K., and Mulkay, M. (eds.), Science Observed, Sage, London.
Latour, B. (1995). Joliot: History and physics mixed together. In Serres, M. (ed.), A History of Scientific Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Lewin, K. (1973). Action research and minority problems. In Lewin, G. (ed.), Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics, Souvenir Press, London, pp. 201–206.
Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virture and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society 17(3), 26–54.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Lyotard, J.-F., and Thébaud, J.-L. (1985). Just Gaming, University of Minnsota Press, Minneapolis.
MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., and Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. Br. J. Manage 13, 189–207.
McNiff, J. (2000). Action Research in Organizations, Routledge, London.
Monk, R. (2000). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, Cape, London.
Organization, 8(2), Special issue on “Re-organizing knowledge, transforming institutions: Knowing, knowledge, and the university in the 21st century,” Ed. by Marta Calás & Linda Smircich.
Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Manage. Learn. 30(2), 207–226.
Reason, P. (2003). Pragmatist philosophy and action research: Readings and conversation with Richard Rorty. Action Res. 1(1), 103–123.
Roth, J. (2002). Knowledge Unplugged: An Action Research Approach to Enable Knowing in R&D Organizations, PhD Dissertation, Fenix Research Programme, Chalmers University of Technology.
Shani, A. B., David, A., and Willson, C. (2004). Collaborative research: Alternative roadmaps. In Adler, N. B., Shani, A. B., and Styhre, A. (eds.), Collaborative Research in Organizations: Foundations for Learning, Change, and Theoretical Development, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi.
Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Airpump, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Starkey, K., and Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. Br. J. Managr. 12(Special Issue), 3–26.
Sundgren, M. (2004). New Thinking, Management Control, & Instrumental Rationality: Managing Organizational Creativity in Pharmaceutical R&D, PhD Dissertation, Fenix Research Programme, Chalmers University of Technology.
Thomas, A. B. (2004). The coming crisis of Western management education. In Jeffcut, P. (ed.), The Foundations of Management Knowledge, Routledge, London & New York.
White, M. (1995). Einstein: A life in Science, Demco Media, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Styhre, A., Sundgren, M. Action Research as Experimentation. Syst Pract Act Res 18, 53–65 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-2459-3
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-2459-3